What does reminder talk mean?

How to understand conversation reminders, reminder conversations and admonishment conversations

The difference between a letter inquiry, a reminder conversation, and an admonition conversation is that the former is in written form; the difference between a reminder conversation and an admonition conversation is that the two The applicable issues are of different nature, with the latter obviously being much more serious than the former. To grasp the scale, you can refer to the following methods: ① Report to the general public the general problems of leading cadres, or the organization believes that leading cadres may have signs or tendencies of violating disciplines and need to be reminded to talk. ② Regarding issues related to the ideology, moral character, integrity and diligence of leading cadres that have been reported by the public, the leading cadres who have been reported can also be consulted in writing. The leading cadres should make a pragmatic and realistic response within the specified date of receipt of the letter of inquiry. Written response. If there are special circumstances where a reply cannot be made as scheduled, the reasons should be explained. ③ If a leading cadre has any of the following circumstances, he or she should be given an admonishment talk. (1) Failure to strictly abide by the Party's discipline and organizational discipline, failure to conscientiously implement the Party's resolutions and decisions, and ineffective work arrangements. (2) Not conscientiously implementing the centralized system, having an arbitrary style, and not acting in accordance with principles and procedures, causing certain consequences; (3) Not conscientiously performing duties, causing certain losses to the work. (4) Work is flashy, divorced from reality, extravagant and wasteful, causing adverse effects.

What is the reminder conversation system and what are reminded in the conversation

The reminder conversation system

Considers the topic related

Conversation topic

What does the Discipline Inspection Commission’s talk mean?

1. Cooperate with the investigation. Your friend knows certain people or things; you need to assist the Discipline Inspection Commission in the investigation;

2. *** If your friend is a party and government leader or a powerful state cadre, that is, he is involved in some economic, party discipline or life corruption issues and has been informed by the Discipline Inspection Commission. It is necessary to explain his problems clearly at the specified time and place.

3. Generally speaking, if your friend doesn’t come back within 48 hours, it’s a failure.

Remind whether the conversation will affect promotion

It is necessary to talk, and most of the talks are conducted by people in the organizational department. This is organizational procedure. They will also find someone in your original unit to understand all aspects of your situation, such as work ability, political thoughts, relationships with colleagues, work, family, etc., and record other people's evaluations of you, etc. If there are not too many negative things and reflections, you will be promoted. If there are leaders who will talk to you after taking office.

How to understand conversation reminders, reminder conversations and admonishment conversations

Before talking to others,

you have to communicate with them,

Remind him what he should say,

Don't let him make a mistake.

How to understand conversation reminders, reminder conversations and admonishment conversations

The difference between a letter inquiry, a reminder conversation, and an admonition conversation is that the former is in written form; the difference between a reminder conversation and an admonition conversation is that the two The nature of the applicable issues is different, and the latter is obviously much more serious than the former. To grasp the scale, you can refer to the following methods: ① Report general problems of leading cadres to the public, or the organization believes that leading cadres may have signs of disciplinary violations

Do you need to meet with all employees to remind you?

Generally recorded in tabular form; including time, location, and conversational persons, usually no less than 2 people. The content is mainly about recent ideological trends, including life, work, etc., and then you conduct a simple risk assessment based on the content of his conversation. .

What are the methods of conversation?

There are six methods of conversation for the Discipline Inspection Commission: education reminder conversation, admonishment conversation, pre-appointment integrity conversation, *** conversation, conversation letter inquiry and organizational investigation conversation etc.

Under what circumstances will leading cadres be "reminded to talk"

Violation of discipline and corruption, job promotion

How to implement heart-to-heart talks and reminders, letter inquiries, Systems such as admonitions and admonitions

Implementation methods for reminders, letters of inquiry and admonitions to leading cadres

(Trial)

Article 1 is to implement the implementation of the central and provincial and municipal party committees Regarding the requirements for strict governance of the party and officials, we further strengthen the daily supervision of leading cadres at all levels. This document is formulated in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the Organization Department of the Provincial Party Committee on conducting exhortations and letters of inquiry to party members and leading cadres. Implementation methods.

Article 2 If the personnel departments of organizations at all levels discover or receive reports from the masses that leading cadres have problems in political ideology, work style, moral character, integrity and diligence, selection and employment, etc., they must follow cadre management authority to remind, inquire and admonish them.

