Rooster and horse, Feng Huacheng's dilemma

On that day, a reader asked this question: How can we educate our children into a character that meets things, has clear goals, and thinks about everything and revolves around goals?

She was obviously moved by my boasting of Puxin's men that day. I was just boasting. That's not the unique quality of Xifeng, no. That thing is very common.

I'm telling you, this thing has a name, just four words: science thinking.

It should be noted here that not all science students have science thinking, and not all arts students have no science thinking, which depends on their experiences.

Actually, what depth of content I can write does not depend on me, but on the reader. When I go out in one sentence, most people don't understand, so I can only write shallower and shallower, otherwise, I can write deeper and deeper.

to get to the point, we need to know how to cultivate a child's scientific thinking. It's very simple. Look through the root causes of Feng Huacheng's shortcomings in "In the World" and avoid them in the process of training.

There is a man named Feng Huacheng in The World, a poet and the son-in-law of the Zhou family.

Feng Huacheng is much older than Zhou Jiaer's daughter. He can write poems and pick up girls. He was sent to the mountains in Guizhou in the 197s. Zhou Jiaer's daughter searched for love, found all the way to the deep mountains and forests, and wandered with him, which was equivalent to eloping.

Then, in the late 197s, her identity was restored, and Zhou's daughter was admitted to the philosophy department of Peking University, went to study, and then went on to study for a master's degree.

The poet Feng Huacheng also went to Beijing, but he didn't get along well and never had a house. So the couple together, back to the woman's hometown in the northeast. The woman commented on the associate professor and assigned a small compartment in the tube-shaped building. Feng Huacheng, with the title of a member of the Writers Association, was crowded here with his wife.

Their only daughter has been raised by her brother-in-law for more than ten years. Because they don't have enough room at home.

Feng Huacheng's greatest feature is his good face. He really wants to live in an environment that is sought after and worshipped. This is a good name, and of course, it is also beneficial. Otherwise, I won't miss the house for many years.

according to the plot of the novel, the man finally became angry, which, in today's words, became a big V. Then I had that relationship with countless women. Now there is a very popular word, what powder, you know. If you don't understand, go and see Master Xing's Death Judge, the form paper written by Anita Mui.

So, Zhou's daughter, who shared his joys and sorrows for many years, recognized his true colors and divorced him.

After that, Feng Huacheng lost popularity and went to France to make a comeback. He also took his daughter with him. Unexpectedly, in France, the competition in the literary circle was so fierce that no one paid attention to the goods at all. He finally curled up in the garbage bin beside the road and became a tramp, causing his daughter to follow him on the streets.

of course, in the end, the mother of the child rushed over and saved her daughter, so I won't mention the rest.

I take him as an example, because when I was chasing a drama with my wife, there was a discussion about this story that had not been performed on TV, but was in the novel.

In my wife's words, she looks down on love rat, who knows nothing, is still melodramatic and sour.

I teased her. You are also a literary student. Oh, so you said that about your predecessors? She gave me a white look, and I changed the subject wisely. She is a double target, women can think in liberal arts, and men must be result-oriented.

From the perspective of being a male, I can actually understand Feng Huacheng's difficulties more easily than her, or what his predicament is.

I don't believe in fatalism, that is to say, whoever is born scum, in many cases, is fate, or the superposition of various factors, resulting in chemical reactions, which make people like that.

you see, with my mouth open, my scientific thinking is exposed.

In my opinion, Feng Huacheng, a literati, has little room for their existence and growth in a society with developed commodity economy and developed science and technology.

The following words, this metaphor, were not invented by me, but a very famous scholar. My mentioning of people's names will bring unnecessary trouble to people and make people offend their peers.

so I'm bold. I took the C position directly, so you can just think of it as the metaphor I came up with.

What options does a scholar in a high-tech society have? It's just a horse and a rooster.

The so-called battle horse is the horse of the ancient guard of honor. This kind of horse is used for decoration. You are beautiful and stand by for viewing. You are not allowed to bark. If you bark too messy, it will be uneven.

However, there are so many missing horses. Not every horse can be mixed into a fighting horse. As a useless horse, he can't mix the shortage of fighting horses, or he has been fighting horses for too long and is depressed. How do you let him choose?

the only way he can think of is to do the opposite and be a rooster.

The so-called rooster is a joke. The rooster pointed to the sun and said it was called by himself.

The person who said this was originally teasing the rooster, but please allow me to be fair to the rooster.

as a rooster, if it doesn't say that the sun is called out by itself, isn't its value of existence gone?

There is a famous saying in "Yes, Minister". No matter what a department is founded for, in the end, everything it does will be to prove its existence is necessary.

so is the rooster.

The rooster must emphasize that I called out the sun, otherwise it will have no food. Not only that, it also emphasizes its moral superiority compared with fighting horses.

you see, I did, but the horse didn't, so I despised him.

There's another sentence in it, the cock's famous saying, that is, if criticism is not allowed, praise is meaningless.

I'll translate this sentence for you, that is to say, you see, if chickens don't crow at night, won't the sun come out?

hehe.

The cock's theory, no matter how many tricks are expressed, is a famous saying in the workplace in the end: find a necessity for your existence.

I once asked the famous scholar who gave me this analogy out of curiosity, and I said, you are really honest, and I admire this kind of bareness.

But I'm also curious. What I really don't understand is that no matter what you think or what you do, we have all studied physics. If the sun doesn't come out, it has nothing to do with the rooster or the horse.

