Why did the audience complain about the "formal cross talk" couple's performance of homophonic jokes?

Crosstalk is ultimately an art of performance. Its performance method is very different from that of movies and TV series, but since it is a performance, it needs to be learned. This PhD couple keeps saying that they want to create popular cross talk. With his formula, anyone can create hundreds or thousands of jokes without learning. In fact, this is because they don’t understand cross talk at all. They think that cross talk is just one person telling jokes, and it is enough for one person to touch a little to enhance the atmosphere. But in fact, this is not enough, and it is far from enough. Cross talk performances also have their own specific performance skills. How to express skills with formulas, including how to use changes in expressions, exaggerated language and movements, wild imagination, etc. These cannot be expressed with formulas. Human feelings cannot be quantified. If you cannot deeply understand people The changing patterns of feelings, then you create newspapers that match each other. The couple began to use homophonic memes, which shows that they also began to use traditional cross talk skills to perform, but homophonic memes are already relatively low-level for real crosstalk actors. , cross talk is not just talking, it also requires a lot of skills and techniques, such as sanxian and so on. If you don't study these, you would be too naive to think that you can tell a joke and just talk about cross talk.

As a senior cross talk enthusiast, I will answer this question.

I went online to listen to a few crosstalks between Zheng Yu and Li Hongye. I felt that these two people did not have any humorous skills at all. Although they were able to sing and sing in harmony, it always felt weird. Personally, I felt that It is incomparable to the ordinary students of Deyun Society, and it is not happy at all. Some of the burdens sound very ugly and make people feel uncomfortable at all! Homophony is the most important element in their cross talk. I feel like I am illiterate? It felt very low-level, and they kept saying it over and over again.

Take Guo Degang’s original words, I think they make sense. Why can some people speak cross talk without basic skills? Because he is easy to cheat! Da Wusheng, they can't do ballet, but they can do cross talk with two mouths! It is precisely because this industry is easy to deceive that it has gradually declined. The colleagues who hate Guo Degang are actually the same colleagues who do not have the traditional cross talk skills.

I don’t understand those cross talk formulas, but I have been silently analyzing the so-called formula cross talk and whether it is an innovative creative model. Gradually, after all the heroes criticized them and In the midst of the abuse, I thought I had figured out a little bit of the truth. I don’t know if it’s right or not, so I’d like to ask you to correct me when I say it:

First of all, they don’t understand cross talk. It’s more of a pile of words and materials. It is the art of language in itself, and they used what they learned to secretly change the concept, turning the art of language into the stacking of sentences, and worked hard on how to stack sentences.

Then, in their own words, they studied many cross talks, analyzed each good cross talk, used certain symbols for tiles, and used certain symbols for baggage, big and small. Each baggage has a different symbol, and the formula for the basic direction of the program (introduction, small baggage, flat, small baggage, guidance, climax with big baggage, ending) that everyone in the know knows is here. By analogy, new formulas for the changes in the combination of multiple baggage can be derived (in fact, those who study cross talk and say cross talk all know that there is no need for any formula at all)

Then, they use their crazy With their arrogant thinking and their weird imagination, they thought they were smart and changed the meaning of "amusing the audience" in cross talk performances to or thought it evolved into "the audience is amused according to my request". You don't know that a burden is coming. Not ringing is not just a simple matter of throwing it out, it at least includes the foreshadowing, the timing of the throw, the skills, and the necessary appearance assistance and other factors. What is more difficult is to convince the audience at the scene The attention and thoughts follow the actors, and then they explode naturally without leaving any trace, making the audience laugh naturally from the bottom of their hearts. How can these two doctors with facial paralysis come up with this?

The above opinions are only personal reflections and do not represent the opinions of any team or individual. Please correct me if you are mad.