Joke Collection Website - Public benefit messages - Have you ever encountered such an interview in Desert Island Escape?

Have you ever encountered such an interview in Desert Island Escape?

Have you ever encountered such an interview in Desert Island Escape?

Have you ever encountered such an interview in Desert Island Escape? Nowadays, there are all kinds of strange questions in interviews. When comparing some When special questions arise, how should you answer them correctly? Let me share with you below. Have you ever encountered such an interview in Desert Island Escape? If you encounter such a question, how should you answer it. Desert Island Escape Have you ever encountered such an interview? 1

When a private jet landed on a desert island, only six people survived. At this time, the only escape tool was a rubber ball hanging basket, with no water or food.

Role allocation:

1. Pregnant woman: 8 months pregnant

2. Inventor: Researching new energy (renewable, non-polluting) cars

p>

3. Medical scientists: Over the years, they have conducted in-depth research on the treatment of AIDS and made some breakthroughs.

4. Astronauts: About to go to Mars to find a new planet suitable for human habitation

5. Ecologists: Working Group to Save Tropical Rainforests

6 , Homeless

Reference reason:

Homeless: "It is extremely dangerous to survive in a hot air balloon. Some people will either contribute to mankind, or one person will have two lives, so let me take the risk, and I will bring people back to save you."

Astronaut: I have experienced special situations. survival training, meaning he has the best chance of survival after using a hot air balloon. So, he was most likely to bring rescuers to save others. In addition, the remaining four people happen to form the best team. Only these people can survive on the desert island until the astronauts find reinforcements.

Many people choose to be pregnant, but the idea of ??this topic is not to discuss the value of life, but to weigh the pros and cons and find the best survival plan. The person who chose the pregnant woman may be kind, but they have not considered the practicality of this plan. Is it serious to ask a pregnant woman who has difficulty standing up and walking normally to control a hot air balloon to survive? How can you pin all your hopes for survival on a pregnant woman with limited mobility?

In addition, there are also some different themes, such as desert survival and so on.

What are these interview questions mainly designed to examine? Perhaps the recruitment companies that widely use these topics today are not very clear. In addition to testing psychology, listening and explaining abilities, these questions mainly test the ability to classify and plan. Of course, some basic common sense is also essential. of. Have you ever encountered such an interview in Desert Island Escape 2

1. Question

A private plane crashed on a desert island, and only 6 people survived:

1. Pregnant women: Eight months into pregnancy

2. Inventor: Currently researching new energy (renewable, non-polluting) cars

 3. Medical scientist: Breakthrough progress has been made in researching AIDS treatment options this year

4. Astronaut: About to go on an expedition into space to find a new planet suitable for human habitation

5. Ecologist: responsible for the tropical rainforest rescue working group

6. Tramp

At this time, the only escape tool was a rubber balloon basket that could accommodate one person, and there was no water or food. So, who should leave the island in a balloon?

2. Problems and requirements

1. Candidates are asked to read the questions carefully and prepare an outline of their speech. The time limit is 2 minutes.

2. According to the order of drawing lots, each candidate in the group will speak in turn to express their opinions and state their reasons, and the time is 3 minutes.

3. Candidates enter into free discussion and must reach a consensus for 30 minutes.

4. The group selects a representative to make a concluding speech, which lasts 3 minutes.

Question analysis

This question is a sorted multiple-choice leaderless group discussion question. Multiple-choice leaderless group discussion questions often do not have a definite answer, but it does not mean that "as long as it makes sense, you can choose anything." For sorting questions, candidates must determine the sorting principles and methods in advance.

For this "six-choose-one" question, whether the examinee should choose a pregnant woman, an astronaut, or a homeless person, they cannot simply think about the characteristics of an independent individual. They must look at the living conditions of the six people on the island, and according to the final Analyze the principles and ideas that can save everyone.

Who can safely leave in a rubber ball basket, find the rescue team, and return to the desert island to try to rescue everyone safely. Once such a principle and idea is established, it is easy to eliminate interference items and find relatively correct options designed by proposition experts.

