Joke Collection Website - Cold jokes - Writing dominates human nature.

Writing dominates human nature.

1. Rules and materials of human nature 1. Traffic rules are like human nature. For example, sometimes drivers have to pay for running red lights in order to catch up with time, or traffic rules can be flexible.

2, the company's regulations on being late for work, such as: an employee of the company was late because he found an old man who fell on the road, and called 120 to wait for the doctor to arrive. Is this lateness really late or can it be flexible?

Specific example: An old lady in her seventies met an emergency on the train and was blocked by the flight attendant outside the toilet. The reason is that the train is about to enter the city, and the toilet can't be opened according to the system. As a result, the old lady was covered in shit. In terms of maintaining the seriousness of the rules, it is not only that, but also commendable. However, human dignity and life are so pale and powerless in the face of "rules". Is it the ruthlessness of rules or the indifference of human nature? Montesquieu said: there are two bad phenomena. One is that people don't obey the law; The other is that the law itself makes people bad. The latter scourge is hopeless, because the drug itself contains this scourge.

2. Obey the rules. The composition of the beauty of human nature, about 600 words. They are a gust of wind, quietly destroying every piece of garbage on the road; They are a fallen leaf, quietly falling to the ground, feeding every piece of fine soil; They are a drop of rain, they fly silently, nourishing every new seedling; They are the most obscure sanitation workers in the new century.

Golden clothes, clean white gloves, impenetrable faces and "sweet" sweat soaked their skirts. Pick up the broom, they are a group of white pigeons rippling in the blue sky; Put down the broom, they are a kind and kind mother. This is the most common sanitation worker, the little doctor of Mother Earth. If someone asks me which profession makes me most gratified, I will not hesitate to say, "Clean and kind to the earth's sanitation workers." Close your eyes, I can imagine their busy figure; When I open my eyes, I can see the blue sky and white clouds snuggling together. Open our hearts, we can listen to their most eager calls; Open your mouth and we can say out loud how grateful we are to you. If the blue sky is the earth, then I will say that the dove is you. If the earth is the earth, then I will say that the green grass is you. I, a new generation of successors, solemnly salute you.

Sanitation worker, self-sacrifice, two unrelated words, but you connect them together. In 20 10, you saw terrorists suddenly attack and rushed up for the children. You pick up your usual tools and knock the terrorists to the ground. There is only a thin line between heaven and earth, and life and death are just a little. For the safety of people's lives and property, your great spirit has become my motivation to forge ahead. When you rushed at the enemy with a broom, my eyes closed. In a flash, I was in tears, but you won a great victory.

The most ordinary, the greatest, the most dim, the brightest, the most ordinary, the most special and the least noticeable, but the deeds are dazzling.

3. Let the rules dance with human nature. If a society can ignore human life, what is there to respect? This is what Cai, a doctor of law, said when criticizing some places for advocating "zero collision".

"White collision" was finally denied by the Road Traffic Safety Law. Because of its profound human touch and people-oriented principle, this regulation was widely praised and became a highlight of China's legislation in 2003.

The bright spot is not just here. Looking back on the rule of law in 2003, both legal experts and ordinary people have actually felt that a positive force of rule of law is growing. On the one hand, a large number of new laws and regulations have been stepped up, and all fields of social life are moving towards "rules to follow". The weak "rule consciousness" in the hearts of Chinese people has also begun to strengthen; On the other hand, many new laws and regulations pay more and more attention to respect and care for people, and laws and regulations also pay attention to human nature, and iron laws cannot hide tenderness. From the Law of Resident Identity Card to the Law of Road Traffic Safety, from the Law of Administrative Licensing to the Administrative Measures for the Relief of Vagrants and Beggars Living in Cities, we can see the perfect combination of the spirit of rule of law and humanistic care. In fact, these laws and regulations are also the most talked about topics by ordinary people in the past year.

