Is it true that the ancient emperors broke the law and committed the same crime as the common people?

National laws have always been formulated by the ruling class in order to rule the ruled class. This is the essence. As for the crimes committed by the emperor and ordinary people, they are all rhetoric, or they are just forced to defend the rule and put the righteousness above the family to tell the world. Throughout the ages (even today in 2 1 century), sober people can deeply feel that the law is designed for them, and those who violate the same legal provisions will be punished by their own economic strength and social status. Confused monks and confused cases happen every day.

The ancients said that princes broke the law and were guilty of the same crime as Shu Ren, because there were many princes and few really had power, but there was only one son of heaven, and he had the final say in killing anyone. It seems that Han Fei was the first person to do this in the Warring States Period. At that time, the king of Qin broke the law, and Han Fei couldn't really cure the prince's sin, so he cut off the nose of the prince's teacher. Finally Han Fei died.

If the legal significance is so, the reality is unrealistic.