A certain community in Hangzhou bans cats and dogs. Those who already have them need to deal with them by themselves. Is the management of the property management too lenient?

Now that we live in cities, especially in urban communities, we pay more attention to environmental sanitation. However, there are many conflicts between dog raising and environmental protection. This has been shown in many areas. , Keeping pets is a good thing in itself, because it shows that people are caring, but keeping pets cannot disturb the lives of other neighbors or pollute your own community. This is basic public morality, so as long as you do a good job in raising pets Basic morality, then there will be no contradiction.

Recently I saw in the news that the property management company of a community issued a rather domineering announcement, telling dog owners that they must deal with their own dogs, otherwise they will be responsible for the consequences if they do not deal with them within fifteen days. This overbearing announcement suddenly ignited discussions among community owners. Some people think that the property management approach is good, while others think this announcement is excessive. So now everyone has different opinions, but I have my own opinion on this.

First of all, we need to analyze the cause of the matter. The property management’s overbearing announcement reflects a relatively powerful feeling. Because the property itself serves the residential community, the property itself has no rights to forcefully issue the so-called ban. Because the property is a service unit and should serve the owners of the community, it is not qualified to issue such announcements. This is obvious. It is a very wrong behavior to not take community owners seriously.

Secondly, some of the problems mentioned by the community property management staff are basically problems encountered by their staff when cleaning. They have nothing to do with the actual residents. I think those who work in the service industry only have Real estate companies are the most overbearing, because they seem to be superior and have a basic contempt for the rights of owners. Let's leave aside the matter of pets, but this kind of service attitude is unqualified for real estate companies.

As for the pet matter itself, the property management company should actively carry out publicity work, negotiate with the residents in the community, and only then can a decision be made after it is recognized by the majority of people in the community. At the same time, this decision It has no legal effect, but only serves as a reminder to residents, creating pressure from public opinion and effectively reducing the pollution caused by pets to the community. Therefore, what the property management company did this time is not in compliance with the law, and it is also an illegal act against the residents. They should apologize to the residents as soon as possible.