Food safety essay (don't copy it) (25 points is good) "It must be before noon on June 3rd, 165438".

Pay attention to food safety and care for life and health.

-Discuss food safety supervision.

Background playback of news events

After the Sanlu incident in 2008, some taunts about food safety appeared on the Internet:

1, China people have completed the chemical literacy in food:

We know that paraffin comes from rice.

We know the difference between dichlorvos and ham.

We know Sudan red from salted duck eggs and Chili sauce.

We know the formalin in the hot pot.

We know sulfur from tremella and candied dates.

Understanding copper sulfate from auricularia auricula

The Sanlu incident let Chinese people know the chemical function of melamine.

2. Foreigners become strong by drinking milk.

People in China drink milk stones.

Japanese slogan: A glass of milk a day revitalizes a nation.

China population figures: A glass of milk a day shocked the whole country.

A bunch of people involved in the Sanlu series of criminal cases were finally severely punished according to law. Tian Wenhua was sentenced to life imprisonment, deprived of political rights for life and fined RMB 246,838+0,438+0,000 for the crime of producing and selling fake and inferior products. The defendant produced and sold "protein powder" (including melamine) and was sentenced to death with a suspended execution for the crime of endangering public safety by dangerous means. The defendants Zhang and Xue Jianzhong were sentenced to life imprisonment for the same crime. Other 15 defendants were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment ranging from two to fifteen years.

Through Sanlu's "tainted milk powder" incident, China was given a vivid food safety education lesson at the cost of tens of thousands of children's lives and health. Afterwards, food safety supervision departments, local governments, dairy industry, etc. They all summarized and reflected, and made various commitments and statements. However, the problem of food safety has not been contained, but has intensified. Only from 20 1 1, food safety problems were exposed again in many places, and the clenbuterol incident in Henan was raging, and clenbuterol was repeatedly banned during 10; Then came the "Poisonous Pepper" incident in Chongqing, the toner stick incident in Zhongshan, Guangdong, the "Poisonous Ginger" incident in Yichang, Hubei, the poisonous bean sprouts incident in Shenyang, Liaoning, the watermelon swelling agent incident in Danyang, Jiangsu, the steamed bread dyeing incident in Shanghai and the gutter oil incident that swept the country recently. ...

(A) the status of food safety in China

Answering "What is your biggest security concern?" Some time ago, the survey results in Sina.com showed that 30.7% of the respondents thought it was food safety, ranking first. The reporter visited and found that there are "four sins" in food safety at present, which worries consumers the most.

One charge: "The medicine killed you". Pesticide residues in vegetables and fruits exceed the standard, and some foods illegally use and abuse additives, endangering consumers' health.

Two sins: "black heart". Every year, a large amount of food flows to the market from "black workshops", "black factories", "black markets" and "black dens", with dirty environment, irregular production and substandard quality.

Three sins: "mask". Some food producers and sellers "confuse the fake with the real" and "shoddy", falsifying food, making it difficult for consumers to distinguish between authenticity and deception.

Four deadly sins: "playing with concepts." All kinds of genetically modified foods, nanotechnology foods and organic foods with high-tech labels are popular, among which there are many products with vague labels and nonstandard products, which often make ordinary consumers spend money unconsciously and spend in a muddle.

When talking about how to eradicate the "four sins", the interviewed consumers have "three hopes": one hopes to put an end to "soft supervision". Second, I hope that the food industry will rebuild its credit system. Third, I hope to improve my awareness of supervision and rights protection. (The above information comes from Modern Express on September 9, 20 1 1)

To sum up, food safety has the following three characteristics: First, problem foods are becoming more and more widespread. Problem foods have expanded from traditional staple foods such as grain, oil, meat, poultry, eggs, vegetables, bean products and aquatic products to fruits, alcohol, dry goods, dairy products and roasted seeds and nuts, showing a three-dimensional and all-round trend. Second, the harm degree of problem food is getting deeper and deeper, which has moved from the health hazard outside food to the safety hazard inside food. In the past, we only paid attention to the total number of bacteria in food, but now it is the residues of pesticides, fertilizers and chemicals that go deep into food. Third, the methods of making drugs and inferior products are more and more diverse, more and more "in-depth" and more and more hidden, from the outside to the inside of food, from physics to chemistry. Judging from the toxic and harmful foods exposed, it is unimaginable that criminals have innovative and diverse means of making drugs and making fakes, and they have reached the point of "not afraid of not being able to do it, but afraid of being unexpected".

