The same is to remind you to walk. Yang Ming and the referee are like twins. Fogg is a technology addict. Is there a star whistle?

At the end of G3 in CBA Finals, Liaoning men's basketball team defeated Guangsha men's basketball team 87: 73, thus leading by a big score of 3: and getting the match point. When there were 8 minutes and 26 seconds left in the second quarter of the game, Okafor attacked with the ball in the middle and ran into the defensive Molander, and walked. Head coach Yang Ming and the referee signaled Okafor to walk at the same time.

It's a joke to watch the trivia become a variety show in the finals. Referees still take it for granted too much. Should Yang Ming and Fogg be treated equally?

The Liaoning team's double foreign aid was a serious embarrassment, which became a funny tidbit of the game. At the last moment of the first half, Molander and his little Jiang Wen grabbed the rebound and sent an own goal. It was very violent to defeat Xu Zhonghao twice. In fact, Fogg was the most embarrassed. Today, he had to fight Sun Minghui and let Guangsha's core play only for 28 minutes, and his shooting rate was poor. However, when he was allowed to fight with his teammates, it led to the other side. He followed.

Permission was given to pass the ball on the ground, but his feet really didn't leave the ground and roll. As a result, Fogg hinted to the referee that he was walking. Then when Yang Ming became accustomed to interfering with the referee, he and the referee were completely synchronized with the players in Guangsha. In fact, the referee really didn't have his general knowledge and should be treated like Fogg. In fact, this is selective law enforcement, and neither the head coach nor the players can direct the referee. This is the clear bottom line of the ruling committee. However, Yang Ming had directed the referee to turn hitting people with the ball into Su Wei's block. Obviously, the referee was afraid of Liaoning's entanglement, and even deliberately catered to it. In the end, the CBA finals were turned into Liaoning's own sea. This is the biggest lesson, right?

It is obvious that Yang Ming's desire to perform is not just too strong.

Supposedly, Liaoning's winning the championship has little to do with the referee's partiality. However, in the third semi-final of Guangdong, it was not only Su Wei who was targeted. After Yang Ming's entanglement, Su Weizao's defense was very good, mainly because Liaoning's Han Dejun and Molander played too hard, biting their teeth and fighting with each other. However, when Guangdong was likely to win, the referee resolutely relied on Guangdong's three biased referees to leave. In the end, it directly caused the one-sided finals. Now Guangsha is playing at the last level of CBA. It's really not how strong the Liaoning team is, but the referee's tinkering makes the finals of CBA in a morbid state.

Generally, it is suspected that he is walking when he is allowed to dribble to the ground. Although he is sliding, it is a fact that his feet are firmly not off the ground, so the referee does not think that walking is absolutely in line with the rules. However, the players of Liaoning team are obviously too superior. Yang Ming can command the referee, and Fogg also wants to play big cards. This is the habit. Therefore, this year's CBA Finals is so controversial, and the Basketball Association itself is to blame. It is really necessary to learn a lesson.

Yang Ming, this is not to learn from the referee's

Guangsha players' walking, and the referee finally made it clear, but Yang Ming and the referee made the same action, which is definitely not yet I feel the harmonious heart-beat of the Sacred Unicorn's great minds think alike. This is the bad habit of directing the referee and intervening in the penalty. It is normal for the referee to suppress Yang Ming in recent years, but after the CBA playoffs, Yang Ming's intervention in the penalty is getting higher and higher, and CBA is easy to make people doubt Liaoning's championship.

regardless of whether there is a star whistle. At the very least, it is unnecessary to blow Fogg's technical foul. If you don't walk with permission, you can completely signal to continue the game. If you are allowed to walk illegally, you can whistle and signal Guangsha Men's Basketball Team to hand over the ball. I don't know if the referee blew the technical foul because Fogg was challenging his authority.

There is absolutely no necessary technical foul, which is the root of the contradiction between the referee and the player. If the referee's penalty is fair and just, and there is a unified penalty scale, these contradictions will no longer exist. And the relationship between players and referees will be friendly.