Yuan Dan is coming … so I have to go to the party as a joke. Subject: Don't care about these details. Debate 1 details decide success or failure, debate

I am not good at cohesion, but I have demonstrated both your arguments. I hope my experience can help you. Details determine success or failure. You can give a classic example, because an iron nail killed an empire. You should know this. If you don't know, you can Baidu it. There is another example, about Newton, the apple fell to the ground, only because this detail was noticed by him and gravity was discovered. People who achieve great things don't have to be informal: first of all, they should debate clearly, which plays a key role in the whole debate! Parts are different from details. A section refers to a trivial matter that has nothing to do with the overall situation and is unprincipled. It does not play a decisive role in the development and direction of the incident. Details are the basis and elements of the composition of things themselves, which can not be ignored. I'll give you some arguments and debate around them: 1. Great men are good at grasping the main contradiction of things and will not stick to unprincipled trifles. 2. People's energy is limited. If you confine yourself to trivial matters and spend too much energy and time on unprincipled trivial matters, it will inevitably hinder those who achieve great things. 3. Direction and the overall situation are the main contradictions of things, which play a leading role in the development of things, and the secondary contradictions are secondary. You can't give up everything when dealing with problems. For example: 1. Comrade Deng Xiaoping mentioned: "We should appoint people on their merits and not stick to one pattern, including some eccentric people." How does the other debater understand this sentence? Einstein, a great scientist, is sloppy all day, which can be described as informal. Chen Jingrun walked into a telephone pole, but she won the jewel in the crown of mathematics. Liu Bang won the world in an informal way. 5. Doesn't the story of "offer a humble apology" just show that those who achieve great things are informal? 6. Mao Zedong is natural and graceful, and has won the world. Chiang Kai-shek haggled over every ounce and handed over the country. One more thing, sticking to details will cultivate people into indecisive characters. I chose this from the debate notes. I hope I can help you and wish you success!