(II) Reasons

According to the latest data from authoritative departments, in 20 10, the relevant departments inspected 35.52 million production and business units of various edible agricultural products, food and related products, investigated and dealt with various violations of laws and regulations130,000, and arrested 248 suspects. More than 60,000 illegal enterprises160 (Source: Xinhua News Agency, 20 160) were banned and stopped. Qiu, Party Secretary and Deputy Procurator-General of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Supreme People's Republic of China, said that since September last year, the Supreme People's Procuratorate has supervised 76 cases of manufacturing and selling fake and shoddy food, which had a great impact. Since the beginning of this year, the national procuratorial organs * * * have put on record 37 cases involving 57 people in duty crimes involving food safety, including 39 people who committed dereliction of duty (taken from 2065438+01May 23rd Legal Evening News). It can be seen that the rectification of food safety is not strong, but the "vitality" of toxic food shows no obvious signs of decline. Why are food safety incidents still frequent?

Poisonous foods emerge one after another, completely ignoring the repeated demands of the central government on local governments, and becoming "invincible cockroaches", which are caused by factors such as lack of system, lax law enforcement, official achievements and many moral factors. After analysis and comparison, the causes of food safety problems in China are mainly as follows:

1, there is no industry entry threshold, and it is difficult to distinguish between producers and operators. In particular, the existence of the original food inspection-free system has made enterprises rampant, leaving many regulatory gaps. In addition, at present, the punishment of illegal enterprises in China's laws is relatively light, which can not achieve the effect of "killing chickens as an example". Now it is "pulling out the chicken feathers and showing the monkey", and the illegal cost of enterprises is too low, which makes many enterprises feel lucky.

2, multi-head supervision, poor implementation. At present, China's food safety supervision system is based on "subsection management, supplemented by variety management", which leads to fragmentation of food safety management and poor communication. Due to the different management systems of these departments, the competent departments of human resources, finance and materials have their own owners. Therefore, "institutional gathering" has increased the difficulty for the government to manage food safety. The supervision of one aspect by multiple departments often needs the coordination of the government, which increases the management cost and reduces the management efficiency. The history of the separation and integration of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Ministry of Health shows that the idea of establishing an independent food safety supervision department seems unclear, which not only affects the effectiveness of food safety supervision, but also causes the disadvantages of unclear responsibilities.

3. The food safety standard system is not perfect. The main manifestations are that it is not in line with international standards, the structural design of food safety standards is not reasonable enough, the in-depth study of standards is not enough, some standards are poorly implemented, and even mandatory standards are not well implemented. For example, the dairy industry standard revised in July was evaluated by experts as "25 years behind, the worst in the world", and China was also called "kidnapped by a few large enterprises, the worst standard in the world".

4. The government needs to use laws and regulations and corresponding policy tools to supervise food safety. At present, the policies and regulations are imperfect, unable to be legalized and institutionalized, and there is no long-term mechanism. In the face of emerging food safety problems, "fire fighting" governance is often adopted. Where there is a problem, deal with it. After the incident, "swords and guns are put in storage, and horses are put south." As a result, counterfeiting and selling fakes have been repeatedly banned, and even all of them have intensified.

