What do you think of the cases in which students under the age of 22 will be tried by juvenile courts?

Personally, I think this practice is not appropriate enough. After all, a juvenile court trial is more objective.

Then, about this statement, the relevant big reports and introductions are as follows:

Interpretation of the Supreme Court on the application of the Criminal Procedure Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) stipulates in Article 436:

The following cases are tried by juvenile courts:

(1) A case in which the defendant was under the age of 18 when he committed the crime and under the age of 20 when the people's court filed the case;

(2) The defendant was under the age of 18 when he committed the alleged crime, and was under the age of 20 when the people's court filed the case, and was accused of being the ringleader or principal offender.

In the "Opinions on Strengthening Juvenile Justice in the New Period", article 6 reads:? Criminal cases in which the defendant was under the age of 18 at the time of committing the crime and under the age of 20 at the time of filing the case by the people's court shall be tried by the juvenile court. ?

Then he wrote in article 7:? The following criminal cases can be tried by the juvenile court: (1) Criminal cases committed by students under the age of 22 when the people's court files a case? .

Therefore, in principle, juvenile courts still try crimes under the age of 20, but for some students under the age of 22, the court may also consider trying them by juvenile courts as appropriate.

What are the advantages of entering juvenile court?

First, juvenile courts usually adopt closed-door trials (to protect privacy and reduce social impact);

Second, what is the main tone of the juvenile court? Education to cure diseases and save lives? (all kind-hearted elders);

Third, the juvenile court can sit at the same table with the judge and talk slowly (the so-called? Round table trial? )。

From this point of view, this so-called juvenile court trial still lacks a certain role, because it basically lacks confidentiality like school cases, and if students under the age of 22 commit crimes, the biggest role of the juvenile court is to highlight the so-called uncontrollable crimes. Humanistic care? . The role of the law is actually to protect the rights and interests. The juvenile court trial actually follows the law, but it will be upheld, which is more difficult for the injured party to accept. Although there are many cases like student crimes, our country's laws stipulate that people over the age of 18 should bear corresponding responsibilities and obligations. If it is transferred to the juvenile court, there will be a lack of dissemination and cognition of actual cases. On the one hand, it is to avoid the influence of public opinion, on the other hand, it is also to protect the privacy of criminals.

However, the law is very strict in many cases. Although everyone has their own opinions, its existence is justified. But if it is really useful, it still needs to be studied. At least for the time being, personally, it still has little effect and cannot serve as a fair and just warning law.