Should the police be responsible for the death after chasing the fugitive?

The State Compensation Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) (revised 20 12) Chapter II Article 3 of Administrative Compensation:

Where an administrative organ and its staff infringe upon personal rights in the exercise of administrative functions and powers, the victim has the right to compensation.

(a) illegal detention or illegal administrative compulsory measures to restrict the personal freedom of citizens; ?

(two) illegal detention or other illegal deprivation of personal freedom of citizens; ?

(3) Beating, maltreating or instigating or conniving at others' beating or maltreating, causing bodily injury or death to citizens; ?

(four) the illegal use of weapons and police equipment, causing physical injury or death of citizens; ?

(5) Other illegal acts that cause bodily injury or death to citizens.

Extended data:

20 18 12.30 a traffic accident happened in Zhoushan, Zhejiang province, but the driver Guo didn't want to wait for the police to identify the responsibility. After the traffic accident, Guo fled the scene by car. Then the relevant personnel called the police, and the police found the driver's residence according to the information provided by the relevant personnel.

After the traffic police arrived, they found that the concierge was pressing people, so the traffic police knocked on the door and asked Guo to open the door to cooperate with the investigation. Who knows the police knocked on the door for a long time, but no one answered. So the police increased the intensity of knocking at the door, but the shutter opened soon, and a woman came out of the room and shouted for help.

It turned out that Guo ran home after a traffic accident. He thought it was all over, but unexpectedly, the police found him. Because Guo was afraid of drunk driving, in the face of police officers, Guo thought of using a rope to escape from the 10 floor.

The inexperienced Guo accidentally fell to his death. The police tested Guo's blood, and the alcohol content was 158mg/ 100ml.

There must be a relationship between Guo's death and the police, but this relationship has not reached the causal relationship of losing money in civil law. A series of police operations are reasonable and legal, and there is no violation. Guo's behavior is his own choice and has nothing to do with the police.

The behavior of the police did not reach the point where Guo wanted to turn over the window. Therefore, the police do not need compensation for this incident.