5. Insufficient financial investment and unreasonable resource allocation of testing institutions. As a developing country, China's lack of national financial resources is an unavoidable problem. The lack of national financial input has caused the following three problems: First, the capacity of some testing projects urgently needed by the country is insufficient. For example, the identification technology of unknown toxic and harmful substances, prohibited items, hormones, pesticide residues, veterinary drug residues, dioxins, mad cow disease detection, safety evaluation of genetically modified foods, etc. The gap between the ability of supervision and inspection and the international level is gradually increasing, which restricts the improvement of the level of food hygiene supervision and management. Second, the interest drive leads to the deviation of law enforcement behavior of law enforcement departments. For example, some law enforcement departments focus on economic interests, substituting punishment for punishment, and once punished, law enforcement supervision is tight and loose, and illegal acts are repeatedly prohibited, and some even act as umbrellas for illegal operators. Third, the establishment of grass-roots food hygiene supervision institutions and the allocation of technical personnel can not meet the needs of supervision.

6, food producers and operators lack of integrity, moral distortion. Food producers and operators only pay attention to money and lose the moral bottom line. In spite of the prohibition of the law, many of them took risks and tried their best to try their best to break the law. At present, it is difficult for both government departments and consumers to grasp the credit status of food hygiene quality of enterprises, to eliminate information asymmetry, to encourage trustworthy people, to crack down on and curb untrustworthy people, to trace their responsibilities, and to form an honest business atmosphere.

Bai's remarks in Weibo are worth pondering: We are both plaintiffs and defendants now. People who sell pork happily use the money earned by mixing pork with lean meat to buy steamed bread, but they didn't expect steamed bread to be dyed black by others. Then people who sell dyed steamed buns come out to buy milk powder for their children, which contains melamine. Everyone is hurting others and everyone is a victim. This is a vicious circle.

Third, the necessity and deficiency of government supervision

In order to punish unscrupulous and illegal food producers, the State Council has set up a food safety committee. Its responsibilities include: analyzing the food safety situation, formulating planning and guiding principles, proposing regulatory policies and leading their implementation. But supervision should be practical and long-term, not slogans and promises. After the appearance of dyed steamed bread in Shanghai, Wang Longxing, director of the Shanghai Food Safety Office, apologized to the public for "dyeing" steamed bread and said that he would "resolutely not protect his shortcomings" during the investigation. After the apology, the public is more eager to see not only verbal statements, determination and even guarantees and promises, but also whether food similar to dyed steamed bread can no longer appear on the table of ordinary people in the future, and how to eat safe food, safe meat, safe steamed bread and safe food in their later lives. This is what the people have been paying attention to. In this regard, the people most hope that the government will do it in a down-to-earth manner. Since dyed steamed buns have long been sold in supermarkets, where was the government's previous supervision? Don't be forced to make promises and apologies when something goes wrong, and carry out so-called crisis public relations, because promises and apologies will not change the defective food safety system. This is probably what the people are most worried about. What the people want most is normalized daily supervision and source governance, not piecemeal governance. Otherwise, other incidents similar to the "steamed bread incident" will inevitably occur in the future, and the relevant departments will have to come out to apologize, guarantee, express their views and investigate.

(A) the necessity of government supervision

1, information asymmetry leads to market failure.

Because of information asymmetry, manufacturers with more information may have opportunistic behaviors, which will harm consumers' interests, reduce the whole social welfare and make the market inefficient. First of all, the quality of food can only be judged after eating. In the process of food production and processing, the application of a large number of modern technologies makes it increasingly unrealistic for consumers to make a reasonable judgment on the quality and safety level of food only by feeling or experience. Secondly, a lot of information about food quality, safety and quality, such as whether there are hormones in food, whether there are antibiotics, whether the residues of agricultural and veterinary drugs exceed the standard, and so on. Are beyond the understanding of consumers. This shows that there is a serious asymmetry in the food market, consumers are always at a disadvantage, and it is difficult to make an accurate judgment on the safety of the selected food, which leads to the failure of the market mechanism, the phenomenon that inferior food drives out high-quality food, and finally leads to the disorder of the food market. Therefore, in order to maintain food safety and ensure life and health, appropriate government supervision is very necessary.

