Who has better air combat capability, F35 or Su 35BM? (See clearly that it is Su 35BM)

It's hard to say only about air combat ability, because no one is fighting you in close combat these days. The United States began to hit the F- 14 Tomcat more than 40 years ago, which is today's "over-the-horizon strike".

And the F-35 didn't use it as an air-to-air fighter. The F-35 is only an auxiliary type. However, although Su -35BM inherited the excellent aerodynamic shape design of Su -27 family, avionics and engines still lag behind F-35, especially airborne radar. It can be said that there is a generation gap between Soviet-made aircraft and American-made aircraft. In the background of over-the-horizon strike, the Su -35BM is not more mobile than missiles. The maximum controllable overload of Su -35BM is only 9G, but actually it may not reach 9G, because it depends on whether the physical quality of the pilot can bear it, but now the air-to-air missile is just over 30G…… ... ...

Moreover, it seems that the Su -35BM has not yet served, and many things on it have not been decided, including radar and weapons. It's hard to say whether it will serve in the future. The F-35 has already served, and there is no comparison. Without service, you can say that you don't have any fighting capacity.

Another thing to note is that many people may think that the F-35, as an auxiliary so-called "joint fighter", is weak in air combat, but don't ignore the stealth capability of the F-35 and the search capability of its airborne radar. After stealth, you can't see it, it can see you, and it will find and attack the enemy first, which gives it a great advantage, although the F-35 is not as mobile as the Su -35.