Go to the police station to report the case. The police station said it was an economic dispute and refused to file a case. What should I do?

Public security organs exercise administrative power, law enforcement power and judicial power, which is a symbol of state power and mandatory. The power it exercises is endowed by law, and no one can change it without legal procedures.

Civil rights, fundamentally speaking, are citizens' private rights, and citizens can give up their private rights, but the obligee does not advocate and the obligor's obligations cannot be fulfilled. For example, it is legal for Zhang San to lend Li Si 10000 yuan, and it is also legal for Li Si to ask Zhang San to pay back the money. Civil acts of citizens are "highly autonomous" without violating the basic principles of law, and no one can interfere.

The former is public power and the latter is private power. Legally speaking, the intervention of public power on private rights is likely to cause the infringement of public power on private rights, so there is a famous theory that "citizens' private rights are sacred and inviolable" Therefore, all countries in the world generally prohibit public power from interfering with civil rights. In our legislation, we also pay special attention to the boundary between public power and citizens' private rights.

Economic dispute is actually a kind of civil dispute, and the law will certainly not give the public security administrative law enforcement organs the power and obligation to deal with civil disputes. It is even more impossible to give the public security administrative organs special powers to deal with civil disputes, such as evaluation power, judgment power and enforcement power. In some cases, the police will also evaluate some civil incidents at work, which is actually a personal behavior of the police, not a job behavior.

Due to special reasons, for a time, the public security organs intervened in civil disputes in many directions and became the backbone of resolving civil disputes and maintaining social stability. This phenomenon can only be a "short-lived phenomenon" in the long history of the rule of law, and it cannot last long. Now, from top to bottom, this kind of "non-police activities" has been gradually cleaned up, so that the work of public security organs has gradually embarked on the track of rule of law. Or for historical reasons, it will not happen overnight to completely eliminate such "non-police activities", which is closely related to the process of national legal system construction, the legal thinking of administrative organs at all levels and the legal concepts of the masses. For example, the slogan "If you are in trouble, call the police" is still on people's lips. In fact, it is not always the statutory duty of the public security organs to solve the "difficulties" encountered by the public. For example, if a citizen is too poor to eat, this "difficulty" does not belong to the public security organs.

Dealing with economic disputes is not the statutory duty of public security organs, of course, it will not be accepted, let alone filed. The only way to deal with it is to deal with civil disputes.

The theory of "inviolability of citizens' private rights" also determines that there are many ways to deal with civil events, for example, two or more parties negotiate on their own; Mediation through intermediary; Apply for mediation by opinion polls (all villages, neighborhood committees, large enterprises and associations should establish mass opinion polls) ... If they can't handle it by themselves, they will eventually bring a lawsuit to the people's court.

To sum up, we can also see that the law encourages citizens to handle all kinds of civil disputes, including economic disputes, as far as possible, so as to improve citizens' civil capacity. Only when civil acts reach irreconcilable places can we turn to public power. The compulsory public power to resolve civil disputes is only granted by law to the people's courts, not to the public security organs.