Debate: Which is more important, accumulating knowledge or shaping personality (opposite side)

Question: In today’s society, where exam-oriented education is at its peak, what is needed is people with extensive knowledge, so students from Tsinghua and Peking University can always find jobs more easily. Is it possible that their personality Does it have to be very good? Does it mean that we students who have graduated from higher vocational colleges must have poor personality? Although our knowledge is not as good as others, we will lose in comparison with others in terms of personality? Refutation: But what’s the use of having a higher personality? What this society needs is knowledgeable people. The first thing the boss looks for when looking for someone is your knowledge, not your personality~~ Both seem to be important, but the title It requires the fundamental mission of education in our country within the scope of schools: to cultivate high-quality workers, professionals and a large number of top-notch innovative talents, that is, to cultivate people with all-round development of morality, intelligence, body and beauty, and to continuously enhance the social competition of our college students. force. Relatively speaking, as long as you learn this knowledge thoroughly in school, your personality will not be that low. Question: Now schools are launching ideological and moral training courses. Ref: Doesn’t it require knowledge to cultivate ideological and moral concepts? What is knowledge? Apart from professional courses, it does not count as knowledge? I also ask you, without psychological knowledge, what do you think and what do you use? Is there no order of precedence? Good character can be found just by sitting there? What is a good character, and where do the criteria for judgment come from? Isn’t it necessary to judge by knowledge? Can the personality developed in college withstand the impact of entering society? A personality that is not supported by theoretical rationalization of one's own mind is unstable and fragile. If personality cultivation is more important, how do you show that this is more important? Do you spend more time cultivating personality? How to cultivate? What are the practical actions? Read ideological and moral books? Help the old lady cross the road? How many people can you help in a day? Refutation: I disagree with the other party's point of view. Can you see a person's knowledge? Once you have the knowledge, will he still run away? Personality is changeable. In a person's life, good can turn to evil. , can also turn from evil to good. The shaping of personality is not a day's work, it requires a lifetime of hard work, and university is the best time for people to accumulate knowledge, so don't waste your time. Question: Many people say that Liu Haiyang and Ma Jiajue Morality is very important, so I would like to ask where your morality comes from? Refutation: Was it only cultivated during the four years of university? So does the other party think that those who have not yet gone to college are morally inferior? As we all know, our moral character begins when we are babbling. There are more than a million students in China's universities. Liu Haiyang and Ma Jiajue are just two of a million students. Do we need to look at the world in a small way? This is really knowing one thing but not knowing the other. He just has too little knowledge about psychological adjustment. Why shouldn't such a person accumulate knowledge and use the air to shape his personality? "I would like to ask, what is the use of having strong psychological knowledge if it is not better thought and used. The accumulation of knowledge is not enough, so there is a tragedy. Pay attention to the accumulation of knowledge, achieve the sublimation of personality, and only qualitative changes can lead to quantitative changes. Only through quantitative change can you have personality. Don't put knowledge in a secondary position. Therefore, knowledge is the foundation and it is the key. Therefore, the accumulation of knowledge is more important. Our debate today is not how to accumulate knowledge but which is more important. The important question is: Some people say that personality is the basis of knowledge. This statement is completely wrong. How can a person distinguish between right and wrong if he does not have knowledge as a basis? Refutation: The ancients have long said: Why is reading nothing more than distinguishing between black and white? It's just right and wrong. If no one tells a child that it is wrong to take other people's things without their permission, then we can only imagine what the child will become in the future... Question: Corrupt officials say corrupt officials refute: So let me ask these people They went through many moral tests before becoming officials. Are they not moral enough? Absolutely not. We also invited the other party to debate a question. What we are discussing is how they will develop after becoming officials. When they graduate. Please don’t go off topic. Question: Many people don’t come back after going abroad. Is going abroad a moral issue? Ref: Going abroad is a big problem for most people. But Einstein went abroad. Can you say that he has low morals? So what is your main task as a student in these four years? If a person forgets his own tasks, how can he talk about morality? If a college student does not pick up the pieces after graduation, he only knows a few professional knowledge.

