Execution of objection application

In this fast-developing era, each of us may need to use an application form, through which we can express our wishes and requirements. Is it really as difficult as you think to write an application? The following is my carefully compiled 10 execution objection application, I hope it will help you.

※ Application for execution objection 1 Objection Applicant: China Bank Co., Ltd. _※※※※※ Sub-branch.

※ address: address

※ Person in charge: Position: President.

Requested items:

Request not to execute (20) No.4 No.2 civil ruling in the early Republic of China, and lift the freezing measures of No.3 pledge deposit account established by the limited company in the dissenting applicant.

Facts and reasons:

On ※ and ※.

Your hospital has made an objection of (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) (20) 6528. The applicant declared to your hospital in the notice of assistance in freezing deposits (receipt) that "this account is

According to the provisions of Article 85 of the Supreme People's Court's Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Guarantee Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the deposit has been designated and the applicant possesses it based on the pledge. ※ Your institute cannot deduct the funds from the deposit account of the company limited by shares.

Based on the above reasons, if your hospital enforces (20) the bank deposit of the executed person of 9 million yuan, it will damage the legitimate rights and interests of the dissenting applicant, and we urge your hospital to suspend the execution of this payment. ※.

To sum up, the dissenting applicant objected to the execution of this case according to relevant laws and regulations, and requested your institute to find out the facts, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the dissenting applicant, refuse to execute it, and lift the freezing measures for the pledged deposit account of Limited Company. ※.

I am here to convey

People's court ※

※ Objection applicant: China Bank Co., Ltd. ※※.

※ ※ ※ Month ※ ※ Day of 20 Years

Attached:

1, bank acceptance agreement in 4 copies;

2. Four copies of the margin financing and securities lending pledge contract;

3.7. Bank acceptance bills;

4. Seven deposit receipts.

Application Form 2 for Implementation Objection Applicant: _ _ _ _ Limited Development Company

Legal Representative: _ _ _ _

After the loan, our company applied to the people's court for a loan, and now it has repaid _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ten thousand yuan in cash. And _ _ _ _ _ _ _ That is to say, our company has far exceeded the amount that needs to be paid, and now _ _ _ _ company's application for auctioning our commercial housing is unreasonable and has no legal basis.

To sum up, the applicant believes that in this case. The executor of the application has fully fulfilled the obligations in the judgment, and there is no factual and legal basis for your institute to continue to auction our commercial housing. We hereby propose an execution objection to your hospital, requesting your hospital to conclude this case and execute it according to the facts.

I am here to convey

_ _ _ _ City Legal Person People's Court

Applicant: _ _ _ _ Limited Development Company

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Objection No.3 Application executor: Cao xx, male, Han nationality, born in xxx year1October 27th, 165438, ID number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, address: No.48 Shengli Road, XX City, Chongqing, and telephone number: XXXXXXXXXXX.

The case of xx Rural Credit Cooperative Union (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) v. the applicant for a loan contract dispute was tried by the people's court of xx City in Chongqing in absentia, and a trial judgment of (20xx) Yong Min Chu Zi No. Xxx, which has taken legal effect, enters the execution procedure. According to the ruling (20xx) Yong Min Zhi ZiNo. 102. On xxxx, your hospital has taken measures to freeze and transfer the applicant's bank deposits. The applicant believes that the original effective judgment found the facts wrong and infringed on the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant, and hereby raises an objection.

Requested items:

I. Ruling on Suspension of Execution (20xx) Yong Min Zhong Zi No.20 1. Xxxx award;

Two, suspend the payment to the plaintiff has been deducted from the applicant's money, so as not to cause irreparable losses to the applicant;

Three, unblock the frozen account of the applicant, so as not to expand the loss of the applicant.

