The fallacy that "experts" often say

In the collection world, we often hear some absurd fallacies about appraisal. Some people (including some experts in the system) often use some fallacies and heresies that are simply untenable as the basis for identification, and they are hoarse and regard it as an irrefutable golden rule. But if we think calmly, we will find these theories absurd and naive. Below I will sort out a few fallacies that some "experts" often say and discuss with you. Where are the fallacies?

People who hold this fallacy think: "people can't have the same treasure as museums." If there is, it must be a replica museum! " They forgot the fact that the exhibits in the museum came from, as if all the collections in the museum were produced by themselves! In fact, most of the exhibits in the world's major museums are donated by people from all walks of life. If they can have a preliminary understanding of the development history of major museums, they will be ashamed of their fallacies!

Myth 4: "It's fake at first sight, but it can't be fake!" The "appraisal method" that only shouts slogans and does not cite factual basis.

Everyone wants to know, where is this "fake face"? Where are you aiming? You have to say one, two, three, four, or it will be hard to convince people, or even the blind can speak! People who hold this fallacy think that they have superior vision only by saying, "Fake can't be faked any more". Speaking of it, it is a "fake" word. What do you mean persuasive?

Those who use the above fallacies as the basis of antique appraisal are wrong to distinguish authenticity with their ears and imagination instead of their eyes, and will eventually refer to deer as a horse and become the object of collectors' jokes!

Of course, while refuting the above fallacies, we should also be alert to the "national treasure gang." The "national treasure gang" often thinks that they have thousands of "national treasures", treating all imitations as genuine products and reveling in their own "national treasures", which is sad! National treasure does exist among the people, but it is by no means as much as the "national treasure gang" said! I hope every expert can take the quality of the real thing as the basis, don't take it for granted to draw conclusions, and can't use the above fallacies to judge authenticity.