2. The need of public interest

Problem food first harms people's health, which is related to people's vital interests, the quality of life of the whole people, and even the long-term planning of people's physique. The second is the impact on the healthy development of the food industry. The development of food industry depends on the demand of consumers, and the demand of consumers depends on the confidence of consumers brought by quality and safety. Previous food safety incidents, even some false rumors about food safety, have brought serious consequences such as reduced production and laid-off, and some even have a great impact on the whole industry, which is difficult to recover. The third is the impact on the government's credibility and national image. Successive food safety incidents have greatly affected people's consumer confidence, seriously impacted social integrity and moral system, and even affected the credibility of the government. Some food safety incidents also involve overseas countries, which have a negative impact on the national image and foreign trade exports.

3. The need to resist malicious competition

At present, the competition in China food industry is fierce. At the same time, although our people's requirements for quality of life are gradually improving, they are generally very sensitive to prices. Therefore, on the one hand, food industry must improve the added value of products through deep processing, on the other hand, it has to keep the cost of products low to gain competitive advantage. When consumers buy food, although they will shop around, they often compare the price rather than the quality. As for the safety of food, simply speaking, it is judged by the shelf life on food packaging. This makes some unscrupulous manufacturers use inferior raw materials in the food production process, which reduces the processing quality and attracts consumers at low prices, thus leading to market dislocation of survival of the fittest.

(B) the lack of government supervision

If traced back to the source, who should bear greater responsibility, such as producers, sellers and regulators? There seems to be no clear answer. However, we can understand that every time a major food safety incident breaks out, almost only the producers are responsible for apologizing, rectifying and being punished; The administrative departments of quality inspection, industry and commerce are actually only responsible for surprise action, apology and identification. There may be a serious problem that power cannot be effectively "supervised". In a series of major food safety incidents that shocked China and foreign countries in the past, except for a few responsible persons in the production and circulation fields, the responsible persons in the supervision field were rarely punished. In the wave after wave of major food incidents, the spirit of "overnight surprise inspection" by the unpunished regulatory authorities, the determination and summary shown, can easily be regarded as just a political show of power. Behind the show is the arrogance and insincerity of power.

1, yamen style, supervision department above. Some regulatory authorities have developed the habit of "letting producers take samples for inspection" and "looking at samples in the office".

2. Local protection. Grass-roots supervisors sometimes meet their superiors and ask for "care" for individual food enterprises, which are either local taxpayers or projects that a leader attracts investment, so they can't move easily.

3. Centralized surprise sampling and inventory can only be temporary, and the symptoms will not be cured. Every major festival, we often see in the news that relevant government departments go deep into farmers' markets and supermarkets for inspection, but it is difficult to find any traces at ordinary times, and even consumers can't complain. A gust of wind supervision in the form of political movement is difficult to achieve practical results. You know, we don't just need safe food during holidays. Therefore, only by establishing a long-term and normal working mechanism can we really tighten the food safety net and rebuild consumer confidence.

It is not difficult to punish food safety violations. The Food Safety Law, which came into effect in June 2009, stipulates that the fine can reach 10 times of the original price of the problem food, and serious problems may lead to the revocation of the business license. The law promulgated last September listed the death penalty as a punishment, but even so, it failed to deter black-hearted manufacturers. From the formulation and implementation of the Food Safety Law to the establishment of the Food Safety Committee of the State Council, from the rectification of the dairy industry to various special rectification and sampling inspection, the supervision is not too strong, and there are not many food safety legislation. However, the repeated exposure of safety incidents has frustrated consumers' confidence, indicating that reflection and rectification are still weak, and it is more necessary to conduct a "comprehensive scan" and "comprehensive upgrade" of all links and systems in the food industry.

Fourth, learn from foreign experience: full-process monitoring plus huge compensation.