Rules, this is probably the first sentence we learned to say after joining the WTO. From the institutional level, as small as a community, as large as a country, and even the whole world, we must rely on rules to maintain. Without rules, the so-called Fiona Fang cannot be realized. But for a long time in the past, in the eyes of some people, rules always seemed to be associated with "hard" and "cold". In the process of our rule of law construction, there has also been a tendency to "want rules instead of humanity", as if rules came to this world to make people uncomfortable. Russell once said that people who advocate casting from iron lack respect for people. Rules are rules and regulations made for people to abide by. By restraining people's behavior and standardizing social order, people are guaranteed to enjoy a fully free and happy life. Practice has proved that the premise of formulating and observing rules must be "people-oriented" and the fundamental starting point must be to protect the freedom and happiness of most people.

An old lady in her seventies was in a hurry on the train and was blocked by a flight attendant outside the toilet. The reason is that the train is about to enter the city, and the toilet can't be opened according to the system. As a result, the old lady ended up covered in shit. This is a true story about rules that happened recently, and we have heard many such stories. In terms of maintaining the seriousness of the rules, it is not only that, but also commendable. However, human dignity and life are so pale and powerless in the face of "rules". Is it the ruthlessness of rules or the indifference of human nature?

Montesquieu said: There are two bad phenomena. One is that people don't obey the law. The other is that the law itself makes people bad. The latter scourge is hopeless, because the drug itself contains this scourge. 1843, in his famous "On Forest Theft", Marx quoted a sentence from Montesquieu, denouncing that it was a cruel legislative act for the Rhine Provincial Assembly of Prussia to include the act of picking up dead branches in theft. 100 years later, this kind of legislative behavior denounced by Marx still has far-reaching warning significance for us to build a society ruled by law.

4. Writing about rules, if you don't obey the rules, you can't become a Fiona Fang, and the rules and regulations must be observed. However, rules are made to make people live a better life. If this beauty is destroyed in order to stick to the rules, then the existence of the rules is suspicious. When human nature meets rules, should we put human nature first and pay more attention to people?

Miss Chen took the baby to the car, and the driver demanded to pay the baggage fee of 1 yuan. In my opinion, the driver is really heartless, maybe there is such a regulation in the system, but when you see a sleeping baby, do you have the heart to ask your mother to wake the child up? Driver, where's your sympathy? Can't you forgive me for once? Take a step back and treat yourself as a passer-by. It is ok to pay this dollar for this mother. If you smoke less cigarettes and drink less beer, you can save many such sleeping babies from the pain of being awakened. Can't you do this little kindness? The world should not be so heartless. With more care and warmth, the world can be better.

It definitely means fallacy and excessive harshness, but it defiles the dignity of the law. With a straight face, he charged the amputee a bus fare because he forgot to bring his disability certificate. On a hot day, the staff of the welfare bureau asked the old lady with diabetes to go to the neighborhood Committee to issue a "not dead" certificate before paying welfare expenses. . . . . These are not satirical stories, but real "vivid" examples. Every time I see these news, I feel frozen. It was a real pain, just like being nailed to a slate. I cried out in pain, why has the world become so cold? Is the Tao of Confucius and Mencius just empty talk? Is there no warmth between people but intrigue? In the face of a living person, should we ask her to prove that she is not dead? Besides, it's a seriously ill old lady. This is really a complete joke, a sad joke.

Kant said that man is not a tool of others, everyone is a unique work of art and should be loved and respected; Montesquieu also said that all laws have exceptions. The formulation of laws cannot cover all situations, but laws are dead and people are alive. When human nature meets rules, we should pay more attention to people, people and people. It is beyond reproach to violate the rules without harming the interests of others.

A little more humanity, a little more warmth, the world will be better.

5. The system replaces humanity, and the 800-word composition system replaces humanity. Recently, in a family hospital in Zhengzhou, a man cut himself to death with a knife. After being taken to the hospital, his life was in danger, but the relatives of the suspect, the public security organ and the civil affairs department refused to help.

