Which villages in Ningxiang will be expropriated?

Recently, Ningxiang Natural Resources Bureau issued 25 announcements on the implementation of land acquisition compensation and resettlement and 27 announcements for soliciting opinions on land acquisition compensation and resettlement schemes, 44 project sites were expropriated, and the houses on these project sites have been demolished. Only the eleventh land acquisition project (No.3 plot) in Ningxiang City in 2020 covers an area of 86.0685 mu in Jinyu Village, Huilongpu Town, involving a construction area of 347.46m_, involving 6 people. Neither the Committee nor the villagers' assembly has the right to go beyond the law and dispose of the village collective land at will. Township administrative organs have neither the right to requisition land nor the right to enforce it, so it is the village committee that cannot requisition land. However, although there are express provisions, there are still many cases in which village committees forcibly expropriate land. So how can we protect our rights and interests? First of all, the villagers concerned have the right to refuse the land expropriation behavior of the village committee and the town administrative organ, and the villagers can report to the local land department or apply for investigation. Secondly, if the relevant departments ignore the legitimate rights and interests of farmers and do not control illegal activities, then villagers have the right to ask them to perform their duties by law. And if the villagers really encounter this situation, they must keep calm, call the police in time, and keep the evidence through audio and video recording. Tear it down!

The ubiquitous demolition slogan is brushed on the wall with a red brush, and the rain can't be washed clean; There is a huge curtain of "moving is money" hanging on the high building, and there is a street with a big curtain on both sides; Shocking people! The hook machine rumbled at work, the air was full of dust, and pedestrians hurried by. In this expropriated village, the demolition of buildings is accelerating, and several people are struggling. This must be meaningless persistence. Friends say developers are smart. When he saw that there was a large area of vacant land in this village, he would increase the collection, because the cost was low, there was no need to compensate so many residential buildings, and it was not easy to deal with residents. The compensation for the relocated households is almost enough. If they take the money, they will leave without being harassed by developers or even neighbors. However, some people want to move back to the house, and the developer verbally said that they can move back in seven years and ten years, so they had to put a big question mark on it.