What does the new four histories mean?

New Four History: Party History, New China History, Reform and Opening-up History and Socialist Development History.

Only by persisting in building the Party with thought and strengthening the Party with theory can Do not forget your initiative mind take on the mission more consciously and firmly. "We should take studying and implementing the Party's innovation theory as the top priority of ideological armed forces, and combine it with studying the history of the Party, the history of New China, the history of reform and opening up, and the history of socialist development.

The contents of the "Four History" have their own emphases, but the whole story is the practical history of China's * * * production party seeking happiness for the people, rejuvenation for the nation and harmony for the world, and the leadership of China's * * * production party is the main line of the "Four History".

Methods of learning four histories:

The core essence is historical facts, historical views and historical lessons. Historical facts, that is, to find out the objective past; Historical view, that is, understanding, explaining and evaluating the past; Taking history as a mirror means taking history as a mirror, serving the reality and enlightening the future. These three elements are interrelated. Historical facts are the cornerstone of understanding, interpreting and understanding history. When we say "there is no evidence in words, there is evidence in history", it means that history learning should proceed from facts.

Historical facts depend on historical materials, but historical materials are not equal to historical facts. Only by removing the rough and selecting the fine, removing the false and retaining the true, can historical information approach "nature" step by step.

Of course, the "nature" of history is not equal to history. Because people have different cognitive abilities and positions on the complex causal relationship formed by historical facts, they will make different or even diametrically opposite understandings and evaluations on a historical phenomenon, person or event. This cognitive difference will affect or influence the absorption of historical experience and lessons, as well as the analysis and solution of practical problems.

It can be seen that the study of the "Four History" should first be based on accurate historical facts, which are the flesh and blood of the historical view, which stems from the respect and induction of historical facts, and the historical lessons also depend on the value and logical guidance of the historical view. If there is no scientific view of history as a guide, that is, to grasp historical materials comprehensively and objectively from the standpoint of the party and the people and to understand historical facts historically and dialectically, it is impossible to have a realistic scientific understanding and understanding of the "Four History".