Ask about how the country develops, how the world advances, and how mankind progresses: Some people say that high-tech crimes are refuted: So for those who arrest high-tech crimes, how do you explain why the direction of life of high-tech crimes is distorted? Because the accumulation of knowledge in ideological education is not enough! Read "The Analects of Confucius" every day, and your conscience will be whipped and your thoughts will be sublimated. Q: The purpose of the university, the mission of the university. Refutation: The purpose of universities: to rejuvenate the country through science and education, science and technology is the primary productive force, and knowledge economy. If the main function of universities is to cultivate personality, then there is no need for them to come to university again. What is our purpose when we come to university? It's learning! What is learning? The accumulation of knowledge. Is it okay for the opponent to argue with his classmates and build his character at home? And at home, can you learn the professional knowledge you learn in school? First of all, I want to say that I do not deny that college students in school shape their own personality. What we are talking about today is which is more important. The reason is very simple. Our technology cannot keep up. As the future successors of China, we have no reason not to study hard and strive to master knowledge to compare with others. Therefore, I think we should learn more knowledge and master knowledge. Besides, we have been in elementary school since we were in elementary school. Being instilled with the idea of ??learning how to be a human being, today's college students can be said to be adults, so that golden time has passed. Moreover, the more we learn, the more we understand, and the more we want to improve our human qualities. Wen: Since the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the Party Central Committee has put forward the strategy of strengthening the country through talents, a century-old plan based on education. Refutation: The fundamental task of education: to cultivate high-quality workers, specialized talents and a large number of top-notch innovative talents, that is, to cultivate moral, intellectual, and The party’s education policy requires universities to adhere to education to serve the socialist modernization drive, serve the people, integrate it with productive labor and social practice, and cultivate high-quality students. Builders and successors. In the process of cultivating talents, the school is all about the growth and development of students. The current competition among colleges and universities is also the competition for talent cultivation, which is reflected in the social competitiveness of the talents cultivated by colleges and universities. Question: In society. How to refute: For a school, the most important thing is the students, and for a student, the most important thing to enhance one's social competitiveness is professional course knowledge. If a person does not even master the most basic things, How can we talk about gaining a foothold in society? Take our current society as an example. Each job position has specific requirements, and most units will fill in the most basic requirements: **academic degree or above. This This shows the importance of a person's professional knowledge to a person facing social competition. In other words, knowledge learning is the most basic task and the most important task for college students. Question: Character determines a person's destiny: Speaking of which It’s a cliché, but it’s true from my personal experience: Ninety percent of a person’s success depends on his personality, what kind of person he is, and what he wants to be. Instead of being determined by the remaining 10% of professional knowledge, there have been many people who, when their opportunities came, were not able to do so because they did not have sufficient professional knowledge and competent abilities. Don't give up helplessly. Question: Sima Guang said in his "Zi Zhi Tong Jian" that talent is the source of virtue, and virtue is the commander-in-chief. Isn't the commander more important? ! ? Refute: The meaning of personality in ＜＜Modern Chinese Dictionary＞＞, but ability is not the same as knowledge. No one learns knowledge for the sake of learning knowledge! Just like the soldiers and commanders in the army. The soldiers are the basis of the army. The commander organizes many of these soldiers to form combat effectiveness. A commander can lead thousands of troops, but he cannot replace thousands of troops. If we take a single soldier and a commander as a In comparison, perhaps the commander is more important, but what Sima Qian said in his sentence should be a collection, which is equivalent to the soldiers of the entire army. In this case, whether the commander or the soldiers is more important is another matter. Besides, he did not focus on which side because It is difficult to balance the results of such a problem, and the actual situation needs to be analyzed in detail. Question: Han Traitor Refutes: So I think as a college student, we should pay more attention to the accumulation of knowledge, which of course includes science and technology, literature and art, etc.