Facts and reasons:

In 20xx, the applicant's bank account was seized and frozen, and some funds were deducted, which caused great damage to the applicant's property and reputation. We learned from your hospital that your hospital tried the case of xx rural credit cooperative union v. the applicant for loan contract dispute in absentia, and the judgment of first instance was (20xx) Yong Min Chu Zi No. 1683 has entered the execution program. The applicant is deeply indignant at this effective judgment, and raises objections with the following reasons:

1. The applicant has never borrowed money from the plaintiff, and the applicant knows nothing about the plaintiff and borrowing 40,000 yuan from the plaintiff. From February 9, 65438 +xxx (the plaintiff claimed that the applicant borrowed money) to June 54381October 00 and June 54381October 09 (the time when the plaintiff sent the dunning notice), the plaintiff never sent a telegram, wrote a letter or asked for a loan for many years, and the applicant never received the dunning notice or other written documents from the plaintiff.

2. The applicant has never received the litigation documents and notices about this case from your hospital, and knows nothing about the progress of the proceedings in this case. It is hasty and wrong for the court to make a judgment by default without receiving any litigation documents and notices.

The applicant has lived in 08x 1x3, Shengli Road, xx City for many years. My family and children also live here, and the plaintiff never left during the lawsuit. As long as the plaintiff and the court want to get in touch with the applicant, they can get the communication method and address through various channels; If the court can fulfill its obligation to inform, the applicant has no reason not to know about the loan or even the lawsuit. The court only relies on one sentence in the plaintiff's inquiry transcript, that is, the applicant's whereabouts are unknown, which violates the rigor and authority of the law and is obviously rash and irresponsible.

3. The applicant has never borrowed money from the plaintiff, and the applicant has never entrusted others to borrow money from the plaintiff on his behalf.

After the applicant copied the relevant materials from the court, after careful identification, the applicant did not sign the loan application, mortgage loan contract, real estate mortgage contract, loan receipt and other documents, and the signatures on these documents were all signed by others in their own names. Meanwhile, the applicant has not entrusted anyone to borrow money from the plaintiff. Accordingly, the applicant should not bear any legal responsibility for repayment, and the judgment of the court of first instance on the applicant's repayment lacks factual and legal basis.

Four, the plaintiff's loan application, mortgage loan contract, real estate mortgage contract, loan receipt and other documents used to prove the "loan relationship" with the applicant should not be used as the basis for judgment. My signature in the above-mentioned evidence submitted by the plaintiff was forged by others. Therefore, it is against common sense and law to make a judgment by default without fulfilling the notification obligation without verifying the authenticity of the evidence.

5. The evidence provided by the plaintiff shows that the loan period is from19xx65438+February 9 to19xx65438+February 7, so the applicant should demand payment from the applicant or bring a lawsuit before February 7, 20xx (even if it is not the applicant's loan). On June 8, 20xx, the plaintiff sent a reminder letter 10 19 to the applicant, and brought a lawsuit to the court. The plaintiff's lawsuit was four years earlier, and the court still made a judgment in favor of the plaintiff without receiving the notice, which is wrong.

To sum up, the application executor thinks that the original effective judgment found the facts wrong, and now the basis is in line with the provisions of Article 204, and now he applies to your hospital for suspension of execution, so as to find out the facts and protect the lawful rights and interests of the application executor from infringement.

I am here to convey

Xx Municipal People's Court

Applicant: xx

Time:

4 ** County People's Court:

Applicants * * * and * * * filed an application for execution objection to your hospital, requesting the court to cancel the civil rulings of * * Court (* * * *) *No. * * and (* * * *) * *, and to lift the compensation for house demolition seized by * * in the house expropriation and processing center in * * county. The reason for this is the following：

On * * * of * *, my father divorced my mother * * *, and the house located in * * Street * District of * * County (the title certificate number is: * F.Q.ZiNo. * * * * *, and the construction area is * * * * square meters; * The fact is that the building area of the house ownership certificateNo. * * * * * has been provided to the applicant. However, in * * *, when the house was not transferred, the parents used the house to mortgage a loan of * * million yuan to * * * and went through the mortgage registration procedures, and the mortgage period was * * years.

(**********)。 When the house was demolished in * * *, it was still in the mortgage period. As of * * * *, the parents' mortgage loan principal and interest have been repaid by * * * million yuan, and there are still more than * * million yuan outstanding. According to the law, the mortgagee has the priority to get compensation for demolition, and the court ruled that the seizure first violated the interests of the mortgagee. Therefore, the application executor decided to cancel the execution objection application, please approve it!