He told me with a smile that you don't understand the dilemma in our line of work. This dilemma is called: you can't prove yourself.

in an instant, I understood.

The following is my understanding. I will use my own work experience to explain to you what he is saying.

When I was doing software, I was originally a kernel engineer, writing operating systems. We often scold the chip, saying that what you hardware makers are doing is XX, and XX is a dirty word.

when you don't have any hair, I have to verify it on that stupid FPGA. When I run the program to perfection, you can stream it out later. You can't find a bunch of problems, and I'll help you find them. Your question, you can't locate it, I'll help you locate it.

I won't say any more.

Your problem has been discovered and located by you, but you can't solve it, and I have to change the software to help you cover it up. What can't be covered up has become my fault? Where can I be reasonable?

at that time, I had a bad temper, and I rushed upstairs every day to argue with the people on the chip. One day, my boss said something to me and I figured it out a lot.

that's what he said. He said, in fact, people who make chips are more pitiful than us.

We want to verify and know where there are bugs in our software. It's easy. Compile and run, but it works. We can test it every day. Can they?

they shed several hundred thousand films at a time. Can you afford it? If it doesn't flow out three times, the project will be yellow. Three times, one * * * just three times.

If you write code, you can only run it three times. Write me an operating system, and I'll see how capable you are.

I didn't say anything, because male and female servants really can't do it.

those literati, they have a dilemma that cannot be verified. Even worse than being a chip. They have no direction, no standards, no verification, and no chance. This is called no first in literature.

people are all the same. if you want to eat, so do others. If people don't fight horses, they can only be cocks, and he knows it. It's useless. But you have to choose one. Just like Ouyang Feng coaxed Hong Qigong in the Wong Kar-wai movie, make a decision quickly, and soon you will be hungry again ... < P > Eating is an instinctive need of people, and another need of people is to be recognized, or to get a sense of accomplishment and get positive feedback.

We can sell the code, go public and cash it out. I am very happy, with flowers, applause and a lot of money.

what about them? As a rooster, how can I prove myself valuable? How?

there is no way.

then you can only incite emotions. At least, in the process of inciting emotions, you can still find a trace of existence, even if it is imagined. And you have money to take it.

You see, it's the environment that turns Feng into a distortion, and his psychology is getting more and more distorted.

So once Feng Huacheng gets angry, he is eager to have that kind of thing with many female fans. Is he Ximen Qing? Actually, it is not. He's just too depressed. He needs recognition and positive feedback too much. As a result, he finally became a madman and beggar living on the streets of France.

I used to wonder why these people don't write novels. Isn't this a professional novel writer?

My assistant gave me the answer to this topic. He studied literature. He had written a manuscript for ten years before, and he knew it better than me.

He gave me a small test, and asked me to try to write a half-baked novel. After reading it for him, he smiled. Tell me, boss, what you wrote is not a novel, but a program, or a novel generator.

according to my thinking, the so-called novels are logical segments and databases. First, define a lot of characters' names and venue names, which are all elements, get the header file out, and then write logical segments to randomly generate various connections. This is the storyline.

this is indeed programming, this is not a novel.

He told me that writing novels, especially novels, even the kind of cool online novels you have seen, is very talented. It is not to say that anyone can train such writers in batches.

since I can't produce any works, those who study that will end up like my assistant's previous job, that is, copying. Copy one paragraph from the east and one paragraph from the west, copy all kinds of works, and have nothing of your own.

if you really ask him to ghostwrite and chat with you for me, he can't do it. Because he chose a weak iteration before, or to put it more bluntly, there is no iterative circle.

In other words, if you ask him to write today, he can only choose between complaining and praising. Either kiss up or complain.

This is from the media. He flatters. Do you pay? Don't give it, right? Then he can only choose to grumble and stir up your's emotions, waiting for a reward.

My assistant, I can trust him in character. If he comes, it can only be like this. What does it mean? Explain that it is not a human problem.

a person can't grow up if he stays in a weak iterative environment for many years. How long you stay is the same as that of fresh graduates. If you stay too long, you will only become a depressed, grumbling and wrinkled fresh graduates.

The writing styles of the literati you see all over the world are, in the final analysis, born in this way, either by flattering against one's will or full of complaints.

without the experience of iterative progress, there is no valuable thinking, just as a program will never produce results without running.

You should pay attention to this. Learning literature does not necessarily hinder you from forming a scientific thinking. Luo Zhenyu, a liberal arts student who studied for a doctorate, has a strong scientific thinking. Why?

because he is a businessman.

You don't have to like a businessman. Many people don't like Luo Pang. They think he is a businessman selling anxiety. You are right about this. He is.

He is really lying to you, but a businessman who can survive in the market is definitely the product of repeated iteration and verification. There is also something worth learning from a liar.

So by the same token, a science student refuses to iterate at high speed after graduation, so he can't form a science thinking.

Do you know how to cultivate children's scientific thinking now?

it's as simple as running and result-oriented. If your son is an engineer, run the code, no matter how many times you run. You are a great god, but you can't run. Go out and turn left and find an Internet cafe to be a great god.

If your son works as a trader, pull out the list and wait for you whether it's The Wolf of Wall Street or fun run. He accidentally fell into the Huangpu River and planted lotus flowers, and the result is oriented.

it's as simple as that. It's iterative, with feedback step by step and rectification every time. It's hard for you to make progress or not.

finally, to be fair to the literati.