How do you evaluate Dapeng's movie "Pancake Man"?

Thanks to "Pancake Man", we can laugh many times without even realizing it in our life where we can't even laugh.

But when I habitually took out my phone to read other viewers’ reviews of the movie, I was stunned when I saw a few one-star negative reviews at the top. So, on the way home, I kept reflecting on whether there was something wrong with my movie-watching experience, whether there was something wrong with my laughter, whether it was because "I was made laugh by this comedy, so this is a very good movie." There's something wrong with this idea of ??a good comedy.

Of course I don’t want to admit that it’s my problem. At the same time, I am not willing to think that there is a problem with the movie, and I am even less willing to think that there is a problem with the negative reviews of the movie by some seniors who are experienced in watching and criticizing movies. I finally figured it out. The problem was the promotion of this movie.

Just because of the fatigue-bombing publicity, the vow to "save the unhappy", and the general emphasis on understanding and experience in the creative process for fear that others will not know, many seniors are eager to get started, Preparing ammunition and food, with a heart ready to pick on people from all directions, I spent those 113 minutes that could have been very relaxing. Yes, that's it. The slogan "Save the unhappy" is a wrong slogan. The correct slogan should be "Save a heart that is not ready to be happy" - Excuse me, who can do this?

I am somewhat grateful for my superficiality. I neither have the desire to let a fictional movie fulfill my dream of being a diaosi, nor have I watched enough comedies to make my laughter unattainable, nor have I watched so many online dramas and micro-movies that I can’t get enough of them. There are a lot of criticisms about their shooting techniques. I am just a superficial viewer, and I walked into the cinema with a slightly curious mind. I didn’t think they were being opportunistic by finding a lot of faces that would make people laugh at first glance, nor did I expect their script to be so meticulous and brain-burning, and I didn’t even care if it was just a movie. Look at how many flaws it has. I am an ordinary and superficial audience. All I care about is whether I laughed, how many times I laughed, and how long I laughed. I laughed. Laughed a lot. I was still laughing after I walked out of the cinema.

So I felt that my unhappiness was successfully saved.

However, as a junior in watching and criticizing movies, in order to show that I am also a person who pursues the quality of movies, and to narrow the aesthetic gap between myself and my seniors, I can only act objectively It's fair to give the movie itself a three-star rating.

Then because my unhappiness was saved, I gave one more star.

And because I don’t like those one-star movies, in order to make myself happier, I gave them one more star.

As superficial as I am, so willful.