I am here to convey

* * * People's Court

Applicant:

* * * * Year * Month * * Day

Applicant: name, gender, age, nationality, home address, telephone number, etc.

Request: Request to lift the compulsory enforcement measures such as the seizure of the applicant's house in Building XX, XX Community, XX City.

Facts and reasons: In the case of Du XX v. Wang XX, our court has made a judgment and it has taken effect. However, the house originally owned by Wang XX, located in Building XX, XX Community, XX City, was transferred to the applicant the year before last, as evidenced by the sales contract and notarial certificate of both parties. Therefore, the house located in Building XX, XX Community, XX City has been owned by the applicant, and it is wrong for your hospital to enforce it as the property of Wang XX. It has seriously infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant, and the applicant hereby raises an objection to your hospital, demanding that the compulsory enforcement measures such as the seizure of the applicant's house in Building XX, XX Community, XX City be lifted, and hope to be allowed according to law.

XX Municipal People's Court

Applicant: XXX

XXXX year x month XX day

Outsider in the case of executing objection application 6: Li XX, male, Han nationality,1born on May 23rd, 960, living in Row X, Yard XX, Qingnian East Road, XX Town, zhongmou county, with the ID number of 41019xxx5230xxx. Tel: 13937 1XXXX

Applicant executor: XX Road Sub-branch of Bank of Zhengzhou Co., Ltd. (formerly XX Road Sub-branch of Zhengzhou City Commercial Bank), address: Building A, Building XXX3 1-3, Jinshui District, Zhengzhou City;

Person in charge: XXX Position: Manager

Executed: Ran XX, male, Han nationality,/kloc-0, born in March 1970, living at No.38 Dongshang, XX, zhongmou county, with ID number; 41012219x0x10xx9, tel: 13608XX27XX.

Application request:

1. Request to cancel the execution ruling of Jinshui District Court (20xx) Jin Zhi Zi No.268-1;

2. Request to lift the seizure of the house located on the fourth floor of Building 2 at the southeast corner of Guandu Street and Chengdong Road in zhongmou county and stop the auction.

Facts and reasons: Li XX, an outsider, and Ran XX, the executed person, entered into a house sales contract orally on April 29th, 20xx. According to the agreement, the executor Ran XX sold the house on the fourth floor of the second building at the southeast corner of Guandu Street and Chengdong Road in zhongmou county to Li XX, and Li Yuzhong, an outsider, paid the full amount of 80,000 yuan before moving in. On September 10, 20xx, the executed person Ran xx mortgaged the house to XX Road Sub-branch of Zhengzhou City Commercial Bank (now XX Road Sub-branch of Bank of Zhengzhou) without authorization, and went through the mortgage registration procedures. At present, XX Road Sub-branch of Zhengzhou City Commercial Bank has applied to the court to seal up and execute the house involved, and the executor of the application thinks that the people's court will seal it up and execute it.

This behavior violated their legitimate rights and interests. According to Article 28 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Handling of Objection and Reconsideration Cases by People's Courts and Article 17 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Seizure, Seizure and Freezing of Property by People's Courts in Civil Execution, they requested the people's courts to cancel the enforcement ruling (20xx) J.Z.Zi. No.268-1,and lift the seizure of the houses involved and stop execution according to law.

I am here to convey

Jinshui district people's court

Applicant:

date month year

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning People's Courts Handling Cases of Objection to Execution and Reconsideration with Relevant Legal Basis

Article 28 In the execution of monetary creditor's rights, the people's court shall support the buyer's objection to the real estate registered in the name of the person subjected to execution, if it meets the following circumstances and his rights can be excluded from execution: (1) disputes over sales contracts;

(a) the people's court has signed a legal and effective written sales contract before the seizure;

(2) The real estate has been legally occupied before the people's court seals it up;

(3) Having paid all the price or paid part of the price in accordance with the contract and delivering the remaining price to the people's court for execution in accordance with the regulations;

(4) The transfer registration is not handled due to the buyer's own reasons.