Personality is generally based on a certain amount of knowledge. Although there are some exceptions, it is mostly like this. In the late Qing Dynasty, although the people were not very noble, they were still honest and responsible. What was the result? Aren't you enslaved by foreigners? Why? It is because there is no science and technology. Why there were so many traitors during the Anti-Japanese War? I think a large part of the reason is that China's knowledge level is too low, resulting in low quality. Most of them do not understand what patriotism is. For example, the United States launched its war against Iraq because the country was poor and did not have a high level of knowledge. During the war, the poor Iraqis did not even have enough to eat and their lives were on the line. What kind of personality did they have to learn all kinds of knowledge? If you don't need the personality that is used to cultivate your sentiments, improve your quality, and improve your own personality, then what else do you need knowledge for? The relationship between the two should be that we have to constantly learn knowledge because we want to perfect our personality. But from the perspective of the chicken laying the egg and the egg laying the chicken, if the formation of personality is not innate but definitely cultivated. , accumulating knowledge is more important than shaping personality. Without the accumulation of knowledge first, there is no way to talk about personality shaping. The process of making the right choice to accumulate knowledge is the process of shaping personality. When personality deviates from knowledge, it is usually due to improper selection of knowledge. So the key is whether you can choose knowledge correctly in the process of accumulating knowledge. If you choose correctly, personality shaping will not deviate. There is nothing wrong with knowledge. The problem lies in the system that uses knowledge structures. Furthermore, the word "personality" needs to be clarified in its specific direction. The statement "shaping personality" itself has problems. What kind of personality is being shaped? Good personality or bad personality? Does personality mean the meaning of personality in psychology, or does it refer to the meaning of personality in theory? The formation of a good personality requires the accumulation of knowledge. How can you know what a good personality is without knowledge? I think you don’t understand anything about personality. Take your own country as an example. In the past few hundred years, everywhere Do you know what it means to be bullied by other countries? It is not a lack of knowledge or technology. At that time, would it be useful if you had personality? It wouldn’t be to trample you underfoot, so my point of view is that knowledge is more important than personality. Question: The purpose of people receiving education. Refutation: It is to have a clearer understanding, to be closer to the truth, and at the same time to strengthen one's ability to control oneself, cultivate oneself, understand and transform the world. The mission of higher education is to cultivate senior professionals with innovative spirit and practical ability, develop science, technology and culture, and promote socialist modernization. Should college students focus on accumulating knowledge or shaping personality? Whichever is more satisfying the purpose of education and which is more in line with the tasks of higher education. Personality refers to an individual's moral quality, which is the sum of a person's temperament, ability, character and other characteristics. Obviously, the shaping of personality is based on the accumulation of knowledge. In current education, students' physical and mental, academic, and personality development are not harmonious enough, and there are very complicated reasons. But as far as education itself is concerned, to a large extent, it stems from the failure to effectively and scientifically coordinate the deep-seated contradictions between students' physical and mental, academic, and personality. In education, intentionally or unintentionally, the development goal is to simply improve students' academic level at the expense of students' physical and mental health and personality perfection; or one-sidedly understands students' academic success or failure as the only content and highest standard of student development. tendency is not an isolated phenomenon. Q: Use scores first to evaluate students. Refutation: What we are discussing now is the accumulation of knowledge. The other debater confused the concepts of knowledge accumulation and scores. Q: As a result, the crime rate of highly educated talents such as graduate students and doctoral students is higher than that of ordinary people with ordinary education. The crime rate is high because there is too much emphasis on academic qualifications and knowledge and neglect of education in personality and moral quality, leading to high-tech crimes! Refutation: If you want to discuss it this way, I would like to ask whether the crimes committed by many very knowledgeable people are personal mistakes or legal mistakes that are not tolerated by society. Question: Everyone in the schools where "Learn to Survive" and "Learn to Be a Man" have seen a similar slogan: "Learn to be a man, learn to live, learn to learn, learn to develop."; Refutation: The education slogan proposed by the United Nations for the 21st century is : "Learning to be" (Learning to survive). In China, "Learning to be" is translated as "learning to be a human being". As for "being a human being", in Chinese, "being a human being" has only two meanings: one is to treat others; the other is to be a decent person. People must live in social groups. It is indeed difficult for people who don’t know how to behave to “survive”. It can be seen that "being a human being" is simply confused with "survival".

Question: How is your character formed? How to shape it? Refutation: The personality system is very large, including three major systems. It includes the characteristics of control, tendency, and psychology. The psychological characteristics mentioned to us include personality, ability, temperament and other things. There is a saying: "Three-year-olds look older, seven-year-olds look older." This is a very representative statement summed up by ordinary people in real life, and this statement exactly reflects a person's influence on a person's personality in his childhood. important stage of growth. How do big universities shape it? Question: Children’s education methods. Refutation: When we give love to children, we actually want them to develop healthily, not simply to protect and love them. For example, it turns out that when we see our child fall, we parents quickly run over to see if it is broken? Did it hurt from the fall? Wait. Being protected by so many people makes children lack freedom, which is also a bad thing. So when it comes to the degree and amount of protection, when it appears, and how we treat it, we have to grasp it very well. Some parents take great care of their children. When their children do something, they always remind them to pay attention to this, pay attention to that, don't make clothes dirty, don't break things, etc. We can see that the