Food safety is related to everyone's life and health, and it is also a global problem. In many countries in the world, food safety accidents often occur. For example, in Germany at the end of 20 10, carcinogenic dioxins were found in eggs, pork and chicken. By the end of 20110, the epidemic of "poisonous cantaloupe" in the United States had spread to 19 states, resulting in 17 deaths and 84 infections. Comparatively speaking, these countries and regions have established a relatively perfect food safety guarantee system from farm head to table, but food safety accidents still occur from time to time, and it is a long way to go to eradicate food safety problems. Let's see what tricks are worth learning.

The first measure: strictly control the source-the regulatory tentacles extend to the place of origin.

Strict monitoring measures should be implemented from the source of food supply. Livestock used for food, such as cattle, sheep and pigs, will be marked with identification labels, which will be tracked and monitored by the network computer system. Slaughterhouse should also keep detailed information of these animals and mark the source of slaughtered animals. Meat products should be marked with "identity cards" to indicate their origin and destination.

The second measure: pay attention to the circulation link-"file" each food.

Information such as producers of agricultural products such as rice flour, fruits and vegetables, meat products and dairy products, location of farmland, pesticides and fertilizers used, times of use, harvest and sales dates should be recorded. Relevant departments collect this information, organize it into a database and open a web page, and assign an "ID card" number to each agricultural product for consumers to inquire. After agricultural products have "ID cards", the traceability management mode becomes easy to operate.

In Germany, the principles of food chain and traceability have been well implemented. For example, when consumers see eggs in the supermarket, there is a red number on each egg. For example: 2-DE-0356352, the first digit is used to indicate the feeding mode of laying hens, and "2" indicates the production of captive hens; DE indicates that the country of production is Germany; The number in the third part represents the number of the chicken farm, chicken container or chicken cage where the laying hens are located. Consumers can choose according to the information conveyed by the red number.

If there is a food safety crisis, you can also quickly find the reason according to the code. 20 10, 10 at the end of February, the German safety food management agency found the excessive carcinogen dioxin in some eggs, which aroused great concern in Germany. By tracking down the poisoned eggs, the relevant institutions quickly set their sights on a feed raw material supplier in Schleswig-Holstein. The company provided fatty acids contaminated by industrial raw materials to feed production enterprises, which led to dioxin exceeding the standard in its downstream industrial products. Subsequently, the German government quickly isolated 4,700 affected pig farms and poultry farms, and forcibly slaughtered more than 8,000 chickens.

The third measure: food fraud should be severely punished.

In developed countries with relatively developed food safety systems, food safety accidents also occur from time to time, and all countries have increased their penalties, many of which are worth learning from.

Germany: criminal proceedings plus huge compensation

At the end of 20 10, the chicken farm in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, was found to be polluted by the carcinogen dioxin for the first time. On June 6th, 65438, German police investigated feed producers "Harless and Yanqi" in Shihe. On the 7th, the German Ministry of Agriculture announced the temporary closure of more than 4,700 farms and banned the sale of meat and egg products produced by contaminated farms.

German prosecutors filed criminal proceedings against the perpetrators of this dioxin incident, while the damaged farm plans to file civil compensation, which may be as high as 40 million to 60 million euros per week, which may make the perpetrators completely bankrupt.

South Korea: banned the sale of toxic food for 10 years, and imposed a high fine.

France: sell expired food and close it immediately.

The fourth measure: food recall to build the final barrier

The recall system of problem food is a remedial measure after the defect of food quality is found, and it is the last barrier to prevent the problem food from flowing to the table.

For the recall of unqualified food, the German Food Safety Agency and the Federal Consumers Association jointly set up the "Food Recall Committee" to be responsible for the recall of problematic food. In 2004, under the supervision of "Food Recall Committee", Huntegel Company found that the pregnant and lying-in women's milk powder and baby's bean powder produced by the company contained "Enterobacter Ban Qi", which threatened consumers' health, especially babies' health. After the incident, Huntegel recalled the product as quickly as possible, and paid 6.5438+million euros in compensation to consumers.

The fifth measure: improve the food safety law and protect it by law.

