The Russian-Ukrainian war played a joke.

The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is currently in an infinite cycle. Ukraine does not want to negotiate, and Russia cannot take the initiative to withdraw its troops. This situation makes it difficult for either side to make concessions. But this problem must be solved, so politicians from all walks of life around the world frequently offer suggestions.

Recently, Vladimir bulut, a political scientist at the Institute of International Humanitarian and Political Studies, analyzed that the United States is likely to replace Ukrainian President Zelensky in order to open an outlet for resolving the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

He said that Zelensky's most likely successor is Valery Zaluzhny, commander-in-chief of the Ukrainian armed forces. Of course, it is also possible for the United States to replace Zelensky with someone like Zaluzini, which is part of the American plan.

Bulut pointed out that Washington didn't like Zelensky, but Zelensky stuck to his guns, and this problem came. Zelensky also knows that he will be forced to give way in the future, but the time for power change has not yet come.

Earlier, Ole Denike, a former member of Ukraine's Supreme Parliament, also talked about Zelensky's successor, who is also regarded as Zaluzhny, commander-in-chief of Ukraine's armed forces.

The United States may replace Zelensky. What Zelensky has done recently makes the United States very dissatisfied, that is, Zelensky wants to drag the United States and NATO into conflict.

Philip giraldi, a former CIA official, said recently that Zelensky was eager to declare that "the Russians did it" after the Polish missile attack, which showed that he was pushing the United States and NATO to confront Russia.

Giraldi said that the rocket that attacked Poland came from Ukraine because its trajectory had been traced. In addition, this missile is not in Russia's arsenal.

The former US intelligence official explained that Zelensky wanted to show NATO that what happened in Poland should "activate" Article 5 of the alliance charter, according to which when attacking NATO members, all its members must oppose the "aggressor", that is, launch an all-out war against Russia. Direct war with Russia is not the true will of the United States and NATO countries.

As for ending the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Bruce Fine, a former US Deputy Secretary of Justice, recently wrote for The The Hill that "the United States should withdraw from NATO, which is one of the ways to solve the conflict between Russia and Ukraine". He said that the withdrawal of the United States from NATO will make the existence of military alliances meaningless and end the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.

Finn, who worked in Ronald Reagan's government in the 1980s, believed that NATO became obsolete and meaningless after the Soviet Union lost its enemies. However, NATO continues to expand eastward and approaches the Russian border, posing a threat to its survival. This is also the reason why Russia launched a special military operation against Ukraine.

He believes that without the United States, the alliance will not cause concern in Moscow.

He said, "The US Congress can pass legislation to let the United States withdraw from NATO, thus ending the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and winning the Nobel Peace Prize."

At the end of last year, Russia tried to negotiate with the United States and NATO on security issues. 202 1 12 17, the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced the draft treaty. Among them, Moscow asked the west to provide legal protection to prevent NATO from further eastward expansion, refused Ukraine to join NATO, and the United States and NATO established military bases in Soviet countries.

On February 23, 2026, Russian President Vladimir Putin called on the West to provide security immediately. Putin said that western countries had promised that NATO would not move eastward in the11990s, but later they did the opposite, which was "openly deceiving Russia".

202165438+February 3 1, Russia and the United States * * * agreed to continue the dialogue on security issues in three areas by telephone. However, the United States and NATO have never really responded to Russia's demands.

On February 18 this year, Russia said that the United States and NATO countries were not in the mood to fully perceive Russia's core security requirements. So, Putin acted.

Extended reading:

Media: Many western countries are dissatisfied with Zelensky's "lion's mouth" again and again.

According to reports, the British Ministry of Defence confirmed that Britain is providing modern laser-guided "Sulfur -2" missiles to Ukraine.

According to the related video, at least one tray of high-precision missiles was transported from the RAF Norton base in Brisbane, Oxfordshire to an undisclosed airport.

The British Ministry of Defence said that these missiles are part of the British "aid plan" for Ukraine, confirming the "missile delivery" reported by the media earlier.

Screenshot of video sent by British Ministry of Defence Twitter.

As early as about half a year ago, Britain first provided Ukraine with the "sulfite-1" missile. The "sulfite-1" missile was upgraded to laser guidance in 2008.

The improved "sulfite -2" missile was put into use in 20 16, and its range is twice that of the old model. Its support system can guide it to hit the target by tracking the laser emitted by troops, planes or vehicles, or choose its own target by using extremely high-frequency millimeter-wave radar. The cost of each piece is about 6.5438+0.75 million.

There is no doubt that Britain is trying to help Ukraine against the Russian army. The Ukrainian army will also modify trucks as a mobile launch platform for the "sulfite -2" missile.

In this regard, the Russian side issued a warning that with the United States, Britain and other NATO member States providing Ukraine with more and more advanced weapons, it may trigger a direct conflict between NATO and Russia.

Obviously, Britain obviously shrugged off this warning. NATO is also very arrogant. Recently, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg once again claimed in an interview with the media that it is necessary to strengthen military support for Ukraine.

Some NATO countries have already started to take action, and Ukraine will also receive the mobile laboratory, the 10 unmanned submersible of ECA Robotics of Belgium and the Mantas T- 12 stealth unmanned ship of the United States in the near future. British "Neptune" WS-6 1 anti-submarine helicopter and other weapons.

Kiev experts believe that the new high-tech weapons manufactured according to NATO standards that Ukraine began to acquire will bring "possible results" to the Ukrainian army.

It is undeniable that with the military assistance of the United States and the West, Ukraine has indeed gained a little more confidence. However, the Ukrainian crisis has lasted for more than nine months. At present, NATO, which supplies arms to Ukraine and constantly "fires", is caught in an embarrassing situation of insufficient ammunition.

NATO officials say that the Ukrainian army consumes thousands of shells every day. Camille Grande, an expert on defense issues at the European Council on Foreign Relations, also vomited, "A day in Ukraine is equivalent to a month or more in Afghanistan."

According to relevant sources, 20 of the 30 NATO countries are almost unable to provide military assistance to Ukraine.

Nevertheless, western countries can only grit their teeth and urgently look for Soviet-era weapons and equipment, such as S-300 air defense missiles, T-72 tanks and other weapons that can make Ukraine immediately put into use.

On the other hand, in order to replenish their ammunition depots, they also tried to buy ammunition from countries such as South Korea. Taking advantage of the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war and the vigorous development of the arms market, South Korea signed an arms export contract of $654.38+07 billion this year with its advantages of fast supply and high cost performance.

In this regard, American arms dealer sources call it "marketing blitzkrieg."

In a word, western countries are doing business at a loss. With the deepening of the war, Zelensky is more open than a lion, which has actually made many western countries dissatisfied.

In view of the present situation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, many people are speculating who is the final winner, but at least it can be judged that the western countries have entered a dilemma.