"Iraq without Saddam is worthless" Do you agree with this statement?

I think so. Saddam was considered a dictator, but this dictator made the Iraqi people live a happy life, at least compared to the life in Iraq before and in Iraq now. When Saddam was executed, he said that Iraq would be worthless without him. At that time, everyone thought it was a joke. But now it seems that the Iraqi people who believed the Americans' lies are the joke.

? ?The Americans said that without Saddam, the Iraqi people would have gained freedom and more wealth. However, after Saddam was gone, the Iraqi people not only did not gain freedom, but also lost their wealth. What did they gain? Then, I gained endless wars and deaths... It is true that Saddam was a dictator, but he also brought real wealth to the Iraqi people, a tangible and visible wealthy life, and good economic conditions. Saddam's oil exports indeed gave half of his wealth to the people. Otherwise, the people would not be so wealthy. It is a pity that the Iraqi people were deceived by the Americans.

I actually think that in the context of religion, culture, etc. in the Middle East, the so-called dictatorship is not necessarily bad. I think the Middle East is a patriarchal society, and systems like those in the West are not very suitable for the Middle East. If the so-called dictatorship can help the people of the Middle East achieve happiness, then it is not necessarily bad. A system that suits other people is a good system.

Without Saddam, turmoil has continued in the Middle East for so long. Wars have continued, and regional terrorism has risen rapidly, leaving the Iraqi people in dire straits and living in dire straits. This is completely different from the Iraq when Saddam was there, and the Americans have gradually withdrawn their troops. Now Iraq is really worthless.