English Debate Competition: Science is more important than humanities, seeking positive arguments (English)

I have to write so much. . . And only give five points. . . Hey. . . Only loss is the best! !

Ok, let me give you a few points.

1. Medicine helps us get rid of diseases, but humanities can't. We use scientific knowledge to make drugs. Science saves lives in this sense, but humanities is not.

Medicine helps us get rid of diseases, but humanities can't. We use scientific knowledge to make drugs. From this perspective, science can't save lives, and humanities can't.

With science, we humans have created great things, such as cars and computers, which greatly facilitate our daily life. Humanities cannot be based on this.

Because of science, human beings have done many great things, such as cars and computers, which have made great contributions to our daily life, which humanities can't do.

3. Science is everywhere. Almost everything you usually see is made on scientific basis: skyscrapers and other high-rise buildings are built according to scientific design to maintain stability. Paint is scientifically designed, so it won't be toxic. Hinges are scientifically made, so they can withstand greater pressure and are more durable ... but we don't see humanities everywhere, do you?

Science is everywhere, and almost everything we see needs scientific production: skyscrapers need scientific design to be stable, paints need scientific preparation to be non-toxic, and even metal connections behind doors need scientific manufacturing to withstand greater pressure and become more durable. . . But we can't see humanity in these things, can we?