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Attachment, Seizure and Freezing of Property in Civil Execution of People's Courts Article 17 If the person subjected to execution sells all the property that needs to be registered for transfer to a third party, and the third party has paid part or all of the price and actually occupies the property, but has not gone through the transfer registration formalities, the people's court may attach, detain and freeze it; If the third party has paid the full price and actually occupied it, but has not gone through the transfer registration formalities, and the third party is not at fault, the people's court shall not seal up, detain or freeze it.

Application for execution objection 7

Objection: Fang XX, female, Han nationality, born on ××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××

In the process of applying for enforcement of civil judgment (20xx), Suinan Famin No.1 14 1 the executed person Liang xx and the industrial development company of XX District, your hospital mistakenly took the property of the executed person No.XX Avenue in XX District, XX City as its own. The dissenter raises an execution objection according to law.

Requested items:

Immediately stop the execution and return the property of the dissident to XXX Avenue, Nansha Street, District XX.

Facts and reasons

On April 2, 20xx, the dissident Fang XX signed a Real Estate Sales Contract with the industrial development company of the executed person XX, stipulating that the executed person would sell his house located in Room XX. According to Article 17 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Attachment, Seizure and Freezing of Property in Civil Execution of People's Courts, the executed person will sell all the property that needs to be registered and transferred to a third person, and the third person has paid part or all of the price and actually possessed the property. If the third party has paid the full price and actually occupied it, but has not gone through the transfer registration formalities, and the third party is not at fault, the people's court shall not seal up, detain or freeze it.

To sum up, the dissident is an outsider, and it is obviously wrong for your hospital to enforce the property of the dissident. In accordance with the provisions of Article 202 of the Civil Procedure Law, if you raise any objection, please immediately stop the execution of the above-mentioned property and make a comeback to effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the objected person.

I am here to convey

XX District People's Court

Against:

Date:

Objection to application for execution Article 8 The executor of the application: He Mou, female, born on XX, XX, address: XXXXX, now unemployed.

Request: Request not to execute the ruling of Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court (20xx). Facts and reasons:

The case of Chai Mou v. Wang Mou's private lending dispute came into effect on April XX, 20xx after the final judgment of Shenzhen Luohu District People's Court and Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court. The Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court ruled that the execution of the property owned by the application executor in XXXXXX deprived the application executor of his legitimate rights and interests.

1. The applicant is unaware of the loan relationship between Chai and Wang.

1. Chai Chengwang borrowed 500,000 yuan from him on XX, XX, XX. The applicant knew nothing about this, and Wang never used the applicant's 500,000 yuan to live with Wang's family.

During the marriage relationship between the applicant and Wang, both parties have fixed jobs, stable lives, healthy family members, no major expenses in family life, and no large investment behavior. There is no need to borrow so much debt from Chai. Wang borrowed money from Chai without telling the applicant, and never used any money for family life. 2。 Chai only relied on a loan with serious defects to prove that Wang borrowed 500,000 yuan from him, and the facts were ambiguous. First, Chai lent a huge sum of 500,000 yuan, but I don't know where Wang used it. How to repay? The proof provided by Chai that Wang owes him 500,000 yuan is not only unrecognizable, but also does not specify the necessary conditions such as repayment period and repayment method, which is inconsistent with daily significance. Second, there has always been an affair between Chai and Wang, and this iou is Chai Zhijie's guarantee to coerce Wang to maintain proper relationship. The so-called borrowing money is completely false. Third, even if Wang provided Chai Zhijie with a loan of 500,000 yuan, it should be regarded as a gift from Wang to Chai, which did not take effect before the actual delivery. 2. The applicant and Wang divorced by the civil affairs department on XX, XX, XX, and the property executed in this case has been divided and owned by the applicant according to law. The court ruled that the property under the name of the applicant executor should not be executed according to law, depriving the applicant executor of the litigation rights he should enjoy according to law.

