How to collect the "pipeline occupation fee" when some residential areas in Jinan do not need heating? Is there a standard? how much is it?

Residents who do not participate in collective heating must pay the heat loss fee to the heating enterprise through the property company. The explanation of the property company is that although some households do not need heating, the heating of neighbors can also be carried out through walls or heating pipes. In fact, they are enjoying low-level heating, which has caused certain losses to heating units. Listen, does this explanation follow the logic of the hotel owner? ! How people keep warm is not completely tied to a rope of a heating company. Residents who do not participate in collective heating do not mean that they will not be heated. Neighbors' heating can be conducted to households that do not participate in collective heating, while the heat of households that heat themselves alone cannot be conducted to the surrounding areas. Even if residents benefit from the heat loss of residents who participate in collective heating, neighbors who pay heating fees will suffer. If you pay the heating fee, but the heat loss is too high to meet the heating standard, you must be held accountable. First, the house has poor thermal insulation. Second, there is something wrong with the heating pipe. It is obvious whose responsibility it is, and what does it have to do with residents who do not participate in collective heating? In fact, the boss who collects the fragrance fee is thinking: Like your family, I cook by myself every day. How to make money by opening a restaurant? There is no charge for food fragrance, so how can we achieve psychological balance? The practice of charging for heat loss is probably the same psychology. Fortunately, the price department has given the answer: there is no basis, and forced charges are not allowed. So, let's treat the charge for heat loss as a joke.

Answer: Only Jinan in the world has a "pipeline occupation fee"

The radio station JN 2006-11-171:59:10 was released in the Focus Jinan Real Estate Network-Talk Room-Sunshine 100 International New Town Forum.

Yes, I paid the pipeline occupation fee in 2004-05, but I didn't pay it later, so I asked for a refund. The property was given to the thermal power plant, which said it was in the property. At first glance, it is a matter of wrangling, which has not been solved so far, more than 800 yuan. It seems that it is not easy to solve without the help of the media.

Answer: Only Jinan in the world has a "pipeline occupation fee"

Almost the same. 2006-11-1809:12:10 was published in Jinan Real Estate Network-Talk Room-Sunshine 100 International New Town Forum.

Why can it be returned in the heating season of 2005-06 and not in the heating season of 2004-05?

Welcome to visit: jiefang bridge's blog (emphasis: grab the personalized website of your blog)

Yes, there is a charge for occupying the pipeline, which is too overbearing. This clause of the heating company belongs to the overlord clause.

Many users have questioned the so-called "pipeline occupation fee" per square meter of 7.8 yuan. The explanation of the thermoelectric company is that if the user's home does not provide heating, but the neighbor's home provides central heating, because there is a temperature difference between two neighboring households, the heat from the neighbor's home will definitely run to the user's home, resulting in the heat loss from the neighbor's home, so of course, the user's related fees will be charged, just like the telecommunications bureau will charge a "registration fee" after the telephone is temporarily stopped. It is also said that this charge is clearly stipulated in the document 174 issued by the Municipal Price Bureau. For heating users who temporarily stop supplying, 10% of the heating pipe network construction fund (78 yuan /m2) should be charged as compensation for the heating department. However, according to media investigation, the Price Department of Jinan Municipal Price Bureau made it clear that the price bureau has not formulated relevant charging standards after stopping heating. Before the thermoelectric company went to the price bureau for approval, the price bureau never approved it. In other words, the so-called "pipeline occupation fee" currently charged by the heating department has not been approved by the price department and belongs to arbitrary charges. In addition, the practice of dismantling the heating equipment after stopping the newspaper and the need to pay the "hot construction fee" in the form of re-opening an account after three years of stopping the newspaper also attracted the dissatisfaction of most users.

Also questioned by the majority of users is the problem that the balcony area is included in the heating charge area. The current winter heating still adopts the original area calculation method, and the heating cost is still calculated according to the interior construction area, and the balcony is included in the pricing area. The heating fee is charged according to the interior construction area indicated in the real estate license. If the original design is an open balcony, half of its area has been included in the indoor construction area, which means that half of the original design area has been included in the heating area. The calculation formula of interior construction area is: interior construction area = interior usable area+interior wall area+balcony construction area, where the balcony was originally designed as a closed balcony, the construction area shall be calculated according to its peripheral horizontal projection area, and if it is not closed, the construction area shall be calculated according to half of its floor horizontal projection area. It is said that this is because the price department adopts the principle of allocating the unit cost according to the total cost when calculating the heating price. When the total cost is fixed, the allocated area is inversely proportional to the price. The larger the allocated area, the lower the price. Conversely, the smaller the allocated area, the higher the price. Balcony is not included in the valuation area, so the sharing area is reduced and the heating price is increased. However, most users do not agree with this statement, because most family balconies are not equipped with heating equipment, so it is positive and unreasonable to include balconies in the charging range.