What's your opinion about the incident that an Anhui boy stepped on the lighting board on the roof and died?

A 1-year-old boy in Anhui province died when he stepped on the lighting board on the roof while playing on the rooftop. The boy's parents think that the property should be fully responsible for the boy's death. I understand the grief of the parents for losing their children, but in this case, the parents should bear most of the responsibility, and the property should bear a small part of the responsibility.

1. Cause of the incident

The boy who fell from the building was taken care of by his grandparents every day. After his grandparents took the child back, the boy went to the rooftop of the house to play alone. When he found out that the child was missing, his parents' request for property monitoring was rejected. When he was found by feedback from other owners, the child had already died because of stepping on the lighting board.

Second, parents lack the responsibility of care

After the incident, parents thought that the property failed to lock the door of the rooftop, which would cause the child to fall off the building, and the child missed the best rescue time because the monitoring was not allowed. Therefore, they asked the property to compensate all the losses, otherwise they would go through legal procedures.

Many netizens questioned the parents' actions, thinking that the reason why boys run to dangerous rooftops to play is that parents have failed to tell their children about the dangers in daily life, failed to cultivate their children's sense of crisis and self-protection, and as guardians, they blindly asked grandparents to take care of their children and shirked their responsibilities. This is really not worth advocating.

Third, the property failed to fulfill its supervisory responsibilities

Property response According to the fire protection requirements of local high-rise residential buildings, the doors on the rooftop are connected with fire exits, and it is forbidden to lock them privately. Moreover, it is also written in the publicity column that it is forbidden for the owners to go to the rooftop privately, which makes the parents more responsible for this accident.

actually, from the perspective of fire safety, there is nothing wrong with the property's practice, but the property's fault is that its supervision responsibility has not been implemented and completed. The property should set up safety warning signs or cameras or even alarm devices at the entrance of the rooftop. Once an owner is found to enter the rooftop illegally, he will immediately send relevant personnel to persuade him to return, so as to reduce the occurrence of various falling accidents.

At present, the police have intervened in this case, and the subsequent responsibility appraisal will be carried out in accordance with laws and regulations. It also reminds all parents to take good care of their children and not to play in areas with potential safety hazards.