Is it more ridiculous to reply to the netizen's "three chapters of the law" than "Qin law"

So the Qin people were overjoyed. China people are all kind-hearted. How can they break the law for no reason? If Liu Bangxian hadn't entered the customs, I'm afraid the laws left by the Qin court wouldn't have survived. What about the theory of righteousness and violence? "

To sum up the above, I think Mr. Huaiyin gave about four conclusions: 1

Compared with Liu Bang's Three Chapters of Contract Law, it is a big joke. 2

In the absence of law, Liu Bang made a temporary contract for the people. three

China is kind-hearted and won't break the law for no reason. four

If Liu Bangxian had not entered the customs, the laws of the State of Qin would have been lost long ago, and there would have been no righteousness and violence.

First, the relatively complete Qin Law and Liu Bang's "Three Chapters of Contract Law" are not just a step, nor do they start here. In the more than two thousand years since Sima Qian, countless experts and scholars have made such comparisons. Countless contemporary scholars involved in Qin Shihuang and Liu Bang are also in this comparison. Has it become a "big joke"? If not, you can compare 1000 people like this. Why can't I compare steps? For example, why did it become a "big joke"? This truth doesn't make sense.

In fact, the key to the problem is not whether it can be compared, but that the conclusion drawn by Cheng Bubi should be no different from others. In the two thousand years since Sima Qian, experts and scholars have compared Liu Bang's "Three Chapters of Contract Law" with Qin's meticulous legal progress, civilization and kindness. A lie repeated a thousand times becomes the truth, but after comparing the steps, it says: wrong, the conclusion is just the opposite. Liu bang's contract is retrogressive, brutal and cruel than Qin's detailed law. When the emperor's new clothes were torn down by an outspoken child, a good-faced adult had no conclusive evidence to refute Cheng Bu and was unwilling to admit that he had been cheated for decades, so he had to say: How can the emperor walk naked in the street? Isn't it a "big joke" to say such a thing!

Actually, we don't have to protect our faces like this. People's understanding is always improving day by day. Only by constantly absorbing other people's useful things to correct their own understanding can we make continuous progress and improvement. When I was a child, adults told us that white paper is white and black coal is black. If we still think like this when we are old, we can't see that white paper is yellow, gray and blue, and black coal is blue, brown and brown. This is the greatest sorrow.

Secondly, Mr. Huaiyin Hou said: "Liu Bang made a temporary contract for the people when they were unable", which is probably inconsistent with historical facts.

. "Make an appointment with the elders, and the Dharma will make three chapters." "I want to learn to lift the Qin law." "It is to let people and Qin officials report to counties and towns."

So I think it may be wishful thinking for Mr. Huaiyin Hou to put in a good word for Liu Bang.

Third, Mr. Huai Yinhou asserted: "China people are all kind-hearted. How can they break the law for no reason?" . To tell the truth, after reading this sentence, I feel a little like walking in the clouds. Thousands of crimes committed by ordinary people every year have never stopped since ancient times. I don't believe you pay attention to the work report of the high-level inspection law of the two sessions every year. The number of murders alone is amazing every year. China people are not all kind; Not all good people commit crimes. However, no matter what crimes are committed by kind people or unkind people, we should use complete laws to distinguish punishment from forgiveness. It's not like Liu Bang's "Three Chapters of the Constitution" that killing people should be put to death.

Fourthly, Mr. Huaiyin Hou asserted: "If Liu Bangxian had not entered the customs, the laws of Qin State would not have been preserved, not to mention that different people have different opinions." In fact, this is still a little obviously partial to Liu Bang. The kindness and violence of the law exist objectively. What's more, since I saw the Qin law and learned about its progress and kindness, I didn't rely on Liu Bang's compassion, but God couldn't bear it. It is necessary to eliminate Liu Bang and Sima Qian's vicious slander on Qin Shihuang for thousands of years, and let Yunmeng Qin bamboo slips see the light of day again. Otherwise, we really have to believe the stories of Liu Bang, Sima Qian and a group of idle literati in the Han Dynasty.

God has eyes!