An Internet company in Beijing was exposed to have set up a tent next to its workstation. How did the company respond?

As for Beijing Internet Education Company? Who Learns From? Company, it was revealed by netizens on July 19 this year that it had set up a tent next to the work station and wrote various short sentences within the company to encourage overtime work. , and it was written on the whiteboard: "Don't be afraid of working overtime and don't want to get off work." As this matter was exposed, many netizens complained that the company had changed from "996" to "007". Regarding this kind of behavior that hopes to keep employees in the company to work overtime, the company's response to the public is that it is voluntary. Regarding the tents next to the workstations, the company's answer is that it is for employees to use for lunch breaks. This answer is really disappointing. Hard to believe. On the 20th, GSX Public Relations responded: "Don't be afraid to work overtime, don't want to get off work?" The slogan was a joke by employees, not an official encouragement, but a small humor of a certain group's own culture. Regarding this kind of answer, I believe that the public is skeptical. Some people also have a deep understanding of the public relations response. The so-called public relations are also paid to do things, which is just a way to calm the situation. For such a response , I believe that more people think that this is because they put pressure on employees and dare not let them tell the true story of the matter. As for this ironic slogan, they may have written it themselves as employees, but who can guarantee that there is no bitterness hidden in it. In response to his company's response, it only made the minimum comment on the tents that were already internal property of the company, saying that they were installed for employees' lunch breaks, while other behaviors were said to be spontaneous behaviors of employees. This kind of The obviously careless public relations statement directly pushed the matter out of the question. For an ordinary person, I really can’t imagine how much of this statement is worthy of belief, but this incident actually exposed the company’s There are more situations. The company's top management is eager to squeeze out all the residual value of an employee without considering the employee's physical health. For such a company, I believe it cannot recruit employees who truly care about the company, and it will be difficult for it to develop for a long time in today's society.