Nokia E66 mobile phone network access point is mobile phone short message cmwap cmnet, which saves more traffic (I am GPRS5).

They are the same because they belong to the same mobile company. Q: Who is it? Is it Cmwap or Cmnet? Is that a mobile phone MMS? I dialed the wrong number, so the answer I want is that mobile MMS and Cmwap can save more traffic as mobile phone network access points. A: CMWAP and CMNET are both GPRS access methods of China Mobile. The former is set for WAP Internet access, while the latter is mainly for GPRS Internet access services such as PC, notebook computer and PDA. There is no difference in implementation between the two, but due to different positioning, compared with CMNET, CMWAP has some restrictions and differences in tariffs. Generally, CMWAP provides unlimited monthly service, while CMNET package has traffic restrictions. When surfing the Internet, the traffic generated by CMWAP will be bigger and slower due to the proxy form, while the traffic generated by CMNET is smaller and faster due to the direct connection mode. From the perspective of cost performance, Cmwap is more cost-effective. Q: You avoided my question: MMS and cmwap are more traffic-saving as access points of mobile phone networks. Answer: Oh, my God. CMWAP Q: Ghost ... Q: The less traffic is needed to generate more traffic, isn't it?