HQ9 is a copy of S300, and HQ 16 is a copy of Doyle M, right?

First of all, HQ9 is not a copy of S300, and the differences are as follows:

First, missiles are different in size, length and diameter, thinner and shorter than S300.

Second, the missile rudder is different. HQ9 is the gas rudder outside the nozzle at the bottom of the missile, and S300 is the gas rudder inside the nozzle.

Third, missile guidance methods are different. HQ9 is C-band passive phased array+terminal active, and S300pmu/ 1/2 is X-wave passive+terminal TVM irradiation.

Fourth, the tail rudder of the missile is folded in different ways. HQ9 is similar to the integral folding of a standard missile with a square rotating shaft as the fulcrum, and S300 is similar to the slotted folding of a carrier-based wing. (The shape of the tail rudder is also different. )

With these differences, if HQ9 is considered as an imitation of S300, it must be said that all sticks are imitations of S300. Although it is undeniable that S300' s experience has been used for reference in research and development, imitation is a joke.

And HQ 16 imitates Doyle m? Did you listen to Master Ping? HQ 16 is a medium-range missile covering from point defense to regional air defense, while Doyle M is a low-altitude short-range air defense missile, which is completely different!

If these are imitations, that's good. We can only say that your Y planes are imitations of the Wright brothers, and the missiles are German imitations. As long as there is gunpowder, they are all imitations of China!