The old man stole steel bars and was smashed into a vegetative state, and his family claimed 2 million yuan from the construction site. How is the law handled?

Liu Dong Road Police Station received an alarm, saying that his father-in-law was smashed into a vegetable by the fence of the construction site, and his family faced huge medical expenses, but the construction site ignored him!

After receiving the police, the police found that the old man described by the woman was the protagonist of the accident. According to the onlookers at that time, the old man was found buried in a pile of bricks and could not move. They immediately called the emergency number and called the police. After a follow-up investigation, the police called the construction unit manager Zhang and the old man's daughter-in-law Su to the police for mediation, so as to better understand the situation.

Manager Zhang reflected that the old man did not dump the sundries piled up on his construction site, but stole the steel bars and was dumped. The construction site belongs to the built living area, and because of the relevant regulations, the transformer room on the construction site cannot be dismantled without permission after the transformer is dismantled, so it has been left in place, waiting for subsequent treatment. On the day of the incident, the old man privately came to the construction site to steal steel bars and forcibly demolished the intact distribution room, resulting in the collapse of the wall and its collapse.

Although Su obviously disagreed with this explanation, he was speechless after the police took out tools such as sledgehammers and shovels used by the elderly to steal steel bars. The police then proposed in mediation that it was an obvious theft for the old man to smash himself on the intact wall of the construction site. The construction site is not willing to pursue it now. After sending the old man to the hospital, he also paid part of the medical expenses and made humanitarian compensation of 50,000 yuan. I hope that the family members will stop here, otherwise it may not be worth the candle.

Family members believe that the construction site should bear the responsibility, but Su Mou suggested at this time that even if the old man stole the steel bar, something happened on the construction site and it was knocked down by the wall of the construction site, and the construction site was obviously responsible. The construction unit did not have any warning and fence at the scene of the incident, and no one patrolled, and did not fulfill its security obligations, and it has an unshirkable responsibility for the accident of the elderly.

Subsequently, Sue put forward her own solution. Either the construction site will compensate the elderly for all their medical expenses, or they will compensate themselves for two million yuan at a time, otherwise they will never accept mediation and will not leave it at that.

At the construction site, Manager Zhang also flew into a rage at the unreasonable demands of women. He lost 50 thousand yuan because he was stolen by a thief. Now the other party is not only ungrateful, but also blatantly demanding compensation of 2 million yuan, which is obviously unacceptable. Later, the construction site also said that it was unwilling to accept mediation. Women can sue them through legal channels, and they will accept whatever the verdict is.

How is the law handled? There are two main legal issues in this case: 1. Should thieves be responsible for injuries? 2. Does the website need to take responsibility?

As for the act of beating a thief after catching a thief, most people now know that it is not self-defense and should be investigated for responsibility. So what if you set a trap to protect your property and hurt the thief?

In fact, China also applies the principle of fault liability to this kind of liability. If the thief is injured, the owner sets a trap in advance, which belongs to "early prevention". If the owner is at fault (for example, deliberately placing hidden poison next to the property), the owner still has to bear certain responsibilities.

In this case, there are no warnings and fences on the construction site. If the old man is injured while stealing the shelved things (such as bricks erected by the roadside) under normal circumstances, the construction site may indeed bear certain responsibilities. Because in this case, the burden of proof is rarely reversed, and the website needs to prove that it is not at fault. It does have the responsibility to warn the construction site where objects are put on hold and hung.

But in this case, the old man smashed the house with a sledgehammer and stole steel bars, which means the building collapsed. Of course, there is no warning responsibility for the completed housing site. Moreover, the building on site is a power distribution room, which has been tested by relevant departments and has no quality defects. Therefore, there is no responsibility or fault in the construction site in this case. If he wants, he can even counterclaim that the other party will return the prepaid medical expenses.

For the criminal aspect, the amount of theft by the elderly is too small, which belongs to the category of public security management, and has been seriously injured and difficult to treat, so it is naturally impossible to increase the punishment.