Why do you pull the switch in the peak season?

1 refers to the control of energy consumption intensity (also known as energy consumption per unit GDP, creating energy utilization efficiency in economic output value) and total energy consumption.

20 15 The Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee put forward "Double Control of Energy Consumption", aiming at saving energy from the source, reducing pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, forcing the transformation of economic development mode and improving the level of green development. In addition, "dual control of energy consumption" can also better protect national energy security.

In fact, since the 11th Five-Year Plan, China has taken the reduction of energy consumption per unit GDP as a binding indicator. During the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period, China proposed to reasonably control the total energy consumption. In the "Thirteenth Five-Year Plan" outline, this indicator is further refined as the national energy consumption per unit GDP is reduced by 20 15%, and the national total energy consumption is controlled within 5 billion tons of standard coal in 2020.

The core index of "double control of energy consumption" is energy intensity as an efficiency index, which is closely related to regional industrial structure, technical capacity and development stage, and is an important yardstick to measure high-quality development.

During the "Thirteenth Five-Year Plan" period, all localities achieved the goal of "double control of energy consumption" for five years according to the established plan. If this speed is maintained, the goal of "double control" can be successfully achieved. The implementation effect also reflects the rationality and operability of goal setting.

2. The energy intensity constraint system has been implemented for more than 10 years, and the "double control of energy consumption" has been implemented for nearly 6 years, and the "barometer" released every quarter has also been done for 89 years. The target requirements of "double control of energy consumption" have been stable and clear, and there is no temporary overweight.

All localities should have implemented policies according to the established goal of "double control", but since the outbreak of the epidemic, the prices of commodities favored by safe-haven funds have hit record highs, and related enterprises have the impulse to expand production capacity.

At the same time, the domestic epidemic situation will be prevented and controlled in an orderly manner, and production will resume as soon as possible, laying the necessary foundation for undertaking domestic and international production needs. Since then, the energy consumption of domestic industrial provinces has risen rapidly.

At the same time, under the expectation of the peak of carbon dioxide emissions in 2030, some areas take the year before the peak of carbon dioxide emissions as the time window for "climbing the peak", competing for the "two high" projects with high energy consumption and high emissions, giving the green light to the "two high" projects in violation of regulations, and trying to seize the "site" of energy consumption increase early. In some places, unapproved projects are frequent.

In the first half of this year, energy consumption in many places rose instead of falling. The energy intensity and total consumption of nine provinces and autonomous regions were given a first-class warning by the National Development and Reform Commission.

Under the pressure of assessment, all localities quickly set up a "military order" to speed up rectification. But in a blink of an eye, it's almost the fourth quarter. How to achieve the annual goal? As a result, some places have taken strong measures to formulate objectives and tasks, forcing industrial parks and industries to limit production, stop work and cut off electricity.

Uncle Dao saw a screenshot of a chat: a place was interviewed by a superior because it did not complete the goal of "double control". As a result, the local arrangement was made overnight and a unified "hard requirement" was put forward.

The task has long been clear, and the goal is clear. Why do you have to burn your eyebrows to remember to execute it? If you see the red light early, you will slam on the brakes when you rush to the line. Have you considered the passengers' feelings?

Doing nothing at ordinary times, engaging in layers of overweight and life-threatening assaults near the assessment; Usually, the slogan of "green development" is shouted, but in practical work, short-term interests are repeatedly pursued, exposing some misunderstandings about the new development concept in some places, and the planning of green and low-carbon transformation is not active.

3. Sports-style "carbon reduction" was criticized by the Politburo meeting. If we don't correct it, there will be endless trouble.

"One size fits all" requires enterprises to stop production and limit production, and the prices of related products will rise because of the shortage of supply. Moreover, because the limited production enterprises mostly involve upstream raw materials, the price increase will inevitably lead to the narrowing of the profit margin of downstream enterprises, forcing enterprises to transfer production costs to the consumer side, raise consumer prices and raise inflation levels. This is not only not conducive to energy conservation and emission reduction, but also brings unnecessary disorder to the economy and society.

