Joke Collection Website - Bulletin headlines - The crew of "Anti-Gangster" spent money to buy the opening material. Do you think this is plagiarism?

The crew of "Anti-Gangster" spent money to buy the opening material. Do you think this is plagiarism?

This is not plagiarism. The crew spent money to buy it on the platform, and the platform also obtained authorization from others. The plot is like this. There is a friend of Gao who claims to be the original creator, and then uploads this material in her own name. Then the anti-crime crew happened to buy this non-original material on this platform, and then used it in the title, The result was discovered by the original author! I have looked at the two sets of comparison pictures carefully, and it is basically certain that they are the same picture

The difference is that the color temperature and other data are different. If it can be further ascertained that the scene involved in the picture is inside an old house in Taihu County, and the netizen has not signed a "Copyright License Agreement" with a third party, it can basically be determined that there is copyright infringement. The current response from the film studio is that the opening and ending of the play were produced by a third-party film and television company. If there is any infringement, the company will coordinate with the photographer. This website likes this

It allows uploaders to steal videos, upload and sell them for profit. When accused, they throw out the so-called original statement of the uploader to clear themselves of responsibility. Many friends and colleagues around me With such a similar experience of being infringed upon, this website is already a repeat offender. You can check online how many similar lawsuits it has been saddled with. As for the relevant production company, it claims to have more than 20 years of experience in film and television production, but completely ignores the poor reputation of the platform website in the industry and purchases commercial materials for use in large projects at far lower than normal prices. To say that it is completely irresponsible, Does that make sense? The outsourcer will not verify everything one by one

As an outsourcer, when making a title sequence, follow the normal process and go to the material website to spend money to buy authorization. Everything is legal and compliant. As for whether your material is the author himself Is it uploaded, or has it been re-authorized by the original author? Our company is not an artificial intelligence scanning machine. There are thousands of materials on the material website. How can I verify them one by one? I can only guarantee that the content marked on your material website has been authorized by the author, and I can just spend money to buy it.

Given that the video involved in the case does not account for a large proportion of the title part, if the infringement is established, there is a cooperative relationship between the film producer, the third-party film and television company and the platform authorized to play the video, which may constitute joint infringement. According to legal standards, the amount of compensation can be determined within a certain proportion by referring to the remuneration agreed in the entrustment contract between the third-party film and television company and the film studio. Of course, if the parties reach a separate settlement agreement, it will be determined based on the circumstances of the settlement, and the amount will generally not be made public.