formation of personality is related to some errors in our subjective desires, our educational attitudes, and our educational methods. Of course, the formation of personality is not just about these aspects, there are many other aspects. Question: Knowledge is the first purpose of going to college. Refutation: After we go to college, we are divided into various departments and majors based on different employment directions and courses. However, people are not assigned to different choleric or sanguine majors because of their different temperament types and accomplishments. When we come to college, we need to earn credits for the accumulation of knowledge and graduate. As for personality, the school believes that most students have no problems. If there are any problems, they will be detained in school for investigation. Of course, when a student has both ability and political integrity, the school will encourage him with scholarships. However, in most schools, the proportion of intellectual education points is much higher than that of moral education. First of all, there is no one more important between knowledge and personality. Secondly, I think a person’s knowledge accumulation determines the level of the person, and almost determines his future. Career development, and the university stage is a critical period for a person to form his or her own knowledge system, which must not be delayed. This is also the most important function of all universities; in contrast, the function of universities in shaping personality is relatively secondary. Finally, I also think that the factors that form personality are extremely complex, and the role of the university environment is limited and not decisive. Generally speaking, a person's personality has been finalized by the age of 20. It won’t be much different when you reach 20. Could it be that many people have undergone drastic changes in these 4 or 5 years? College is a very relaxed time in which you can determine your own interests and learn what you like. Whether it is within or outside your major, from books or in real life, it will be of great use in the future. Personality is relatively malleable in childhood. If it is fixed at that time, it will be difficult to change it in college. Question: The definition of "university" is refuted: it means to learn more and something - these things mainly refer to professional knowledge, which require us to learn at a deeper level to serve the society in the future; students' bounden duty is to learn, and these are the main It is for the accumulation of knowledge. Our parents and teachers have been educating us in terms of educational knowledge and personality from childhood to adulthood at the same time. College is nothing more than cultivating and shaping personality, and personality shaping is what a person needs throughout his life from childhood to adulthood. It does not mean that we must focus on shaping it in college. Maybe a person's personality is shaped when he is very young. It’s almost finalized; but of course the further study and accumulation of knowledge must be in college! ! ! Although we live and learn, the most important stage of learning is the accumulation of knowledge in college (this accumulation includes the accumulation of self-study ability, accumulation of book knowledge, accumulation of hands-on ability, accumulation of communication skills, etc.) , used to build the cornerstone for oneself to move towards society. Because the topic emphasizes the relationship between the two in the university and highlights the word "change", this is undoubtedly an accumulation of knowledge for college students. (Situations that do not include special cases: it means that the personality is very bad and needs to be shaped urgently. Otherwise, it is the other party's point of view: "The higher the education level, the more dangerous it is." The special cannot be suitable for the general. We must grasp the main group of people.) Personality shaping is life The ultimate goal, all efforts in life are to shape a personality with distinctive individual characteristics. In terms of the importance of accumulating knowledge and shaping personality, they are not on the same level.

But as a college student, in a specific time period of 4 years in college, I think accumulating knowledge is more important than shaping personality. The shaping of personality runs through a person's life, and the results are not determined by a certain period of time. I even think that the nearly twenty years before college career played a decisive role in shaping personality. Isn't there an old saying called "three Do you feel old when you are older?” However, the four years of college study are the golden four years that cannot be copied in life. If you miss it, you will miss it. The pressure of work and family pressure after graduation have made the purpose and environment of study difficult. There is no laxity like in college. At least college students don’t have to worry about mortgage loans and children’s education expenses. The cruelty of the objective social environment determines the importance of knowledge. Without knowledge, you cannot make a living; without knowledge, you cannot support your family; without knowledge, you cannot serve the country. So how can you talk about the shaping of personality when you cannot make a living, support your family, and govern the country? The end of the means can only be a castle in the air. Theoretically, in primary school and middle school, key personality and moral education should be carried out. The basic knowledge system is enough, and in-depth study and research should be carried out in university. And in the current education, primary and secondary school students spend all day not knowing what they can use in the future. How much knowledge I have working overtime seven days a week, but the ideological education is so lacking that I have to go to university to make up for classes. Accumulating knowledge in university is the most important thing. But the knowledge I am talking about is more focused on "experience". Just rely on those two You won't learn much from this outdated textbook. As for personality, if you take a class in kindergarten and do everything the teacher says, your personality won't be that bad. It's too late because of many human habits. In fact, it is formed by the subtle influence of parents, and it is also caused by the atmosphere of the entire society and the times, and the third part is cultivated by teachers when we were young. When I was in college, I tried to cultivate personality through nurturing methods. It seemed to be a lot of effort but had little effect, and even had the opposite effect. It's too early to say because most college students have no experience in society and don't know how to properly handle various complex stakes. Since they don't know the pros and cons, then simple education is probably like a passing autumn wind and has no meaning to them. Question: Refutation of the definition of knowledge accumulation: Knowledge accumulation refers to a combination of current thinking and text. No matter what the major, it is not feasible without society and human beings. This goes against the original intention of the university. Ours is Firmly opposed.