What are the benefits of financial salary?

At present, the unified financial salary mainly provides the full salary of the staff of public institutions, and it is also divided into administrative, public welfare and operating institutions. After the unified payment of wages, there are some problems in the administrative or public institutions, such as relying on the unified payment of wages and additional funds for work, lack of enthusiasm in internal management, and lack of flexible ways to restrain the assessment of cadres and workers, which restricts economic development and is particularly unfavorable to internal assessment management. Today, I would like to share with you the advantages and disadvantages of unified financial compensation. Details are as follows:

Advantages and disadvantages of unified financial payment of wages

As a financial management system, the state financial organs uniformly distribute the salaries of public officials through correspondent banks. This is a new management system that China is constantly exploring and reforming, and it is also an integral part of fiscal revenue. The unified financial payment of wages is based on some items and standards stipulated by the national wage system. The relevant financial departments issue personal funds for government agencies and institutions, and the income is transparent.

First, the financial system of wage payment.

The unified financial payment of wages can improve the management of financial expenditure, improve the efficiency of wage payment and ensure the timely and full payment of wages. Bringing the scattered wage expenses such as allowances and subsidies into the unified payment scope will play a positive role in fundamentally solving the problems of some units expanding the scope of subsidies without authorization, raising the standard of wage payment and distributing allowances and subsidies at will, and can also solve the problem of uneven income of personnel in different departments and units.

To some extent, the unified financial payment of wages has changed the loose way of wage management for cadres and workers in government agencies and institutions, mobilized the enthusiasm of workers, promoted social and political stability, and avoided the phenomenon of empty seats in units. At the same time, it also greatly saves financial funds and ensures that financial resources are concentrated to do great things.

The unified financial distribution of wages can avoid the bad phenomenon of misappropriation of wages, control the massive growth of financial support personnel, effectively mobilize local financial management, develop local economy, adjust and optimize expenditure structure, and ensure the enthusiasm of key expenditures.

Second, the drawbacks of unified financial payment of wages

Although unified wages have a very distinctive feature, we need to pay attention to the following aspects in our work practice:

1. Carry out comprehensive management outside Caneca and make reasonable allocation according to the situation of the department.

The card shows the basic salary, job level and length of service of the employee's personal salary account. Out-of-card subsidies and allowances are uniformly distributed according to state regulations. The development of provinces and cities in China is unbalanced, the allocation of funds is difficult, and subsidies are difficult in some places. In underdeveloped areas, four basic wages should be guaranteed in the unified financial distribution. In economically developed areas, the financial system will pay all wages in subsidies.

The imbalance between departments is the imbalance between the national direct leading units and local leading units. The departments directly managed by the state, such as industry and commerce, local taxes, etc., are directly funded by the directly superior units, and the wages of local leading units can only be paid after several levels of allocation, which is difficult to guarantee efficiency. Local-led units are always constrained by local financial resources. For units lacking financial resources, standards will always be lowered and implementation will be delayed. Local units lacking financial resources, if the gap cannot be prepared by themselves, will affect the payment of employee allowances.

2. Strictly compile internal and external problems and do a good job in institutional reform.

There is no basis for the preparation, and it is difficult to unify opinions. Some of the staff of public institutions or state-owned enterprises are editing and some are supernumerary. How to determine the establishment is not clearly defined and there is no basis to follow. With different headcount, employees' wages and benefits will be different, and it is difficult to guarantee the benefits of non-staff personnel, which makes them have great differences in the level of treatment. In the process of reform, the administrative organization reform is absent, some administrative units or institutions have been transformed or revoked, the original employee files have not been changed in time, and the size of the establishment has been reduced in name. In fact, the number of employees receiving wage subsidies has not decreased, and the staff has not been completely streamlined, resulting in conflicts of interest and sharp contradictions among all parties.

3. The system should be updated in time and pay attention to the financial supervision function.

The examination and approval of the salary management of cadres and workers in administrative institutions, regardless of whether the funds are sufficient, are managed by the Organization Department and the Personnel Bureau according to the salary system. Unified financial allocation shall be implemented according to the salary and execution time confirmed by the two departments, and there is no right to change, increase or decrease. The nominal wages of employees in administrative institutions at the same level in China are the same, but the actual wages are quite different. The current wage management system has affected the reasonable arrangement of financial funds by local governments. The unified payment of wages is only a cashier, while the approval and management of wages in organizational departments and personnel departments are accounting, which weakens the functions of financial distribution and supervision and management.

At present, the unified financial payment of wages is to make every effort to ensure the payment of wages, regardless of whether, when and how much the wages of additional personnel are paid. According to the regulations, the editorial board and the organization department control the quota and salary of administrative institutions, and unified financial distribution is a passive way to increase funds. Financial increase rarely considers affordability and budget arrangement, and there is no management to restrain the missed wages and excessive wages of the unit. The pressure of expenditure has given the finance, and the financial expenditure has soared, weakening the control of the financial department on financial expenditure. Financial supply and expenditure have expanded rapidly, and financial resources have been consumed too much.

4. Restrict assessment management and accelerate business collaboration.

At present, the unified financial salary mainly provides the full salary of the staff of public institutions, and it is also divided into administrative, public welfare and operating institutions. After the unified payment of wages, there are some problems in the administrative or public institutions, such as relying on the unified payment of wages and additional funds for work, lack of enthusiasm in internal management, and lack of flexible ways to restrain the assessment of cadres and workers, which restricts economic development and is particularly unfavorable to internal assessment management.

Wage payment is comprehensive and systematic, with high coordination requirements between departments and insufficient coordination between policy management and business operation. Generally, the previous link did not give enough consideration to the next link, which is far from the original intention of financial reform.

5. Pay wages in a unified way, strengthen norms and improve the efficiency of banks.

Wage expenditure is faster than fiscal revenue growth, and local county and township finances are lack of standardization, with low expenditure capacity and large gap, so it is difficult to pay wages with financial resources. The unified wage system exists in name only in counties and townships, and there is always no money to exchange salary cards. Due to industry restrictions or software and hardware restrictions, the issuing bank is inefficient, and some businesses are difficult to handle in time, which increases the difficulty of wage management. Sometimes, there is repeated work in the process of wage payment, which increases the workload, delays the payment of wages and produces errors. Sometimes it is difficult for the unit to check the salary and reconciliation.

Third, summary.

In a word, the unified payment of wages and finances, as an important system reform of public finance management, ensures the establishment and perfection of institutional establishment and establishes a restraint mechanism for the coordination of wages and budgets. There are advantages and disadvantages after the implementation of unified financial distribution, and there are also many problems. In this regard, government departments pay more attention, strengthen inspection and supervision, standardize the management of withholding money in unified wage distribution, improve the professional level of staff, improve the utilization rate of wage funds, improve the unified financial distribution, and make contributions to social stability and economic development.