Central media: "Hard isolation" cannot be illegal or "hard". How to prevent the epidemic from being reasonable and legal?

Central media:? Hard isolation? Can't break the law? Work hard? Epidemic prevention and control can definitely be isolated, but isolation measures can never be based on absolute restrictions on citizens' personal freedom. If the door is locked, it will not only infringe on citizens' freedom, but also threaten citizens' life and health. This is the real reason for the criticism of China Central Radio Review.

In Qian 'an City, Hebei Province, there is a magical realistic treatment-isolation. Local residents' committees require residents to hand over their keys when they are isolated, or lock their homes with wire. This treatment, which is almost aimed at residents, has aroused widespread concern on the Internet, and the central media has also criticized it. According to the information currently available, Qian 'an City has verified and rectified this matter. Sometimes we are used to calling some epidemic prevention and control measures hard-core measures, but sometimes hard-core does not mean hard work.

Central media:? Hard isolation? Can't break the law? Work hard? It not only involves illegal intrusion into the house, but also violates the personal peace of life.

According to the comments of the central media, hard isolation can't be illegal. According to the current isolation treatment in Qian 'an, it can be found that this kind of behavior is not only suspected of illegally invading the house in the criminal law, but also involves the violation of personal peace stipulated in the civil law, not to mention that locking residents in the house will cause absolute restrictions on residents, which is a right explicitly guaranteed in the fundamental law. This kind of chaos in Qian 'an will actually pose a threat to the safety of residents. If there is a fire in the house, the anti-lock at this time will undoubtedly violate the residents' right to life and health. We must resolutely avoid some so-called hard-core epidemic prevention measures that violate the rule of law.

Epidemic prevention and control can't be arbitrary: it can be legal and reasonable.

Epidemic prevention and control can't be run amok. Epidemic prevention and control itself has certain restrictions on citizens' freedom, but such restrictions are also within a reasonable range, for the benefit of the public and individuals. If citizens are directly locked in their own houses, this will not only infringe on a series of legal rights of citizens, but also cause commercial threats to their lives and health because of accidents.