Article 3: When reminding, consulting and admonishing leading cadres, we must adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts, objectivity and impartiality; insist on catching early signs and catching small signs to prevent the slightest; persist in combining strict supervision with care and love, and learn from past mistakes and avoid future ones. Treat illnesses and save lives.

Article 4 The leading cadres referred to in these Measures refer to cadres at the deputy section level or above in party and government agencies and public institutions, and middle-level cadres or above in state-owned enterprises and institutions.

Article 5 If a leading cadre has any of the following circumstances, he or she must be reminded:

(1) When observing the party’s political disciplines and rules and fulfilling the party’s work style and building a clean government The public has opinions on the subject responsibilities and supervisory responsibilities, the implementation of the eight central regulations, the six opinions of the provincial party committee, the six requirements of the municipal party committee, improvement of style, and integrity and self-discipline, etc., but it does not constitute a violation of discipline and it is necessary to remind them to pay attention;

(2) There are *** reports, but the circumstances are minor and do not constitute a disciplinary violation, and it is necessary to remind the individual to pay attention;

(3) Concentrate educational activities within the party, change of leadership team, During democratic life meetings, annual assessments, inspections and other work, the masses have opinions, but it does not constitute a violation of discipline and it is necessary to remind them to pay attention;

(4) Other relevant parties need to remind leading cadres to pay attention.

Article 6 If the organizational personnel department deems it necessary to remind leading cadres, the cadre work agency and cadre supervision agency shall put forward opinions based on the division of responsibilities and report them to the department leaders for approval before implementation. Reminding leading cadres can be done in interviews or in writing.

Article 7 If an interview is used as a reminder, the leader of the organization’s human resources department is generally responsible for the interview, and other relevant leaders may also be designated to be responsible for the interview.

During the interview, the reason for the interview should be explained to the person being reminded, listen to the explanation and explanation of the person being reminded, point out the issues that need attention, and put forward targeted requirements.

Article 8 If a reminder is made in writing, the cadre supervision agency shall send a reminder letter to the person being reminded, and attach a reminder letter receipt.

The reminder letter should state the reason for the reminder, point out the issues that need attention, and put forward targeted requirements.

After receiving the reminder letter, the person being reminded must fill in the reminder letter receipt form as required. If there is any need to explain or explain the reasons for the reminder, the issues pointed out, etc., they can write it on a separate sheet and write it on 3- Submit it to the agency that issued the reminder letter within 5 working days.

Article 9 If a leading cadre has any of the following circumstances, he or she may be inquired by letter:

(1) There is a *** report, but the clues to the reported problems are general and need to be reported I explain the situation in writing;

(2) Although the issues reflected in the report are relatively specific, they are general issues and I need to further explain the situation in writing;

(3) Others If there are any problems in this area, you need to inquire by letter.

Article 10 If the organizational personnel department deems it necessary to inquire by letter to leading cadres, the cadre work agency and cadre supervision agency shall put forward opinions based on the division of responsibilities, and submit them to the department leader for approval before implementation.

Article 11 When conducting correspondence inquiries on leading cadres, a letter of inquiry notice shall be sent to the object of the correspondence inquiry. The letter of inquiry must state the questions of the inquiry, the time and disciplinary requirements for reply, and indicate the contact person.

After receiving the letter of inquiry notice, the subject of the inquiry must provide a written reply realistically within 10 working days. If there are special circumstances in which a reply cannot be made as scheduled, the reasons must be explained within the prescribed time limit. If the inquiry question is not clearly explained, you can inquire it again or use other methods to understand it.

Article 12 If any of the following circumstances occurs, the organization and human resources department may entrust the main person in charge of the party organization of the unit where the subject of the letter is located to supervise him or her:

(1) Without reason Failure to respond in writing on time;

(2) Failure to provide a clear explanation after two correspondence inquiries;

(3) Other problems found.

Article 13 The organization’s human resources department shall carefully review the reply materials from the recipients of the correspondence inquiry. When necessary, appropriate methods can be used to investigate and verify the response materials.

If there are indeed problems with the subject of the inquiry, they shall be handled in accordance with relevant regulations.

Article 14 If a leading cadre has one of the following circumstances, although it does not constitute a violation of discipline, it causes adverse effects, or although it constitutes a violation of discipline, it may be exempted according to relevant regulations...