Who has photos of China people and dogs that are not allowed in?

In April (1June, 868), after Gongjia Park (Bund Park, now Huangpu Park) was completed, the Ministry of Industry and Commerce of the British Concession stationed patrol guards at the gate of the park, and China people were not allowed to visit it, which caused 60 years of protests from the people of China.

On May 21st, the 4th year of Guangxu (June 2 1878+0), Shenbao published an article "Please ban Chi Yuan", saying: "There are parks in Hong Kong, which are beautifully decorated. For example, people in China are not allowed to go out. It's extremely unfair to change the governor, so it's ordered that Chinese and western people visit the park. " "Shanghai and Hong Kong, Apollo is forbidden here. What do you mean by suppressing independence? " "When the garden was built, it was donated by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. China people are now forbidden to visit, and I hope the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology will think twice. "

On the eighth day of March in the seventh year of Guangxu (188 1 April 6, 2008), doctors Yan Yongjing and Tang Maozhi of Shanghai Hongkou Hospital (Tongren Hospital) jointly wrote to the general office of the industrial and commercial office, expressing strong indignation at the fact that the "park" (Huangpu Park) was not allowed to enter, and demanding that the concession authorities correct this mistake. On April 20th, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology replied that "due to the limited area of the park", "all noble and well-dressed China people are allowed to enter the park". However, on April 25, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology replied: "The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has no intention of recognizing the right of China people to enjoy the park." Overturned the promise of April 20.

On April 28 of the same year, the article in Shen Bao criticized: "The country is called a park, which is not privately owned by westerners. It is managed by the Ministry of Industry, and all the articles are donated by Chinese and foreign people. In addition, the Chinese in the concession are the largest, and the donations they raise are also quite small among the Chinese. Therefore, the country should also visit China people, and it is not allowed to stop them. It does not violate the word "public". "

In the 11th year of Guangxu, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced the rules of the park and put up a sign at the gate of the park: "Bicycles and dogs are forbidden to enter, and the self-interest of one's own race cannot be considered to safeguard international reputation and courtesy. On the contrary, our neighbors in Japan and North Korea are given preferential treatment and have the right to enter such public places of entertainment. ..... We are all opposed to all incidents that deprive us of our rights. " Make a request for opening the park. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology replied to 65438 on February 2: "We are not prepared to grant this right because we have not obtained the unanimous consent of foreign communities." Still refused. At that time, not only the park was "Chinese are not allowed to enter", but even the toilets outside were hung with "Chinese are not allowed to enter" signs.

Garden rules of Bund Park

One morning in the 12th year of Guangxu (1July, 886), six priests, including Song Yaoru (Soong Ching Ling's father), Yan Yongjing, Ni Yanxian (Song Yaoru's father-in-law) and Wu Hongyu, came to the Bund Park with Bibles in their hands to protest peacefully. Song Yaoru held a placard in his hand, which read ". After being beaten by an Indian policeman, the crowd gathered around, and a British official let six priests into the garden. The problem remains unresolved.

The 10th day of February in the 15th year of Guangxu (1889? March?

1 1 day), which was also mentioned by designer Ren Taotai in his letter to the British Consul General; "In fact, because it is located in our land in China, the source of construction funds is mainly raised by us in China, but we can't take part in the tour in China. We believe that making such unfair arrangements is nothing more than insulting everyone in China and trying to belittle the prestige of our country. " Please ask the Ministry of Industry to convene a board meeting and decide to open the park. However, the reply from the Director-General of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is still a refusal.

In the same year, several China businessmen came to Shanghai Road and asked them to negotiate with outsiders about opening the park. The submission reads: "It is the land of China, and most of the funds come from the people of China, but the people of China are not allowed to enter the park. This is really an injustice, an insult to me personally, especially an insult to national dignity! " The Ministry of Industry made a slight concession and announced the issuance of "China Park Pass", allowing a small number of high-level officials from China to enter. However, the issuance procedures are very complicated, and each pass is only valid for one week, so few people have visas, and only 183 was issued throughout the year.

At the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China, China intellectuals reacted strongly to this. On May 26th, the 29th year of Guangxu (1July 20th, 903), Zhou Zuoren (brother of Lu Xun) also recorded in his diary: "In the morning, I took a bus and passed through the park on the way ... all the white people were complacent, but China people were not allowed to enter. There is a gold-lettered signboard hanging on the door, and the words "Dogs and China people are not allowed to enter" are written in the book to mourn the Chinese and me. In the thirty-third year of Guangxu (1907), Li Weiqing wrote a passage about public gardens in Shanghai Local Records, in which he said: People in the west of Huangpu River have public gardens with lush grass and beautiful flowers. People from all over the world can enjoy it to their heart's content ... It is his contempt for China to shut out China, who is a slave to dogs and horses. It is shameful to pretend to be the master! In the 6th year of the Republic of China (19 17), Yao Gonghe wrote in "Shanghai Gossip" that in the concession, China people were not allowed to enter public buildings, and that was nothing more. Today's racetrack and the public garden under the White Bridge are the most famous. ..... Today, English is more important than "wooden sign", and it is also a fact that "dogs and China people are not allowed in".