National Examination Interview Skills

First: Smile like a spring breeze.

Although we do not have the charm to win over a city with one smile, a country with a second smile, or a heart with three smiles, candidates please remember: Smiling is our best business card whether in interviews or in life.

Many candidates may think that just answering the questions well in the interview is enough, but this is not necessarily the case. From the moment you step into the examination room to the moment you walk out of the examination room, the examiner is observing you throughout the process. It is said that details determine success or failure, and we should all do better throughout the entire exam process. First of all, candidates can use a smile to relieve the serious atmosphere in the entire examination room and give the examiner a good impression. I believe everyone understands that smiling can not only show your generosity and calmness, make people feel friendly, but also relieve your nervousness to a certain extent. It is definitely the simplest and most effective magic weapon at the beginning of the interview.

Second: Don’t be impatient, be generous and natural.

Many candidates will feel very nervous about the examiner sitting in front of them, such as moving too quickly, speaking unclearly, and not being able to look directly at the examiner. Faced with these possible situations, everyone needs to pay targeted attention and corrections during daily training.

Candidates should have an accurate understanding of interviews. What is an interview? Why conduct an interview? In fact, the interview is a personnel evaluation method. Through face-to-face information communication or behavioral observation between the examiner and the candidate, it is tested whether the candidate has the abilities and personality qualities related to the position. What is communication? It means telling others your thoughts naturally. You can think about it. When you usually communicate with your friends, do you lower your head or raise your eyes? So everyone must remember to make eye contact and try to be as unscripted as possible. Especially at the beginning when the examiner talks to you about the introductory words, you should do it well. Don't rush to read the questions. This time is not included in everyone's answering time.

In addition to making eye contact, you should also pay attention to entering the venue without panic, standing firm when speaking, saying hello politely, and sitting down gracefully.

Third: Check the meaning of the question clearly and answer the question.

Many candidates may feel like this during simulation training: there will be a blank period in their heads after sitting down. If they are not adjusted in time, the tension will increase. I recommend that candidates browse the questions during this blank period. Do it, grasp the meaning of the question.

Candidates, please do not underestimate the importance of grasping the questions. Although it is very simple, it is very important. In the written test, since there is enough time, the probability of misunderstanding the meaning of the question is very small. This is not the case in the interview. If you misunderstand the question, no matter how good your answer is, it will be useless. Here are a few cases for you to take a look at, such as this question: "In order to ensure the sustainable development of fisheries, a fishermen landing project was implemented in a certain place and the fishermen were moved to villages along the Yangtze River, but the local villagers strongly opposed it.

As the person in charge of this work, how do you do this well? "Because there are too many interested parties in this question, candidates can easily confuse the subject. If they think it is fishermen who are opposed, they talk about how to be a good fishermen. Even if the answer is complete, it still doesn’t hit the point.

Let’s look at another question: “A few years ago, Lao Li built a wooden house of more than 10 square meters on a big tree in his yard. Before building the wooden house, Lao Li consulted the relevant departments whether he needed to go through the approval procedures and was told that there were no clear provisions in the current law: Someone recently posted photos of the wooden house online, which attracted the attention of many netizens. Some netizens believed that the wooden house was an illegal building and should be demolished, while others Netizens believe that since the relevant departments have not prohibited it, it should be regarded as allowed. To this end, the competent authorities have held a special meeting on the demolition of wooden houses.

If you attend this meeting, please share your suggestions.

"If you don't read the question clearly, many candidates may talk about whether it should be demolished. The requirement of the question is to ask you to make suggestions in the conference room where the wooden house is to be demolished. How should you dismantle it? For example, "First use reason to convince." People, move people with emotion to persuade Lao Li to dismantle it on his own. If this is not feasible, it can be enforced in accordance with legal provisions. ”

So, candidates don’t need to panic when you sit down to answer the questions. Although the interview time is tight, it is generally quite sufficient. You must see the questions clearly before thinking and clarifying them in the interview room. I want to speak again.