Joke Collection Website - Bulletin headlines - What is the reason why the tennis prince and the basketball prince of sunspot are treated differently?

What is the reason why the tennis prince and the basketball prince of sunspot are treated differently?

I think the first part is "unscientific ability". We should correct it first. The early King of Tennis was really a serious cartoon about tennis. The tennis king became popular long before he was unscientific, and the disappearance of the black basket on the court was explained by misleading at the beginning. As we all know, the later period, no, can't be regarded as the later period. The appearance of the green room in the middle of the first season has broken the forced explanation. So the starting point of the two is different.

I don't deny the handsome element, but I can't fully recognize it. In the painting style of the era of 1999, the figure of Wang is indeed a beautiful figure that is rare in blood, which undoubtedly increases his popularity. Especially when the plot and tennis failed later, the more beautiful characters appeared, and the popularity was largely maintained. However, it was once called "a cartoon that set off the tennis craze in Asia", and it can't be decided by beautiful figure alone. The combination of early tennis and real tennis, unique male character and full description of personality are all worthy of praise. Compared with the black basket, it highlights the expression of the protagonist too much, and the portrayal of the role of the net king other than the protagonist is now worth learning from the younger generation. Regarding the black basket, first of all, I want to say that comics and animation are day by day, and take the most straightforward comparison:

If most of the popularity of Black Basket comes from handsome characters, it is undeniable that the success of animation and the era in which he lives are doomed to its popularity, but I also hope you can take it seriously. The difference between the black basket and most animations is that it is an auxiliary action of storytelling, and the black basket itself tells a very complete story, taking into account the rhythm of storytelling. It can be said that the author is a serious newcomer, although his painting skills are far less than those of his predecessors. The split shot is too formal, but it is really a synthesis within his own ability, and the story itself is very juvenile, so in fact, the gender ratio of black basket fans is quite balanced, and it is too subjective to rely on handsome guys.

As for selling rotten fire, with all due respect, this is an attack on the original work. It's normal not to think with those thoughts. Vague words such as fetters are really the main reason for people to rot, but I can't agree with this kind of fire, and even the order may be wrong. Compared with selling rotten fire, I think both belong to fire first and then rot. If there is the opposite situation, it can't be said to be the general situation of the public. The above cartoons mainly focus on the black basket. The animation of black basket makes good use of commercial elements. Picture music and the practice of launching fan discs from time to time have kept his popularity above a limit, not to mention spending a certain amount of money on the most important sports scenes of animation (CCTV is too lazy to take them out, as you all know).

), Wang Wang is even more popular when he can't complete the number of black basket frames, and even takes characters to bump into various bugs in the plot from time to time. You can imagine how remarkable his advantage was at that time. The subject's question can be said to directly deny all other advantages of the two cartoons. All the above are personal opinions.