In fact, there are many ways to do a good job of "double control of energy consumption": for example, adjusting the industrial structure, eliminating backward production capacity, and improving resource utilization through technological upgrading; Another example is to optimize the cascade utilization of energy among regions, industries and enterprises, and reduce energy waste with the help of intelligent management systems; You can also carry out energy-saving transformation, green lighting and green refrigeration on existing buildings, and hire professional companies to design green energy-saving schemes.

As the core index of managing energy consumption, the National Development and Reform Commission's "barometer" of energy consumption double control lights up the local area in time, which just proves that the "energy consumption double control" system is effective. For example, someone infected with the flu virus causes a fever and cough. Of course, it is very uncomfortable, but it is also a fever and cough that reminds us that it is time to take medicine.

The system of "double control of energy consumption" is the "alarm" of energy consumption. Lighting a red light and sounding an alarm in time on the eve of systemic risks in energy supply and consumption is conducive to urging local governments to seriously deal with the problem of excessive energy consumption as soon as possible, so as to avoid economic and social systemic risks caused by overall energy shortage.

The ninth meeting of the Central Financial and Economic Committee pointed out that it is a tough battle to achieve the peak of carbon dioxide emissions and carbon neutrality, and it is also a big test of our party's ability to govern the country. In this big exam, "double control of energy consumption" which is directly related to the peak value of carbon dioxide emission and the goal of carbon neutrality is a "big question" with extremely high score.

To answer this question well, we must rely on one step at a time, persist for a long time, especially pay attention to our usual work, have a plan and rhythm, and do less stupid things.

Limiting electricity and production will do us more good than harm.

First, safeguard China's international image. We have always been committed to green and healthy development, and have long set the goal of double carbon.

China people keep their word. Now that we have set this goal, we will go all out for the sake of the global living environment, no matter how difficult it is. Unlike some western countries, people say one thing and do another.

Second, for a long time, we have no say in international trade prices. We always raise the prices of things bought in China and lower the prices of things sold in China. Although we have the best epidemic control and economic recovery, orders from all walks of life abroad are also surging.

But many people who do foreign trade will find that sales go up, but profits are getting lower and lower. Why? China has always been a big factory and producer in the world. As soon as foreign demand comes up, many people will be jealous, and whether they are exposed or not, they will get together to invest in this industry.

Last year's mask industry was an example. Then more and more people went to open workshops and factories, which made the supply of raw materials in short supply and the price soared. Many industries relied on imported raw materials, so the glistening money flowed out.

And the finished product, because there are too many manufacturers, the product output has been greatly improved.

Countries like Europe and America have such a big market, and the large supply leads to too many choices for foreign buyers, so they try their best to keep the price down. However, due to fierce domestic competition, they fought a price war for small profits but quick turnover. You sell 10, I sell 8, you sell 8 and I sell 5.

Production needs to consume energy. More manufacturers consume more energy, but in the end, they find that they earn less and less money. Completely turned into a loss shouting. Then it is necessary for the country to stop this vicious circle.

Therefore, the pain is temporary, and the benefits are indeed permanent. When the output decreases, the price of foreign procurement will rise, and eventually we may get higher profits with less energy consumption than before.

Third, since the epidemic, in order to stimulate the economy, European and American countries have opened enough printing presses to directly distribute money to the people for consumption. Especially in the United States, this has led to serious domestic inflation, and the dollar is becoming less and less valuable.

If domestic vicious competition is left unchecked, so much manpower, material resources and energy are consumed and so much money is earned, it will become less and less valuable, and no one will agree.

Fourth, western countries have always accused China of wantonly destroying the global ecological environment in order to develop its economy. While enjoying our inexpensive products.

The real end of the bowl to eat, put down the bowl to curse. Well, we can make great efforts to improve the environment and reduce carbon emissions, but the price is that the corresponding end products of various industries will increase in price, and you western countries will pay a high price for my things. You can't live without being made in China, so you can only grow them.

So don't blame the government just because everything is so simple. Every policy of the country is based on the comprehensive consideration of many experts and leaders, and ultimately it is for our country and people.