At a critical juncture, Henan Business Daily reporter Bai Rundai contributed 2,000 yuan to help the suspect save his life. However, this move has caused widespread controversy in society. Some people think this is a just move, but many people accuse it of being a show.

(Beijing News) No matter what the motives of the parties, at least in this case, any moral judgment must first give way to the most basic legal judgment, that is, whether the suspect should get the necessary assistance and not die of injury. There is no doubt that the funded journalist has no legal obligation to help the suspect, otherwise his behavior is just to perform his duties normally without any moral praise.

If it is the most basic ethical and legal bottom line of a society to help all "people who need help", including criminal suspects, then the relevant organs that have not fulfilled their obligation to help are of course to blame, but does this mean that individuals who have no legal responsibility have a priori injustice in their rescue behavior? In fact, on the issue of helping the weak, the "absence" of the legal responsibility of the * * * department does not necessarily lead to the "offside" of the individual's "crossing the line" behavior out of natural conscience, because the two are not simple either-or judgments. Although the construction of a society ruled by law needs to clarify the boundary between law and morality as much as possible and avoid judging the law by morality, it does not apply to private independent choice.

For journalists, this is just a moral act to practice their inner moral standards. For such a move, it not only belongs to the scope of the parties' freedom, but also should be a "more is better" move encouraged by society. No one has reason to blame a man who saved his life.

The moral criticism of any society and the practice of judging individuals by motives are undoubtedly a terrible "critical mind theory". In fact, "the result of saving lives" is the most real motivation and the most irrefutable fact.

The law has a basic belief that man is always the goal and the system is only the means to achieve this goal. However, in this "moral redemption" shining with the light of human nature, the parties were kidnapped by the naked system.

A very important reason why some commentators accuse the parties of putting on a show is that the drawbacks of individual justice behavior are undoubtedly correct in theory, but does this mean that when the system has drawbacks or the executors of the system fail to perform their duties, those individuals who actively lend a good hand should take the blame for the "drawbacks of the system"? The perfection of the system is indeed a scenic spot that everyone yearns for, but there will never be a perfect system in the world, not to mention the inevitable process errors even if there are human operation processes. This is a self-evident fact. Since we can all think that "the shortcomings of the system cannot exempt individuals from their responsibilities", why is it an extravagant hope for those individuals who use their own efforts to save the results caused by the shortcomings of the system, even moderate support and encouragement? In any case, the purpose of system construction is to warm people's hearts, not to extinguish the fire of goodness in human nature.

Unfortunately, in the self-righteous "institutional kidnapping" of too many people, what we see is nothing more than taking the so-called "system" as a false morality for the cold heart. Compared with the brilliance of human nature emitted by enthusiastic "moral redemption", they are so small and obscene. Please restore yourself to a "person" first. No matter what occupation we are engaged in and what job responsibilities we undertake, we should first restore ourselves as a "person" and measure and examine our "work behavior" with the most basic humanity.

On August 30th, a security guard in a shopping mall in Chongqing hit a "lollipop" (commonly known as a temporary porter in Chongqing) because he was disheveled and enjoying the cool outside the shopping mall. This violent behavior was recorded by netizens in the form of pictures and texts, uploaded to the network and even appeared in the print media, which jumped into people's eyes (according to Southern Metropolis Daily). Such a cold scene, * * * people's hearts, burning the nerves of the public.

