How to treat the human flesh "shameless female thief", a professor at Beijing Normal University, as a mistake and the defendant's infringement?

Obviously, the professor is wrong. . . Not only is it wrong, but actually I think the professor is a bit mean.

I wonder how many people read the message sent by this professor. If I read carefully, I will find some problems in the professor's vocabulary.

In the message sent by the professor, the professor used a word called suspected crime. Although I often treat others with a kind heart as Mr. Lu Xun said, I have always been afraid to guess the most malicious person. If it turns out that this woman has been wronged, will the professor casually say, I will say you are a suspect?

He himself said that he was suspected of committing a crime, so is the other party really guilty? Before he was convicted, the Peking University professor's behavior was wrong, which only infringed on women's right to portrait and reputation.

I don't know if you have seen some news footage of arresting suspects. These people's faces will be mosaiced until the suspects are convicted. Before being convicted, they enjoy the same basic rights as ordinary people.

I really don't know how innocent the professor is, and I wonder how he is all-powerful in real estate. The other party sent photos to the so-called information, and he believed it. After being cheated, return the human flesh to the other party. If it is really the other party, we still have some understanding, but in this uncertain situation, his behavior is completely wrong.

We all know that the internet is a space that is easy to get out of control, and there are many keyboard players here. In the process of network communication, many people just suffered from network violence and chose to die. In any case, this behavior of human flesh is wrong. As the other party said, it has seriously affected her life. So I can understand that he was accused of infringement.

In fact, the professor himself is also a victim, but he chose the wrong method, so he got himself into a dilemma.