Is it good or bad to control rural environmental pollution and prohibit farmers from burning straw?

Generally speaking, banning the burning of straw does more harm than good. The advantage is that it does reduce air pollution and fire hazards to a certain extent. I don't know the proportion of straw burning in air pollution, but it has always been like this, and I haven't seen much pollution before.

Disadvantages: increasing the burden on farmers, so many straws can theoretically make paper and generate electricity from biogas, but in fact they can't, so they can only be chopped up and returned to the fields. But not to mention the increase of pests and diseases, the land can't be degraded so much, and it can only be chopped up and transported away. It will consume a lot of manpower and financial resources. The state subsidizes a small part, and most of it depends on farmers themselves. Therefore, the ban on burning straw is harmful to farmers, but farmers have no right to speak, which hurts farmers' interests and protects cities. This has been the case for a long time.