12 On the evening of August 23rd, Guo Moruo wrote the article Eclipse. "There is no way to go to Huangpu Park. Dress up as an Oriental! Poor conquered people are not enough. Indians can come and go freely. Only we in China are dogs! .......... "And wrote ... You can wear kimono or Indian clothes, but only Chinese clothes can't. Dogs and China people are forbidden in several parks in Shanghai. In fact, dogs can go in, but people can't People can go in if they want to be dogs. In the same year 165438+1October16, Cai Hesen published an article entitled "Eighty Years of Foreign Imperialism Ruling Shanghai" in the Guide, in which he wrote that China people were not allowed to live in the concession at first, but the door of foreign parks still hung "China people and dogs are not allowed to enter". 165438 2003125 October, Dr. Sun Yat-sen delivered a speech entitled "The Causes of Civil Disturbance in China": "We China people still can't get into Huangpu Beach and Sichuan Road. We used to put up a sign at the gates of those parks, which said: Dogs and China people are not allowed in. "

At that time, even westerners reflected. In an article entitled "A Meeting in Beijing" (published in the June issue of Atlantic Monthly 1930+065438+ 10), the chairman of the Julius Board Trusteeship Foundation in the United States said: "An incident of rough treatment of the people of a civilized country, that is, the people of China, … is the most serious.

And then what? China? Isn't it? He also wrote to the Christian Monitor, proving that many people, including some missionaries, witnessed this notice.

In the Republic of China 14, during the May 30th anti-imperialist demonstration, when the students passed the Bund Park, they were extremely angry when they saw the ban of "Chinese and dogs are not allowed in" hanging at the gate. Some students borrowed a hammer from the cobbler's booth on the spot, smashed the sign, tried to stop it, and were reprimanded by the masses: "Your country has become a British colony. Instead of fighting, you helped Britain. " Seal arrest means "we can't help it" and we dodged. After being arrested, Chen, then the clerk and liaison officer of the Shanghai Federation of Students during the May 30th Movement, accused Britain of being a self-proclaimed civilized country in court and put up a ban on "Chinese and dogs are not allowed in" in front of the Bund Park. People and dogs are equal. To what extent does it insult China people? If China also put up a sign saying "No dogs allowed in Britain", would the British protest? After the May 30th Movement, a nationwide revolutionary climax was set off, and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology decided to accept China people into the board of directors.

In 16, the imperialists were frightened by the successive victories of the Northern Expeditionary Army and the upsurge of recovering the Wuhan Concession, so they had to pass the proposal of opening the park at the Western Conference in 16, and put it off until June 17, when the people of China could buy tickets, and the struggle ended in victory.

Appendix? Some information about "China people and dogs are not allowed to enter"

(1) Chen Daisun, a professor at Peking University Economic Research Institute, said in a reply to the Garden Management Office of Huangpu District in July 1990: "For our experience of seeing' Chinese and dogs are not allowed in Shanghai Bund Park in June' 1 918, please refer to" China Contemporary Social Scientist "published by Beijing Literature Publishing House in May. I wrote a memoir of "Accidental Memories of the Past" (which has been included in the second volume of "Collected Works of Chen Daisun" published by Peking University Publishing House 1989, p. 468), so I won't repeat it here. It can be explained that this brand (1) is not one of the rules of the garden.

(2) On February 2nd, Jiefang Daily 1989 65438+ published a dialogue between Professor Su and Fudan University students: "I went to Japan to study in 19 19, and it has been 70 years since then. When I passed Shanghai for the first time, there was a sign hanging in front of the Bund Park. I saw what i saw. On the morning of March 6th, Professor Su asked his secretary to answer the phone of the editorial department of Shanghai Garden, saying ... I remember 19 19 when I went to Japan from Wenzhou via Shanghai, I bought a boat ticket on the Bund and saw this sign at the entrance of Huangpu Park. "

(3) In July, 1990, Zhang Zan, an old doctor of traditional Chinese medicine in China (edited by "Medical Spring and Autumn Annals" before liberation) 1990 said: "Chinese and dogs are not allowed in China", which I saw when I was 18 ~ 19 years old. I am 88 years old, ... +0965438.

(d) The development of China? Deve 1obment？ Yes?

China, published in1930s, wrote on page 236: "... the parks opened by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology both inside and outside the concession, except the Chinese Garden, which only costs more than 100 a year, are closed to China people. There is even a sign in front of the park that says "Chinese and dogs are not allowed in" (Chinese?

And then what? Dogs? Isn't it? Acknowledge) card display ".

(5) Zhou (former director of the First National Congress Memorial Hall, retired cadre), Yu (retired cadre of Huangpu District Housing Management Bureau, party member of the Chinese Revolutionary Committee) and other old people all said that they saw the sign "Chinese and dogs are not allowed in".