The real-name system is conducive to the development of social networks. Debate competition seeks to answer questions.

Reverse: "The online real-name system will cause huge costs. Hundreds of billions of sets of data need to be updated every day, which is a huge burden for any website."

Positive: "This is caused by insufficient technology. As long as it is perfected, it will be OK."

Controversial: "The online real-name system may bring more serious security problems. Hacker attacks have occurred in South Korea. , leading to the leakage of tens of millions of user data."

Positive: "This is caused by insufficient technology. As long as it is improved, it will be OK."

Reverse: "But it's the hacker's fault. Technical capabilities are also improving. Once your technology is perfected, hackers will study more advanced cracking techniques..."

Positive: "This is still due to insufficient technology. As long as it is improved, it will OK."

Anti: "..."

This is a joke in the debate - -? This old debate topic just brought back my memories.

The attack and defense questions must be logically linked to the argument, and there is no harm in asking them randomly. Without your arguments and direction, I wouldn’t be able to answer many sharp questions...

Just pick a few:

The country has recently introduced regulations to combat online rumors. A series of measures, and our online real-name system can effectively solve these problems, why don’t the opposing debaters not?

The Internet is the second home of mankind in the 21st century. Real-name system will be the trend in the future. ~ It can make criminals have some scruples. Isn’t this an effective way to maintain security in our homeland?

......

I'm too lazy to fix it. I don't have any arguments. Is there any standard... = =

Note: the real-name system on the Internet does not mean that there is no invisibility. , so there is no invasion of privacy, it’s just the background data for real identity information...