The United States accelerated the process of food safety legislation in 2009. Following the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Law in 2009, several revised Food Safety Enhancement Laws were passed in 2009. No system is omnipotent, and the relatively advanced food safety management system in the United States still needs to be continuously improved. On June+10 this year, US President Barack Obama signed the Food Safety Modernization Act, which ushered in a major change in the US food safety supervision system. This reform of the Obama administration is an adjustment of the American food safety system according to the changing reality. 100 years, the food safety system in the United States has been continuously improved and matured.

The food supervision system in Britain and Germany has also accumulated and developed for decades or even hundreds of years. The Food Standards Agency (FSA), the UK food safety regulator, was established in 2000. Previously, Britain promulgated the Food Safety Law in 1990, which made detailed provisions on food quality and standards. The Food Safety Law was revised on the basis of 1984 Food Law. Looking back, we can also find some laws related to food safety. The history of German food law can be traced back to 1879. Up to now, there are more than 200 laws and regulations on food safety in Germany, covering all aspects of raw material procurement, production and processing, transportation, storage and sales. It can be seen that developed countries have attached great importance to food safety for a long time, and the relevant laws and regulations are constantly revised and improved with the times.

Five, some ideas and suggestions on rectifying China's food safety problems.

It is necessary to establish the ruling philosophy of "all for people, for people's health" and "prudent obligation" and truly treat consumers as gods. Protect the health of consumers and only allow the provision of safe food; Protect consumers from fraud and guard against fraud; Protect consumers' right to know and provide consumers with real information. Specific ideas and suggestions are as follows:

1. Improve legislation and food safety standards. In accordance with the requirements of the Food Safety Law on food safety supervision, a seamless supervision and management system is established, and a scientific, reasonable and well-defined complete legal responsibility system is formed, which provides a strong institutional guarantee for investigating food safety responsibility and compensating victims of food safety problems. It is necessary to improve the standard system as soon as possible, comprehensively clean up and integrate the existing quality and safety standards, food hygiene standards, food quality standards and industry standards for edible agricultural products, and speed up the resolution of the lack, duplication and contradictions of standards. If it is difficult to introduce national standards for a while, we must first formulate local standards or normative requirements such as product safety, production technology and inspection methods, and encourage enterprises to formulate enterprise standards that are stricter than national and local standards to prevent regulatory gaps.

2. Strengthen administrative management. Through the integration of the regulatory system, it is necessary to avoid regulatory gaps, improve regulatory efficiency, save regulatory resources, and prevent overlapping and mutual restriction of functions, so as to give full play to the effectiveness of the food safety regulatory system. Strengthen the territorial responsibility of local governments, strengthen the leadership of food safety supervision, and overcome the interference of local protection on food safety supervision. We must regard food safety as an important task of local economic and social development, support the regulatory authorities to correctly perform their duties, and create a good law enforcement environment; All regulatory departments are required to perform their duties, cooperate closely, have their responsibilities in place, and connect with each other to form a complete regulatory chain and accountability system. The food industry has a long industrial chain, many links and scattered regulatory power, so it is necessary to form a joint regulatory force to improve regulatory efficiency. The food safety problem we often talk about is' Jiulong Water Control'. Why? This is the embarrassment of hitchhiking in economics. There are many food supervision departments, and every supervision link will think, I don't care here, others will naturally take care of it; On the other hand, if I spend a lot of manpower and material resources to manage, food safety will not go wrong, and other departments will also "hitchhike", so it is imperative to break this overlapping system.

3. Extend and improve the supervision industry chain. Food quality supervision should cover the whole industry chain. The implementation of the "whole industry chain", "from the field to the table" food quality and food raw materials inspection and supervision. It is necessary to clarify the scope of functions and accountability procedures of various regulatory departments in legislation. On this basis, we can consider establishing an inter-departmental food regulatory agency to coordinate the management of food safety in each process, so as to prevent the dilemma of mutual shirking. In particular, it is necessary to clearly define the dereliction of duty of the regulatory authorities. In the event of a major food safety accident, the relevant responsible person will be severely punished. For example, in some western countries, in the event of a major food safety accident, the highest to the Minister of Health, the lowest to the person in charge of the relevant regulatory departments must take the blame and resign.

