Real estate false advertising case?

With the continuous high temperature of the domestic real estate market, various real estate advertisements appear rapidly, and most buyers obtain information about real estate through real estate advertisements. However, the proliferation of false advertisements has further aggravated the instability and even chaos of the real estate market while infringing on the interests of the majority of buyers. The following is a classic case of real estate false advertising that I compiled for you, for your reference, welcome to read!

classic case of false advertising in real estate 1

Ms. Cao was preparing to buy a commercial house from a developer in December 212. At that time, the developer advertised that she could enjoy a 9.9% discount if she paid a deposit of 55, yuan during the agreed time: December 1-December 29, 212. After Ms. Cao paid a deposit of 55, yuan, the developer said that if it is a provident fund, it can't enjoy a 9.9% discount, so the two sides are deadlocked.

Ms. Cao thinks that the developer didn't inform the provident fund before that she can't enjoy the preferential treatment, so she asks to return the house and return the deposit of 55, yuan. The developer thinks that the deposit that has been delivered cannot be refunded, so the deposit is not refunded.

Later, Ms. Cao went to No.12315, Jiulongpo District Administration for Industry and Commerce, to lodge a complaint, asking for preferential activities or a refund. Finally, under the mediation of the Industrial and Commercial Branch, the two sides reached an agreement, and the developer promised to refund the consumer a deposit of 55, yuan.

classic case of false advertising in real estate 2

In May 212, the representative of a real estate owner in Banan District complained that the greening rate of his real estate was 41%, and according to the publicity map of the real estate, a community park and a sports ground were planned in the community * * * next to buildings 3 and 32, but no greening was seen when the house was handed over, and the greening could not reach 41% at all.

later, the relevant departments indicated that the planning and design of the property was based on the relevant construction laws, regulations and standards to design and build the greening indicators and supporting facilities. The plot on the east side of Buildings 3 and 32 in the residential area is a planned green space. Because the high-voltage iron tower in the plot has not been relocated, the green space and the sports ground in the green space have not been implemented yet.

classic case of false advertising in real estate 3

Siwei Industrial and Commercial Office of Jiang 'an Branch of Wuhan Administration for Industry and Commerce received a report, and the informant reported that the "Three-yang Jincheng on the Bund" at the intersection of Jinghan Avenue and Sanyang Road had put up a huge advertisement "9, down payment for three rooms". From the price point of view, the down payment was 9,, and the full price was up to 4,-5, yuan. Moreover, there were three rooms, and the price-effectiveness ratio was very attractive. So he specially prepared 9, yuan to buy a house. Who knows that this kind of house is actually only 4 square meters, with a one-bedroom and one-living room structure. The so-called "three rooms" is just a reference design scheme of "mini three rooms, functional partition" provided by the developer. After receiving the report, the industrial and commercial department immediately conducted an investigation. After investigation, Wu Ju Jiyan, the client of Wuhan Jinfa Real Estate Co., Ltd., explained in writing to the industrial and commercial department that the product was a small apartment of 4.36 square meters, originally designed as one bedroom and one living room, and provided customers with a renovation plan for the mini three-bedroom apartment for their reference. The starting price of this apartment is 11,149 yuan/m2, equivalent to a total price of 45, yuan.

classic case of false advertising in real estate 4

In July 2, the owner Yao took a fancy to a house in Shengshi Jiayuan with a total price of more than 7, yuan in a downtown area. At that time, there was such a description in the loushu of Shengshi Jiayuan: "It is a luxury to build a central garden of nearly 6, square meters in the downtown area with an inch of land. Shengshi Jiayuan Urban Apartment has such luxury." It can be said that this promotional text was one of the important reasons that prompted Yao to place an order at that time. Before signing the contract, Yao also specially asked the sales girl to verify whether the "6,-square-meter central garden" was true. The sales girl said that there would be no falsehood if there was something in the loushu.

in June p>22, when Yao got the house, he found that the original 6,-square-meter central garden promised by the developer was less than 2, square meters. According to the developer's explanation, the land acquisition of Shengshi Jiayuan is 11, square meters, minus the construction area and road area of more than 5, square meters, and the rest is the garden area. As the area of public green space has shrunk dramatically, Yao and others, the owner of Shengshi Jiayuan, decided to apply to a municipal arbitration commission for arbitration and demand compensation from the developer.

classic case of false advertising in real estate 5

An advertisement for a real estate in Chengdu was complained by the buyers because of the advertisement "only 2 minutes' drive from Tianfu Square". The complainant, Ms. He, said that when the developer advertised seductively in the media, such as "only 2 minutes' drive from Tianfu Square", "China's top ten most growing real estate enterprises strive to build" and "first-class hydrophilic community", it made people dizzy. After advertising that they were developers, they went to the sales office to pay the deposit of a house.

However, after calming down and thinking carefully, Ms. He discovered that "only 2 minutes' drive from Tianfu Square" is an ideal state when the car is driving at a constant speed of 6 kilometers per hour, and it can't stop halfway. If she drives by herself, she may not actually get there for half an hour. "Top Ten Most Growing Real Estate Enterprises in China" don't know where it came from. In short, it was not selected with the approval of the competent department of * * *; "First-class hydrophilic community" is also a non-standard statement. "You say first-class is first-class, and we don't know what first-class is." Ms. He questioned.

after Ms. he complained to the industrial and commercial department, the developer was ordered by the industrial and commercial department to stop releasing the above advertisements.

classic case of false advertising in real estate 6

two real estate companies in Wenzhou released advertisements that exaggerated or even misinterpreted the actual effect of real estate in Wenzhou newspapers, televisions and other media from September 28 to April 29 and from March to June 29. These advertisements include "Fiona Fang is 13 square kilometers, which is about twice the area of West Lake, and it is the largest urban green lung in the southeast coast", "178 square meters of short-plate structure with a depth of 9 meters, and the scarcity pattern with five faces south", "13 square kilometers of national Sanyang Wetland Park" and "a Ding-level living club with an investment of nearly 1 million square meters".

The person in charge of Wenzhou ouhai district Administration for Industry and Commerce said that this kind of advertisement violated the relevant provisions of Article 37 of the Advertising Law of the People's Republic of China, and was ordered to stop its release, and was publicly corrected to eliminate the influence within the corresponding scope with the same advertising expenses, and was fined 1.12 million yuan and 88, yuan respectively according to law.

classic case of false advertising in real estate 7 On April 21, law enforcement officers of Meiyuan Industrial and Commercial Office of Jinjiang Industrial and Commercial Bureau were in the process of handling the case. Advertisements such as "Jinjiang's first real estate model house, community 1 square meters health runway, Jinjiang's first sunken plaza and clubhouse, and ThyssenKrupp elevator, the world's first brand" were found on the postcard-style printed advertisements released by a real estate company in Jinjiang and the eight printed advertisements released by the company in Xucuo Community, Meiling Street, Jinjiang City. The parties were unable to provide relevant certification procedures on the spot.