Game king violated history. What?

Passing by is reading LZ's comments, and I don't really understand the meaning of LZ asking this question. ...

In ancient Egypt, there were no slates, no cards, no battles, and no seven artifacts. Isn't it against history to play the king of games? It is equivalent to creating another Egypt.

=

Against the history of ancient Egypt ...

If there's anything to say, everyone's name is there.

For example, Saite mentioned by LZ, if I remember correctly, should be the god of the earth in ancient Egyptian mythology. He killed Osiris, an enemy of Horus, so he also represented fighting and killing. Since it exists as a god, it should be impossible for a god officer to dare to clear his name.

ATEM is also a god. As the god of sunset, he should not be named Pharaoh. Pharaoh originally represented La Shen in Egypt and was the highest god of Egypt and the sun. Horus, the god of the sky, is the incarnation of Pharaoh. After Pharaoh's death, he became Osiris in charge of death ... To put it bluntly, no matter which one is better than the sunset god.

..... but to be honest, I personally don't understand what his name is ATEM. Is it nsw-bi.tj =

= 18 dynasty ruler's real name is Tuthmonsor Amundhotep, and the previous names are pictographs representing a whole sentence. But if the name of the king of Upper and Lower Egypt is Sunset God, I always feel that it is either a cold joke or his loss.

If this LZ doesn't agree, I'd better seek a specific direction =

=