Xi' an freshman girls donated tens of thousands of pounds of vegetables, but the comment area was full of abuse. Why?

The epidemic situation in Xi has basically come to an end, and the epidemic prevention work has achieved remarkable results. This hard-won victory cannot be separated from the concerted efforts of Qi Xin, a frontline epidemic prevention worker and medical staff. There are also enthusiastic people who donate money and materials to fight the epidemic. During the Xi 'an epidemic, enterprises, institutions and individuals all over the country sent donations and materials in succession, which made people feel very warm. However, it is really chilling that some people use internet spray and keyboard man to question, accuse and even insult those donors.

In Xi 'an, a freshman of Shaanxi Institute of Fashion donated 14000 Jin of vegetables to the school, which aroused great concern. However, her behavior has been misinterpreted, questioned, accused and even abused by individuals.

The girl Chen An is an ordinary freshman. Due to the outbreak of Xi epidemic, the price of vegetables has also risen sharply. Teacher Chen is bent on doing something to fight the epidemic and contributing his love. He thinks that what Xi lacks now is not money, but materials. He wants to donate some vegetables to the school. As he was still at school, he had no extra money and limited ability, so he asked his parents for help.

As the saying goes, what kind of parents there are, what kind of children there are. Chen's parents are also kind and enthusiastic people. They think this is a good thing and should lend a helping hand and do their bit. I promised the child's request. In this way, Chen donated 14 thousand Jin of vegetables to the school. His kindness has also been highly praised by school leaders, teachers and students, and it is worth learning from each of us.

Later, after some media knew about this, they also interviewed Chen Dongxue and released an interview video. Netizens have praised such a loving move and have been affirmed by many people. But what I didn't expect was that his kindness was accused, slandered and reviled by a keyboard man, saying that his purpose was not pure, but he just smiled and did it for the sake of popularity. The comment area was in an uproar. Others said they would donate, why didn't they say it anonymously?

Some people say that the rich second generation is rich. If I have money, I will also donate100000 Jin of vegetables. Some netizens think that this is just like a business tycoon donating money to a famous foreign school, just to let children get preferential treatment at school. In a word, everything is said, which makes people extremely angry. I really want to swear when I see the keyboard man and sprayer behind these so-called mobile phones hurting people.

During each epidemic, there will always be some monsters who question, accuse, even insult and slander others' good deeds. They always feel that others are insincere and hype, all with impure purposes and ulterior motives. Is the internet really a place of extra-legality, allowing these people to defile the kind hearts of others and over-interpret the actions of donors? Your behavior not only hurts the hearts of donors, but also scares the epidemic prevention personnel who are protesting at the front line. Judge others from the moral high ground and ask yourself, is it appropriate for you to do so?

When you tell others what to do, have you ever thought about what you did to protest? What right do those who have not made any contribution to the protest have to blame others?

Say I have money, and I also donate100000 Jin of vegetables. We often say that rich people give money and make great contributions. You have no money to contribute. I'm afraid you don't even have the courage to contribute. You just hide in a dark corner and attack others. Is it really that important to distinguish between anonymity and real name? Besides, anonymity or real name is the right of others, and no one has the right to accuse others. Besides, the point is not here, but others really solved the difficulties for everyone and contributed their own strength to the epidemic. This is a fact, no doubt about it.

A kind act of love was maliciously misinterpreted by those people, and even rose to the level of donors, in order to give special treatment to the school and donate materials. Doesn't your conscience hurt when you say that? It is really chilling that a female college student is kind and pure, but she attracts such a malicious attack. Although Mr. Chen is not a famous university, his high quality and good moral character have sublimated him.

Whether it is a famous university or not, and whether there is higher education or not. It is important that young college students with conscience, love, courage to contribute and excellent moral character are the talents needed by today's society. We don't ask everyone to contribute to the fight against the epidemic, but only hope that individuals can accumulate virtue in their mouths. Looking at things with correct values, without any rhythm, doing your own thing well and keeping your mouth shut is the best affirmation to others.