1. The trial of the case of private lending dispute between Chai and Wang lasted 1 year for XX months. During this period, Chai did not file any lawsuit against the applicant, and the court did not let the applicant participate in the trial as a co-defendant or a third party.

2. The applicant and Wang divorced by the civil affairs department on XX, XX, XX, and the property executed in this case has been divided and owned by the applicant according to law. The court ruled that the enforcement of all the property of the applicant is "summary execution without trial" for the applicant, depriving the applicant of his litigation rights according to law.

To sum up, the executor of the application objected to the execution of this case and asked the court to find out the facts and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the executor of the application, and refused to execute it.

Shenzhen Luohu District People's Court

Objection to application for execution 9 Objection outside the case: (individual) name, address and ID number. Entrusted agent information.

Objection (original executor): (company) name, domicile and legal representative. Entrusted agent information.

Objection (original executor): same as above.

Requested items:

Request the court to suspend the seizure (or freeze, auction, etc.). ).

Facts and reasons:

In the process of executing the award. Your hospital is sealed up (or frozen, auctioned, etc.). ) property, because the property belongs to the objector, now your hospital raises a written objection and requests your hospital to cancel (or stop or suspend) the execution of the property.

(explain reasons and legal basis)

I am here to convey

_ _ Municipal People's Court

Applicant:

Date:

Objection to application execution 10 Application executor: * * * *, domicile * * * Hefei, Anhui Province.

Legal Representative: * * *, * * * * *

Request: facts and reasons for detaining * * * * * * * *:

Your institute closed the business of * * * * * * * due to the loan dispute between * * * *.

Pinfang (hereinafter referred to as commercial housing). The applicant now opposes the seizure for the following reasons:

First, the ownership of commercial housing belongs to the applicant. The applicant and * * * * opened a * * * center in Hefei and signed a Commodity House Sales Contract (hereinafter referred to as the Contract) with the number of * * * * to sell the commodity house to * * *. According to the contract, * * should pay the down payment of 65,438+005,453 yuan on the date of signing the contract, and apply for bank mortgage to pay the remaining house payment of 240,000 yuan before 65,438+0 in 20xx; At the request of * * *, the applicant agrees that * * will actually pay part of the down payment of 36,362 yuan on 20xx1October 3 1 day, and the balance of the down payment is 6,9091yuan * * * * promises to pay it before February 28th 12 yuan; However, * * did not pay the down payment balance of 69,096.5438+0 yuan when it was due on February 28th, 20xx, and did not apply for bank mortgage. Since then, * * * * is missing. Although the house has been put on record, it has not been registered for property rights. People's Republic of China (PRC) property right law

Article 9 clearly stipulates: "The establishment, alteration, transfer and extinction of the real right of immovable property shall take effect after being registered according to law; Without registration, it will not take effect, except as otherwise provided by law. " Based on this, it can be concluded that the ownership of the house has not been transferred, and it still belongs to the applicant and is the legal property of the applicant.

Secondly, according to the arbitration clause stipulated in the contract, the applicant applied to Hefei Arbitration Commission for arbitration on October 4th, 20xx65438. Hefei Arbitration Commission tried the case in absentia according to law, and ruled with Avadno. * * * * * * * * *.

Third, Article 19 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Attachment, Seizure and Freezing in Civil Execution of People's Courts clearly stipulates: "If the person subjected to execution purchases the property of a third party that needs to be transferred, and has paid part or all of the price and actually occupies the property, but the application executor has paid the remaining price to the third party or the third party agrees to give priority to paying the remaining price from the price of the property, the people's court may attach, detain and freeze it." In the case of loan dispute between * * * * and * * * *, * *, as the executor of the application, failed to pay the remaining price to * * * * *; * * * * * also does not agree to give priority to payment from the changed property price. Therefore, your institute cannot seal up the commercial house of * * * *.

Based on the above two reasons, the applicant thinks that the seizure of commercial housing by your institute is wrong, which damages the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant. The applicant now raises an objection and requests your institute to lift the seizure of commercial housing.

I am here to convey

Hefei * * * * * People's Court

Applicant: * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Date, month and year