Intel asked Yang Li to speak for her. After being scolded, she followed the netizen to scold Yang Li. Why is she so annoying?

Yang Li said under the stage of the Tucao Conference that her stalks are "popular but believed" and "scum" are of course hot, but it is funny to use them on others, but she is not funny.

Many viewers think that this is Yang Li's golden sentence for the sake of golden sentence, and the comedy is not done well, so she is angry, but it is not funny at all.

For example, "scum", the "stalk" that made her besieged. I used to spit Guo at the tucao meeting.

The general idea is: "Slag time on the field is human time." Don't you have to work hard to be a man? "

There are so many hilarious jokes in the whole program, but this sentence really makes people feel "wonderful".

This usage dissolves the aggression in the sentence "man, scum", so this sentence can be refuted less.

Pang Bo also used it, saying that Yang Mengen is a male version of Yang Li, that is, a slag version of Yang Li. But not as smart as the last one.

Is Yang Li right or wrong?

Yang Li's talk show joke "Men have a bottom line" is like "The fall of women in China leads to the fall of the country". Someone always takes it out of context, as if poking their toes.

Yu's original words are: "The level of women in a country represents the level of this country.

Women are strong, men are strong and the country is strong. "Because of the wrong expression, it was taken out of context by you, and the result was almost attacked by all women.

Public figures need to think twice when they speak, because there are always people who habitually find fault.

Yang Li was complained because of the talk show, and the reason for the complaint was quite hypocritical-suspected of gender discrimination.

Maybe Yang Li never thought that one of my talk show jokes could still hinder social harmony.

There is nothing in Yang Li's talk show. It's nothing more than Doby, his male compatriot, making some fun. Men don't even have such endurance. Doesn't this prove that Yang Li's joke is true?

Why Yang Li is disgusting is actually easy to understand.

If her criticism of men is limited and limited, most people won't say anything, but she is shooting a map gun. Driving a map gun, no matter how to cover it up, is disgusting.

If you don't understand the meaning, you can try to put yourself in others' shoes. If a man scolds "you women are scum" on the show, many people will certainly be able to be so accommodating, calm and rational.

Of course, if the program just stays in the program itself at this time, most people will not care.

The real problem is that network boxers step in, praise Yang Li to the sky, use Yang Li to attack men, and even spit out the so-called unrealistic feminism.

Most of the online "Boxers" are irrational, and the proposals put forward are impure, nonsense and divorced from reality, and most of them are just talk.

The original intention of true feminism should be gender equality. The boxer's feminist right is to make a woman a queen, and a man must treat a woman as a grandmother to make a woman happy.

Fighters add fuel to the fire and make things that could have been humorous serious. At this time, it is not as simple as "this is just a joke". This is also the beginning of Yang Li's real disaster, too big to play.

I saw a boxer say that teacher Degang Guo said that "there is no size on the stage". Why do you take it seriously?

Don't talk about Miss Degang Guo. "There is no size on the stage" is the comic actor's own criterion. Teacher Degang Guo didn't let the actors scold the audience.

Yang Li's professionalism of relying on the audience to praise and demote is debatable.

There is also a heroic saying, "People are telling jokes, and you are willing to sit in the right position."

If Yang Li is just insinuating, making a metaphor, or beating around the bush, then someone scolds the street, and you can also say that you are seated accordingly.

However, the "you men" in Ms. Yang Li's mouth has scolded all men, and the directivity is so clear, how can there be a corresponding seat?

The last key question, is Yang a feminist fighter?

Of course she's not. She is just using the opposition between men and women to create heat, and her business purpose is obvious.

Secondly, she just scolded men blindly, and didn't put forward any proposal to improve women's rights, so that even online boxers were inferior.

Finally, behind her is Li's birthday. Without Li's birthday, would she be today? So she is not a feminist.

About Intel, it's not just Yang Li. It's more about generate, an old Intel user with a long history of resentment. Yang Li is just a header.

This wave of Intel operations is very irritating. Please ask Yang Li to be scolded, but Yang Li is still scolded for her endorsement. Neither end is human.

Some people say that what Yang Li said was too extreme and provoked the opposition between men and women.

Why? Because she said "boys are ordinary but so confident".

Some viewers input "self-confidence" and "gender" as keywords into search engines, and many academic research results came out.

For example, a study of Harvard University 20 15 found that the self-confidence value of top female economists was significantly lower than that of male economists.

The main reason is that they know more about the boundaries of their professional fields.

When I stopped evaluating my major, men were much more confident than women. In other words, women are better at adjusting their self-confidence according to their major, while men are often overconfident.

For another example, Harvard University's 20 18 study of male and female college students found that dull impressions make men more confident and women less confident.

Gender stereotypes think that men are superior in many fields. These stereotypes really make men more confident and women less confident.

For another example, the BBC made a documentary to let boys and girls in primary schools do math problems and predict their grades. Boys will overestimate their grades.

I won't go into details. There are too many such discussions. "He is so ordinary but so confident" really points out a social phenomenon supported by theory.

The man said on the stage, "My girlfriend wants to reason with me." The audience burst into laughter.

The university professor said: "The girls' poor performance in the culture class squeezes out the opportunities of boys who are really suitable for scientific research. "

The junior high school teacher said, "When boys know how to learn, girls don't." .

These words are as offensive and insulting as "he is so ordinary but so confident", right? Are the people who say these things extreme? Provoke gender opposition? Discrimination? There is no such evaluation. Why? Turn a blind eye.

It is not offensive, extreme or antagonistic to belittle women's intellectual knowledge because mainstream society despises it.

Step on a woman's talent and IQ, so there is no need to use talk shows as a reason to package it, that is, daily conversations.

Yang Li's words attracted fire, not because she was talking nonsense, nor because she was more aggressive, but because she did not conform to the usual perspective in the traditional patriarchal society.