What impact will it have on the centralized publicity of the "top student in the college entrance examination"?

Recently, the Ministry of Education issued a ban: it is strictly forbidden to publicize "the number one in the college entrance examination" and "the enrollment rate in the college entrance examination". For a while, the controversy broke out again. Some netizens joked that "I won't let the champion who took the exam with my ability publicize?" Others questioned "why can't we promote it?" Such a positive example does not allow publicity. Do you let your children watch KUN every day? " There are also voices of understanding and support: "Let education return to normal, so that the number one in the college entrance examination and the enrollment rate will no longer be tools for some people to make profits."

The debate and hot discussion about whether to ban the promotion of "the top student in the college entrance examination" shows to some extent that the phenomenon of publicity and speculation still exists in a certain range, and even its seriousness and flooding need the thunderous measures of the Ministry of Education to "seriously deal with" it.

Top scholars who "perform" in public

Indeed, the "Top Scholar craze" will be repeated every year after the college entrance examination and before entering school. Once the champion of the college entrance examination was just wandering around in red flowers, but now all kinds of ways to rub the hot spots of the champion are simply ridiculous.

For a period of time, the top candidates in the national college entrance examination are like local starlets, but their appearance fees are much cheaper than those of real movie stars. Maybe a few thousand dollars of "scholarships" can get it, so all businesses and even tourist attractions, especially those related to learning and cultural products, are trying their best to rub their hands on hot spots.

The red carpet activity for the top student in the college entrance examination in a province, which had made a big splash before, was sponsored by the local Confucian Temple and a painting and calligraphy institute.

With the rise of the Internet economy, there is a phenomenon that the top student in the college entrance examination becomes online celebrity. According to reports, in 217, many champions appeared on the live broadcast platform. Although many "champions" touch the net with the original intention of exchanging learning experience and contacting the real society, the live broadcast platform takes it as a business and consumes "champions" for a time.

To me, being the number one scholar is a shackle to some extent. For schools, localities and even the whole education, excessive publicity and utilization is just like drinking poison to quench thirst.

As far as middle schools around the country are concerned, "publicizing the number one in the college entrance examination and announcing the enrollment rate" is most directly reflected in the enrollment level, and "good enrollment" means "high quality of educational resources", which will lead to a strange situation of striving for educational resources, which is basically the logic of "sky-high school district housing". On the issue of "striving for difficulties", there will naturally be "corruption blending", that is, people often say "spend money to find someone to enter."

In a sense, some schools, places or educational institutions' infatuation and publicity for the top candidates in the college entrance examination is like "smoking opium". Such "propaganda opium" may bring benefits and comfort to propagandists for a while, but it will eventually harm others and yourself.

indeed, in a short period of time, the publicity of "No.1 in the College Entrance Examination" can immediately enhance the popularity of our school, local government and our institution. In society, the public does recognize the gold-lettered signboard of "No.1 in the College Entrance Examination", and the short-term benefits brought by such publicity are undoubtedly very rich.

however, once we take a long-term view, we will find that such propaganda will do harm for a long time. On the one hand, the pursuit of "the top student in the college entrance examination" will further concentrate educational resources such as teachers, excellent students and funds to schools, places and institutions with advantages, further aggravating the imbalance of educational resources, which is very unfavorable to the long-term development of education and social equity in the field of education.

On the other hand, the centralized publicity of "the top scholar in the college entrance examination" will also promote the universal "top scholar's comparison", thus making more schools, localities and educational institutions fall into the anxiety of "pinching the top". The result of this anxiety will naturally distort the essence of moral education and strengthen the "score-only theory".

Even from the perspective of students and parents, in such a propaganda atmosphere, they become less and less safe in education, and what can only be matched with them is "various successful studies" and "disorderly advanced logic".