Zhuge Liang, Han Xin, Xiang Yu, Yue Fei, Cao Cao, Sun Wu, Sun Bin, Lu Bu, Liu Bowen and Genghis Khan were all outstanding military strategists. Who will win if they compete fairly?

As far as military achievements are concerned. Genghis Khan is unparalleled. He is a veritable world-class military commander. Compared with others, he can only be regarded as a hero on the local battlefield. Not heavyweight. But you are better than anyone else, but you can't be arbitrary. Because everyone's achievements are meaningful only in his specific historical background and environment. For example, the era he lived in, the army he commanded, his power, the resources he had, and opportunities and luck. Others, such as Zhuge Liang and Han Xin, cannot be said to be inferior to Genghis Khan. They are also superb masters in military literacy, theoretical level and command ability. So we should get them together and join in like competitive sports. It's hard to say whether to win or lose, and it doesn't make much sense.