The consequences will never be as optimistic as Mu Yaping, a professor at Sun Yat-sen University Law School, commented on Yu Zhendong's case: "The Americans gave up the right to execute, and the Chine

The consequences will never be as optimistic as Mu Yaping, a professor at Sun Yat-sen University Law School, commented on Yu Zhendong's case: "The Americans gave up the right to execute, and the Chinese won back the right to trial, and they won the respect of the international community."To sum up, it is not difficult to see that for Chinese justice, the crimes committed by Yu Zhendong involve international judicial cooperation issues. It is no longer a question of whether you want to kill or not, but whether you dare to kill. And the question of whether it can be killed. Since the world cannot be separated from China, and China cannot be separated from the world, international judicial cooperation must have rules for international judicial cooperation. As long as all countries in the world abide by the principle of "limited sovereignty", the seriousness of Yu Zhendong's crime will not be punished with a light sentence. Not surprising anymore. What is left for people to think about is how the positive and negative impacts of cases like Yu Zhendong can promote China’s judicial reform to accelerate and integrate with international standards. Don’t let the already closed Yu Zhendong case continue to become the final conclusion on the path of China’s judicial imitation. Otherwise, it will continue to cause dissatisfaction among the Chinese people.

gt; Commentary on people's livelihood and people's talk, special planning of Shuzhou Night Talk gt;