Prior to this, there were similar "cold-blooded cases" such as Chen Tailin, a civil affairs cadre in ningshan county, Shaanxi Province, and two policemen in a police station in Tongzhou, Beijing ... Today, when people's hearts are good and the level of social civilization is improving day by day, such cold-blooded acts can't help but make people ask, why have the human conscience of these people who originally served the people fallen to such a state? Tongzhou police justify their "throwing people" behavior as "carrying out the orders of superiors (leaders on duty)", while civil affairs cadre Chen Tailin's "throwing people" is an "urgent task" to meet the health inspection. Chongqing security guards seem confident that they are maintaining the "cleanliness and beauty" of the city ... From which we can see that their cold-blooded behavior is * * * However, in these so-called "duty behaviors", Instead of showing their due professionalism and humanity, such as kindness, sympathy and pity, they were replaced by insensitive and ruthless "job atrocities". What is even more outrageous is that they have become accustomed to these inhuman so-called "job behaviors"-they lack the minimum self-questioning afterwards.

For example, an insider in ningshan county, Shaanxi revealed that throwing homeless people around in Shaanxi and surrounding counties and cities has become a "reserved program" for local civil affairs departments. Mencius said: "everyone has compassion ... without compassion, it is inhuman."

If this is used as a criterion to judge people and non-people, then those functional people above are undoubtedly "non-people" because they have lost the "compassion" in human nature. In a deeper sense, the "accustomed" and "insensitive" caused by this unconsciousness is really terrible, because it shows the alienation and loss of human nature.

If left unchecked, in other wider areas of society, there may be similar "job atrocities" that only focus on fulfilling professional duties and ignore the bottom line of good and evil human nature. The highest responsibility.

6. Composition Rules Discussion 800 "You can't be a Fiona Fang without rules." Montessori taught children and grandchildren to be careful and remember, showing that the rules are irrefutable.

Confucius agreed that good deeds should be rewarded by disciples, and those who do good deeds should not suffer. As the saying goes, "one good deed deserves another." This is China's unchangeable theorem. And "doing good" and "doing good" are not as good as the former because it involves not only individuals, but also social interests and moral issues, which are rules.

When all norms and taboos do not exist, how far are you from evil? This is a sentence from the poster of the horror film [Invisible Man]. When a transparent person faces an impenetrable world, the desire buried in your heart is summoned and begins to wake up slowly. So there was the evil "invisible man"

In fact, there is evil in everyone's heart. Once the bondage of evil in bones and muscles disappears, there will be many atrocities in human history. Even under the comfortable rules, there will still be people ready to move. Strive to be an "invisible man"

The suppression of desire comes from morality, which is an idea produced in the long-term social activities of human society and knows what to do and what not to do. This is the central way for me to learn ancient Confucianism. The ancients said: without virtue, you will die, and only virtue will make you strong. In other words, there is no coercive morality.

There is nothing it can do. From this perspective, ruling the country according to law is an effective and practical way of social governance, and the so-called "ruling the country by virtue" is actually a chicken rib.

Because of human nature, we can't restrain the derivative of desire, but the attack of public opinion can be restrained to some extent, which is the law.

I remember the novelist Nathaniel. Hawthorne wrote: In a seemingly chaotic world, each of us is put in a certain position. Once we leave this position, we will be abandoned by this world. "His Wickfield violated another rule.

As Mr. Spencer said to holden in Good Girl, "Life is a ball game, and we must abide by every rule of one kind or another." Yes, we live in this society, and participating in such a "ball game" can only be carried out to the end if we abide by the established rules.

There is a kind of good called evil, and good causes may not have good results. Who is more useful, the moral standard or the social basic system of morality?

7. A 600-word rule model essay:

Beautiful rules

I was nine years old and in poor health. My parents treat me like a dynamite every day, for fear that something will happen to me. My parents often say that I am too delicate, like a porcelain doll, which will break if I am not careful.

No, my father asked the class teacher for leave to take me to tongji hospital, a famous city in Wuhan. Along the way, my father introduced me to tongji hospital, saying that every weekend, the hospital was crowded with people. It is no exaggeration to use the word "sea of people" to describe it. After listening to my father's words, I seem to be worried, because as long as there are many people, it will be crowded. So what should we do? I made a small plan quietly: it will save some time to jump the queue in the future.

