How to evaluate the newly revised wildlife protection law? How to achieve a more reasonable release?

The newly revised wildlife protection law should naturally proceed from the national level and take the overall view as the standard. So it can only be legalized for the protection of wild animals, not for all animals. After all, the public is not a monk.

The reason why this revision can attract a lot of people's attention is because it involves the issue of release. After several incidents in which the "release pool" turned into a "death pool", this revision added a new item: "Anyone who releases wild animals at will, causing personal or property damage to others or endangering the ecosystem, shall bear legal responsibility according to law."

With the improvement of living standards, people begin to pay more attention to doing good and health. Some people choose to set free to do good deeds, while others choose to fast on the first and fifteenth day of the first month. Usually big fish and big meat are too rich. Eating vegetarian food occasionally is not only good for your health, but also equivalent to doing good deeds (not "killing").

But if you must choose to release to do good, how can you release it reasonably?

Then what needs to be remembered is that you should never release it at will, but look for "organization". Of course, in the process of searching, we should do some "investigation" to avoid the "organization" being out of compliance, and finally release it as "seeking life"

Only a truly standardized organization can achieve reasonable release, and the released animals can get the best placement.