Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - "Don't pick up the remains on the road, don't close the door at night" is a good education method of the times or the majesty of the legal system?

"Don't pick up the remains on the road, don't close the door at night" is a good education method of the times or the majesty of the legal system?

Hehe, first of all, I'm not a naysayer or grandstanding, I'm just telling the truth. It is an ideal state to leave the door open at night, which has never really happened. Don't label it. It is a moral constraint or legal function.

The man said, you are a fallacy. Isn't it true that in a certain era, at a certain period, the road was not connected and the door was not closed at night? Objectively speaking, this is really. I'm telling you, the premise of not picking up the road is to leave something behind. To put it bluntly, there must be gains and losses.

You have nothing. The family wore suits and went out in turn. The only thing that is not enough to save their lives. Will you throw it away? Since there is nothing to lose, there is nothing to pick up. In the same way, it is true that the door is not closed at night. There's nothing to steal at home, whether it's closed or not. In the past, in the countryside, there was no one at home, so it was generally not locked, because it was not stolen, so don't worry.

Collecting money without knowing it is a virtue and should be advocated. This kind of behavior exists now, in the past and in ancient times. The only difference is that sometimes there are more and sometimes there are fewer; The ruler advocates not advocating. People who love reading may have read "Poor Horse Week Can't Find Money", saying that Poor Horse Week went to Chang 'an to seek fame, and on the way, he went east (went to the toilet) and saw a wallet on the wall, which was full of gold and silver jewelry. Ma Zhou was in a hurry, and it was not until the owner came back that he became greedy. Now it seems that Ma Zhou in the Tang Dynasty was the Lei Feng of this world.

It is undeniable that any statement has its own context at that time. If we have to measure the present by the frame of the past, it is just like asking for the past behavior by the standard of the present, which is out of date.

Tell two true stories. From the late 1970s to the mid-1980s, in our rural areas, almost every household had no fence (using cut wild jujube trees as fences to enclose their own homestead). My house has a doorway, but there is no gate. The dirt road in the village is pitted and muddy when it rains. Although the conditions were poor at that time, there was never a theft in the village. Really? Don't close the door at night. (Because there is nothing to steal)

Not answering the road? I'm not sure. At that time, every household was short of food and clothing. I couldn't wait to pick up a sweet potato, some food and a melon on the way to fill their stomachs. Not afraid of everyone's jokes, once, my grandfather came back from pulling coal from a coal mine (it was pulled by a cart at that time) and picked up five small round lanterns on the way (dozens of lanterns on the fifteenth day of the first month when I was a child). When he came back, he asked my father to sell them at a meeting in a neighboring village, one for ten cents. A woman gave her father twenty cents and took all the lanterns away. She said she would go home and give her father three cents. After waiting for a long time, no woman came back. I was young at that time and didn't expect to be cheated. I was hungry at noon, and my father bought ten fried dumplings with twenty cents for selling lanterns and ate them home.