I came to the hospital with a nervous heart. What always worried me happened: every registration office in the hospital was crowded with people, and the crowd formed a long queue. I thought to myself: there is no way out, so I have to jump the queue! Just as I was about to implement the "plan", I saw a scene that surprised me. I found that no one was crowded, there was still a certain distance between people, and no one was noisy because of impatience. At this time, I was deeply moved. I'm ashamed of my thoughts. I consciously stood at the end of the line. ...

Yes, my father and I did wait for a long time at last, but I wasn't angry about it. On the contrary, my heart is always full of happiness, because I see the beauty of rules in life and the beauty of human nature.

In fact, the rules themselves are not aesthetic, but only when people consciously abide by the rules can there be a harmonious and orderly beautiful landscape, right? The beauty of rules is ultimately revealed by people; The formulation of rules depends on people's observance and maintenance, which can show the benefits and beauty of rules. In fact, these' beauties' are all created by us. Let's create more beauty of these rules together!

8. The perfect rule of drawing lines in the composition with rules as the topic is the opposition between edge and painting, the mixture of brilliance and surprise, and the birth of strictness and human feelings.

? -Inscription The stream follows the law of "tolerance is great" in the sea, so as not to be flooded; Small trees are infiltrated with the law of "difficulties breed brilliance", creating the towering beauty of big trees; The rule of Eagle Expo that "the sky is high and birds can fly" has made the take-off of "trying to compete with the weather" ... It is precisely because of this rule that nature has built a paradise where "the eagle hits the sky, the fish jumps shallowly, and all kinds of frosty days fight for freedom". Rules are full of brilliance and wisdom.

Appreciating the prism always gives people a cold and stinging feeling, but this is the sharpness of the rules. "No rules, no Fiona Fang" is the call for rules.

There is no denying that Qin is powerful? -The prosperity of The Three Kingdoms is inseparable from the cold rules; The heyday of the Tang Dynasty and the feat of "Zhenguan rule" were also inseparable from strict rules ... History also tells us that the degradation of rules is doomed to failure, and the profligacy of "taking everything and using it as sediment" is remembered, but the tears of the Qin Dynasty are "a torch to the people, poor scorched earth" ... However, the rules are also vivid. The shining light in the rules is also stepped out by people. It is cold, severe and sacred ... but it can't dry up "love" and devour its true self.

Breaking the shackles of rules, we can not only see the cold prism, but also find the best arc among them-it reflects extraordinary light. It is human feelings that soften it, and that light is the amazing power bred in the rules containing true feelings.

People need to have the courage to go out of the box, weave a passionate cage, experience the cold world, warm and cold human feelings, find the perfect picture line in confusion and make extraordinary achievements. In the cage where culture succumbs to power, it is the tree that guards the moon alone in the cool night, breaking the silence of rules and the filth of the world with its grotesque and aloof.

In the rules intoxicated by greed and status, only he can pick out his true self with sobriety and "affection"-dragging his tail and smearing it. Swim leisurely in the fish, swim happily in the soft waves of the water, and reshape yourself in the "rules".

King Gavin performed Zhouyi, Zhong You wrote Spring and Autumn Annals, Qu Yuan exiled Li Sao, Zuo Qiu became blind, and Mandarin became available ... All these surprises spread out on the arc of the rules, giving the saints a chance to breathe and filling the failure in the ruthlessness of the rules. "Loneliness, ask the vast earth, who is in charge of ups and downs?" It's ourselves.

Only by sticking to the most perfect line in your heart in the face of ruthless rules can you build the Garden of Eden of life. Just as Founder's rules need to contain a gentle arc-the simplest human touch.

Although short-lived, it is like a vitamin in the rules, giving beautiful life to the surrounding air; Although plain, it is like a toner in the rules, giving a colorful background to black and white life. Friends, only by boldly adding a perfect arc to the rules can we keep fresh until every spring, summer, autumn and winter of the four seasons; Only by letting the rules permeate the sweetness of human feelings can our paved life be full of chic and beauty.