4. In the complex modern society, the government's ability is limited. Therefore, the government should welcome and advocate social forces to intervene in food problem management and make relevant system design.

Faced with the impact of wave after wave of major food safety issues, it cannot be effectively solved. Many scholars believe that because the food problem involves various interests and actors, a single attack by any party can not be effectively solved, but there must be a comprehensive concept of "social governance", that is, in a modern society with diversified social interests and subjects, the government can only let enterprises, non-governmental organizations, communities and other subjects participate in governance and use legal, market, consultation and administrative means. Only in this way can society be effectively governed. Therefore, the governance of food problems not only needs effective power restriction and legislative follow-up for producers, supervisors and sellers, but also needs to introduce social forces to participate in food safety supervision and supervision. In contrast, the latter is in urgent need of development.

As far as food safety is concerned, we should pay attention to the role and independence of trade associations in formulating industry standards and standardizing industry self-discipline, but at present, the role that trade associations can play is relatively limited. In addition, we should pay special attention to the role of the media in food safety supervision. The media can cooperate with food safety research institutions in colleges and universities to release food safety-related information of authoritative research institutions in time, thus forming regulatory pressure on the regulatory authorities.

5. Increase the illegal cost of food safety.

We must persist in severely punishing chaos, increase illegal costs, and increase the pain of offenders. Producers dare to take risks because the benefits of taking risks far outweigh the illegal costs. It is this economic interest that makes producers give up moral rationality in the face of temptation. Therefore, the food safety law should also increase the cost of producing fake and shoddy food through punitive damages and use economic leverage to promote the transformation of producers from economic people to moral people. Specifically, the amount of compensation and punishment can be increased. The existing 10 compensation is obviously a controversial amount, because for ordinary consumers, the cost of their rights protection may exceed 10 compensation, and the amount of 10 compensation may not hurt the bones and muscles of interested producers.

6, the establishment of enterprise credit system

What is important is that making money is the purpose of enterprise management, but the products produced by enterprises are oriented to the broad masses of the people, and products that harm the health of the people cannot be produced because of selfish desires. Strengthening the internal management of enterprises and shaping honest enterprises can prevent food safety from the source. The construction of honesty is, in the final analysis, the construction of legal system. Honesty is the imperial clause in civil law and the legalization of traditional virtues. In the future, we should regard the integrity construction of enterprises or operators as a basic and routine project, establish a quantitative assessment system and persevere, because this is a crucial event. Only in this way, enterprises and businesses will regard consumers as real gods and food safety will be guaranteed.

7. Reward informants according to the situation of seizure, give full play to the supervision power of the masses, and let illegal rats cross the street and everyone shout and beat them to purify the food market.

8. Strengthen the protection of manpower, equipment and funds of grass-roots supervision departments, decouple fines from departmental interests, and prohibit fines from being returned or disguised as "bystanders". China's Food Safety Law clearly stipulates that local people's governments at or above the county level are responsible for food safety in their respective administrative areas. The vast majority of food safety problems occur at the grassroots level and are also solved at the grassroots level. Whether the local government has established the work responsibility system and the implementation of the fund guarantee should be the focus of the recent inspection and accountability.

label

In order to enhance consumer confidence, the government must take concrete measures. "Zero tolerance" can't stay in words. If punished, he will be punished. The investigation can't go away. The illegal cost is far greater than the illegal income, which can form a "high-voltage line" and bring deterrence. Food safety is related to people's health and life safety, to healthy economic development and social stability, and to the image of the government and the country. Food safety has become an important aspect to measure people's quality of life, social management level and national legal system construction. Food safety is closely related to people's lives and property. Food is the most important thing for the people, and food safety comes first. We believe that as long as the relevant departments strictly supervise, the market actively allocates resources, and enterprises operate in good faith, the food safety problem will eventually be solved. Let's hope that this day will come soon, and we can all eat safe food.