What was the topic of Zhuge Liang's verbal battle with the Confucian scholars?

The first scene is the debate between Zhuge Liang and Zhang Zhao. The focus of the debate is whether Zhuge Liang's words and deeds are contrary to Guan Le's words.

The second scene is the debate between Zhuge Liang and Yu Fan. The focus of the debate is: Liu Bei is not afraid of Cao Jun's "big talk".

The third scene is the debate between Zhuge Liang and Bu Zhi. Bu Zhao first asked the question. He wanted to use Zhang

Yi and Su Qin to belittle Zhuge Liang, saying that Zhuge Liang's lobbying of Soochow was just like

Su Qin and Zhang Yi who only knew how to talk. Zhuge Liang's clever thing is to avoid talking about himself, and use the method of indirect answer

to defeat the enemy with the enemy, seize the opportunity to make a big fuss about Zhang Yi and Su Qin's evaluation. The fourth scene is the battle between Zhuge Liang and Xue Zong. Debate. Xue Zong first asked Zhuge Liang what he thought of Cao Cao. Zhuge Liang pointed out bluntly that Cao Cao was a Han traitor. Xue Zong immediately retorted that the Han Dynasty was "end of days", Cao Cao would take over the world because of "the days of heaven", and Liu Bei's fight with him was "ignoring the timing of heaven" . In this regard, Zhuge Liang seized on the key point that the opponent's argument was not in line with feudal ethics and gave him a head-on attack. The fifth scene is the debate between Zhuge Liang and Lu Ji. Lu Ji's point of view is that Liu Bei cannot compete with Cao Cao. The sixth scene is Zhuge Liang's serious debate. He asked Zhuge Liang seriously, "What classics should we govern?"

It means that if we want to prosper the country, we must govern the classics. If Zhuge Liang does not govern the classics, he is not qualified to talk about resisting Cao Cao and surrendering to Cao Cao.

Military affairs. Zhuge Liang heard this meaning and used the method of exposing contradictions by pointing out the contradiction between the harsh words and the objective reality that ancient heroes helped the universe but failed to cure any classics. refuted.

The seventh scene is the debate between Zhuge Liang and Cheng Deshu. Cheng Deshu regarded himself as a "Confucian" and accused Zhuge Liang of "promoting big talk, but he may not have real knowledge, and he may be laughed at by Confucians." Cheng De

Shu accused Zhuge Liang of "not necessarily having practical learning", which means that a "Confucian" like him does have

"practical learning". Therefore, Zhuge Liang seized on the word "Confucianism" and used the method of adding preconditions to divide it into "the Confucianism of gentlemen" and "the Confucianism of villains" and explain them separately, focusing on ridiculing "the Confucianism of small people". p>The so-called "practical learning" of "Human Confucianism" is nothing but the skills of "carving insects" and "calligraphy and ink", and the example of Yang Xiong was cited to prove it.