Lock the focus of brilliance and surprise in generate, and weave the most perfect lines in the rules. Heraclitus said, "Only change is eternal."

Another philosopher said, "Rules are made to be broken." The vast sky where we run is flowing endlessly, but we are bound by reins of one kind or another.

Vivid nature, in the face of one rule after another, changes and degenerates into a complaint-free and scribbled mediocrity. Yes, we need to change, break through this net, and the colors will be brighter and brighter; We need to break the routine, expand the secluded path into a wide avenue, and go to Rome in the fragrance of stocks.

The real seriousness is not the gorgeous form, but the whole and part exude a frightening chill, which makes people shudder. The ivory tower is sacred and literature is noble.

In this land, knowledge has been nurtured and talents have been trained, but if such a vast land only issues passes to college entrance examination students, is it too narrow? Is it too arbitrary to destroy the dreams of people with lofty ideals with the same academic level? Is literature itself burdened with rules and regulations, succumbing to the pressure caused by itself and ignoring the real existence value of literature itself? Why didn't we try to break the routine and recruit talents with strong practical ability and learning ability without making a few things together? This is because our thinking is too slow. Rules mean surpassing and leading.

"Some people always adapt themselves to society, while others stubbornly demand that society adapt itself, and the wheel of society is driven by the latter." Bernard Shaw said.

With an uneasy attitude towards society, reality and stereotypes, they, a group of "unwise" people, cut through difficulties and forge ahead bravely. Copernicus's "Heliocentrism" broke the Christian "geocentric theory" rule; Einstein's research on microphysics broke the rules of Newton's three laws of motion; Lu Xun's Diary of a Madman is to break the rules of stereotyped writing. Hu * * * will break the "land tax system" that has been followed for more than 2,000 years and implement "land-free tax system" throughout the country.

Only by breaking the routine can we have a heart that is unwilling to be mediocre, and we will not turn ourselves into a stubborn stone that is dim and yellow. Breaking the rules doesn't mean doing whatever you want.

From good to good, from evil to collapse. If you are alone, leaving Lang Lang Gan Kun behind, you will risk the world's disapproval, knowing that this is a mistake, just to be a fashion leader, and for the sumptuous dinner in front of you, you will trample not only the correct rules, but also your own life.

Go all the way, and a hearty dinner will be the "last dinner" before the guillotine. In front of the rules, we run and shuttle. Only by transcending the bondage of stereotypes can we learn to fly and enjoy the blue and far-reaching sky.

Break the cocoon into a butterfly and dance wildly.

9. How to finish the composition "Beautiful Rules"? I have benefited a lot and learned the beauty of human nature and rules.

This article tells the story that the author went to Penguin Island to watch penguins return home. Thousands of cars are driving in the left lane, among which motorcycles are riding around. I thought they would all overtake or drive in the right lane (because there is only one car in the right lane), which caused traffic jams and made the author miss the beautiful scenery of penguins coming home. Surprisingly, however, on this road with no traffic police or cameras and only an unconstrained white line, the author traveled so smoothly from beginning to end.

"This is an unbalanced road, with bare roads on one side and dense vehicles on the other." After reading this, I was moved by this "unbalanced" scene more than once and secretly admired their strict self-discipline and noble morality in obeying the rules. No "smart people" tried to break this order, which shows how heavy the rules are in their hearts. However, in our daily life, how many people don't obey the traffic rules and make fun of themselves and others' lives? Aren't they ashamed?

Rules are dead, but people are alive. People who don't obey the rules think that the living should not be trapped by the rules of death; Those who abide by the rules think that the rules are dead, and only by awakening the rules with the beauty of human nature can the rules be dyed with beautiful colors. "When the car goes straight and the horse goes downhill, it must follow the rules. When the green light stops the red light, it will become a square." Only in this way can our world be full of the beauty of humanity and rules.