A serious matter should not turn into a joke.

Screenwriter: Liu Zhenyu

Starring: Fan Bingbing/Guo Tao/Dapeng/Zhang Jiayi/Yu Hewei/Zhang Yi/Yiru/Zhao Lixin/Tian Xiaojie/Fan Wei/Gaoming/Liu Hua/Huang Jianxin/Chen Li.

Introduction:

Li Xuelian (Fan Bingbing), an ordinary rural woman, has dealt with all aspects in order to correct a sentence for ten years. In the process of dealing with each other, she didn't expect one thing to become another thing, and then it became the third thing. Ten years later, she did not correct this sentence, but experienced the change of human feelings and realized another truth. The sentence that Li Xuelian wanted to correct was said by her ex-husband. Her ex-husband said, Are you Li Xuelian? Why do I think you are Pan Jinlian? What Li Xuelian wants to tell you is: I am not Pan Jinlian.

| This article is about 2200 words, and the reading time is 7 minutes.

Feng Dao's vote made people feel unprepared. After reading it, you will feel this way. Compared with the film A, B, C and D many years ago, there seems to be no obvious trace of Feng's humor. But compared with other types of movies. This film continues Feng's style in humor. This shows that Feng Dao's style has been carved into his bones. Even after leaving Wang Shuo's notebook. This is still a work of good quality.

From an unprofessional point of view, I was first amazed at his composition. Although many people were not optimistic about Feng's circular composition when the film started shooting. But if you watch this film, you basically accept it, and you are happy to accept this composition. Because you can't find a better picture to explain this thing A vivid landscape painting of China.

A large number of fixed-focus shots and good transition opportunities in the film make the whole film give people a feeling that every shot doesn't want to miss. In fact, many places basically belong to a high-quality picture scroll. The place with mountains and water chosen in the film undoubtedly gives people an ethereal feeling. Coupled with several rainstorms in this film, the plot is even better in rendering.

In addition to the round lens, according to the plot characteristics and development needs of this film. The square added on the basis of the circle has played a mutually beneficial and win-win effect. From the conflict point of comedy, these two unique ways make this drama inadvertently achieve an obvious contradiction. So this film is very clear in concept. Tell an unruly story in a disciplined way. Perhaps this is the final idea of Feng Dao. As far as irony is concerned, I believe many people are self-evident. The director has made a lot of efforts to this end. I am afraid that if a shot is not clear, the audience will have ambiguity. Therefore, we should pay special attention to the control of the ending and the use of lines. At this point, it really succeeded.

In the selection of actors, Feng Dao should be bleeding this time. Basically, this extreme acting school has been stewed in the pot. Just choose one of these people who can be independent. So this movie is already humorous and ironic in the plot, plus the catalysis of these people. You can smell that smell ten miles away.

Let's turn the plot upside down. The following views only represent my own thoughts and may be biased. I hope you can forgive me.

There is nothing wrong with Liu Zhenyun's novel, but it is still a novel. No matter how good a work is, it will still be missing a lot in the process of being adapted into a movie. But drama is different. The drama originally from the stage is obviously easier to operate and more successful under the pressure of adaptation. This is the difference between this film and Donkey's Water. Therefore, after watching this movie, I still think that "Donkey's Water" is the best of the year, which is beyond doubt. This is not to say that Feng Dao's works are not good, but that in many cases, there is no harm without comparison. Who gave up a dark horse and moved on? There are preconceptions, but they are not the main ones.

Secondly, in the choice of actors, I personally still think that Ye Fan is not suitable to be the heroine of this film, because there are many things that should have been expressed by the heroine herself. Obviously, Ye Fan's clothes are not grounded. Of course, it's not that I'm not sure about Ye Fan's acting skills in this movie. You can see that Ye Fan also made his own efforts in this film. I don't care about my image. It can be seen from sitting in the rain that Ye Fan has made great efforts.

But then again, it's still an old saying, "No contrast, no harm." Even if Ye Fan works hard, even if Ye Fan works hard. But there are still some people in this film who are as talented as you. Sometimes, even if you try harder, you will be hit in minutes. Unfortunately, Ye Fan became a target. Personally, I think Yu Nan should be a good choice. Maybe it's a little picky. To tell the truth, Ye Fan's going it alone is awesome.

If a movie always guides you in a seemingly casual way, it is not a good and commendable masterpiece. At this point, Feng Dao still depicts characters in his own unique way. From the naming of characters to the naming of places to the composition of pictures. These are all showing the audience, "You must pay attention, I am telling a very ironic and absurd story. The central idea of this story is irony and realistic criticism. " I think this way of telling sacrifices the fun of the audience's secondary development to a great extent. Although simple and rude, it is not worth remembering. Deliberately stacked with names and lines will give people the feeling of seeing ducks on the shelves.

The other is the circular composition, which explains the tone of the film very clearly to a great extent. But in this way, many people's faces are sacrificed, so many people don't have to speak with acting skills. Even in the case of necessity, Feng Dao's narration was added to relieve Ye Fan's acting pressure. Interestingly, Ang Lee told a very clear story with 3D+ 120 frame +4K, while Feng Guide created a hazy beauty with China scenery. In fact, there is not much criticism here. Because both directors are doing things that others dare not do. However, they did it. There will be as much praise as there is criticism. When Ang Lee used the latest foreign technology to make movies to subvert the revolution. Our domestic director Feng is also pondering his own works in a brand-new way. This innovative spirit of these two people is worth learning.

In fact, all these problems will eventually come down to one point. Why was the film postponed? I believe the film developed smoothly in the front. Why did it start a little abruptly in the back? And the ending also gives people a feeling of being in a hurry, and there is no feeling of being difficult to flow at all. Needless to say, everyone knows this. So I really want to see the director's cut version. Because many times we are under the pressure of the system, our works may not be completely original in front of the audience. And at the end, there are a lot of inexplicable sermons, which makes people want to find out in the director's abridged version.

Forgive my bad review of this film. But all this is based on my judgment after reading the release. Maybe the good is not what I saw. I still believe it should be like this.

Anyway, this movie is worth contributing to the box office. But also one of the few five or six excellent films in China every year. Director Feng has been pursuing his movie dream. Perhaps the sheer seriousness of these older filmmakers is exactly what our new generation of young directors need.